Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Funding ecological restoration policy in practice-patterns of short-termism and regional biases
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Stockholm Resilience Centre.
Number of Authors: 3
2016 (English)In: Land use policy, ISSN 0264-8377, E-ISSN 1873-5754, Vol. 52, 439-453 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

With continuous degradation of ecosystems combined with the recognition of human dependence on functioning ecosystems, global interest in ecological restoration (ER) has intensified. From being merely a nature conservation measure, it is today advanced as a way to improve ecosystem functions, mitigate biodiversity loss and climate change, as well as renew human-nature relationships. However, ER is a contested and diversified term used in research, policy and practice. Substantive public funding is allocated towards this end worldwide, but little is known about its concrete purpose and coverage, as well as what decides its allocation. With inspiration from environmental funding literature we analyze the case of Sweden to provide the first national overview of public ER funding. The understudied political context of ER is thus addressed but also regional variation in funding allocation. A database of all national government funding programs between 1995 and 2011 that included projects and sub-programs aiming at practical ER measures was created. Results show that ER activities counted for 11% (130 million USD) of the total government nature conservation funding. Water environments were highly prioritized, which can be explained by economic and recreational motives behind ER. The ER funding was unevenly distributed geographically, not related to either environmental need or population size, but rather to regional administrative capacity. It was also found to be small scale and short term, and hence part of a general trend of project proliferation of public administration which runs contrary to ecosystem based management. As ER is not yet a long-term investment in Sweden, commonly seen as an environmental lead state, we expect even less and more short-term ER funding in other countries.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2016. Vol. 52, 439-453 p.
Keyword [en]
Ecological restoration, Governance, Public administration, Project proliferation, Nature conservation, Policy analysis
National Category
Biological Sciences Social and Economic Geography
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-129618DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.01.004ISI: 000372387900040OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-129618DiVA: diva2:925559
Available from: 2016-05-02 Created: 2016-04-26 Last updated: 2016-05-02Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Borgström, Sara
By organisation
Stockholm Resilience Centre
In the same journal
Land use policy
Biological SciencesSocial and Economic Geography

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 14 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link