Representation, Equality, and Inclusion in Deliberative Systems: Desiderata for a Good Account
2016 (English)In: Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, ISSN 1369-8230, E-ISSN 1743-8772, Vol. 19, no 3, 263-282 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
What has become known as ‘the systemic turn’ in the recent literature on deliberative democracy looks like a promising development. However, while much theorizing has been devoted to the question of what a deliberative system may look like, very little has been offered in terms of criteria for what is required for a system to be deliberative democratic. This paper aims to contribute to the systemic approach by setting out a number of desiderata that a satisfactory account of deliberative systems should consider when developing such criteria. This is done by analyzing the main properties of a deliberative system in relation to three essential aspects of democracy: representation, equality, and inclusion. Among other things, it is argued that when theorizing criteria for what a deliberative system requires, a systemic account should carefully distinguish between political and epistemic representation, between political and epistemic equality, and between political and epistemic inclusion.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2016. Vol. 19, no 3, 263-282 p.
deliberative system, deliberative democracy, political equality, John Dryzek, James Bohman, Jane Mansbridge
IdentifiersURN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-130320DOI: 10.1080/13698230.2016.1144854ISI: 000377030700003OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-130320DiVA: diva2:928753