Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cost effectiveness of internet-based cognitive behaviour therapy and behavioural stress management for severe health anxiety
Show others and affiliations
2016 (English)In: BMJ Open, ISSN 2044-6055, E-ISSN 2044-6055, Vol. 6, no 4, e009327Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

OBJECTIVES: Internet-delivered exposure-based cognitive behaviour therapy (ICBT) has been shown to be effective in the treatment of severe health anxiety. The health economic effects of the treatment have, however, been insufficiently studied and no prior study has investigated the effect of ICBT compared with an active psychological treatment. The aim of the present study was to investigate the cost effectiveness of ICBT compared with internet-delivered behavioural stress management (IBSM) for adults with severe health anxiety defined as Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) hypochondriasis. ICBT was hypothesised to be the more cost-effective treatment.

SETTING: This was a cost-effectiveness study within the context of a randomised controlled trial conducted in a primary care/university setting. Participants from all of Sweden could apply to participate.

PARTICIPANTS: Self-referred adults (N=158) with a principal diagnosis of DSM-IV hypochondriasis, of whom 151 (96%) provided baseline and post-treatment data.

INTERVENTIONS: ICBT or IBSM for 12 weeks.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY MEASURES: The primary outcome was the Health Anxiety Inventory. The secondary outcome was the EQ-5D. Other secondary measures were used in the main outcome study but were not relevant for the present health economic analysis.

RESULTS: Both treatments led to significant reductions in gross total costs, costs of healthcare visits, direct non-medical costs and costs of domestic work cutback (p=0.000-0.035). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) indicated that the cost of one additional case of clinically significant improvement in ICBT compared with IBSM was $2214. The cost-utility ICER, that is, the cost of one additional quality-adjusted life year, was estimated to be $10 000.

CONCLUSIONS: ICBT is a cost-effective treatment compared with IBSM and treatment costs are offset by societal net cost reductions in a short time. A cost-benefit analysis speaks for ICBT to play an important role in increasing access to effective treatment for severe health anxiety.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01673035; Results.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2016. Vol. 6, no 4, e009327
National Category
Health Care Service and Management, Health Policy and Services and Health Economy Public Health, Global Health, Social Medicine and Epidemiology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-129865DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009327ISI: 000376391400013PubMedID: 27113231Local ID: P-3340OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-129865DiVA: diva2:925489
Available from: 2016-05-02 Created: 2016-05-02 Last updated: 2016-06-20Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Lekander, Mats
By organisation
Stress Research Institute
In the same journal
BMJ Open
Health Care Service and Management, Health Policy and Services and Health EconomyPublic Health, Global Health, Social Medicine and Epidemiology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 9 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link