Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Reliability and Construct Validity of the Psychopathic Personality Inventory-Revised in a Swedish Non-Criminal Sample - A Multimethod Approach including Psychophysiological Correlates of Empathy for Pain.
Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Stress Research Institute. (Psychoneuroimmunology)
Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Stress Research Institute. (Psychoneuroimmunology)
Show others and affiliations
2016 (English)In: PLoS ONE, ISSN 1932-6203, E-ISSN 1932-6203, Vol. 11, no 6, e0156570Article in journal (Refereed) Epub ahead of print
Abstract [en]

Cross-cultural investigation of psychopathy measures is important for clarifying the nomological network surrounding the psychopathy construct. The Psychopathic Personality Inventory-Revised (PPI-R) is one of the most extensively researched self-report measures of psychopathic traits in adults. To date however, it has been examined primarily in North American criminal or student samples. To address this gap in the literature, we examined PPI-R's reliability, construct validity and factor structure in non-criminal individuals (N = 227) in Sweden, using a multimethod approach including psychophysiological correlates of empathy for pain. PPI-R construct validity was investigated in subgroups of participants by exploring its degree of overlap with (i) the Psychopathy Checklist: Screening Version (PCL:SV), (ii) self-rated empathy and behavioral and physiological responses in an experiment on empathy for pain, and (iii) additional self-report measures of alexithymia and trait anxiety. The PPI-R total score was significantly associated with PCL:SV total and factor scores. The PPI-R Coldheartedness scale demonstrated significant negative associations with all empathy subscales and with rated unpleasantness and skin conductance responses in the empathy experiment. The PPI-R higher order Self-Centered Impulsivity and Fearless Dominance dimensions were associated with trait anxiety in opposite directions (positively and negatively, respectively). Overall, the results demonstrated solid reliability (test-retest and internal consistency) and promising but somewhat mixed construct validity for the Swedish translation of the PPI-R.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2016. Vol. 11, no 6, e0156570
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-132147DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156570PubMedID: 27300292Local ID: P-3352OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-132147DiVA: diva2:949503
Available from: 2016-07-20 Created: 2016-07-20 Last updated: 2016-09-26

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed
By organisation
Stress Research Institute
In the same journal
PLoS ONE
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 1 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link