Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Sounding Scenes of Recollection: Duration, Voice, and the Forging of Silence
Stockholm University, Faculty of Humanities, Department of Media Studies.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4706-3300
2016 (English)Conference paper, Oral presentation only (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

Voices from Chernobyl (Alexievich, 1997) is at once a novel and a record of the 1986 Chernobyl tragedy, told through a patchwork of written accounts; re-arranged fragments of oral history. A poignant detail in Alexievich’s poetic re-enactment of collected life stories is her choice to keep the three dots for many of the interviewees pauses and moments of hesitation – this detail of her original transcripts, the penned trace of ethnographic fieldwork, of listening and taking down the spoken accounts of her encounters with life history and lived time. The author’s deliberate choice, editing and re-phrasings of the authentic testimonies collected includes this technical detail of the transcript, this documentary marker of a performative act of speaking and relational aspect of personal address and attentive listening. What in Alexievich’s prose signals authenticity, enhances the moment which in cinema tends to coincide with a compelling moment of speaking bodies, silence, and framed vulnerability. Three dots to invoke the sounding scene of restrained memory work. The “complex set of relations between the visible and the invisible, the said, and the unsaid” are immanent to the testimonial act, but has always been key to the ethical and affective concerns of framed testimonies in documentary (Rancière, 2011; Renov, 2004). Shifting attention from the enactment of the (visual) trace, to the sounding of silence and time passing in filmed testimony, this paper proposes a reflection in the venue of documentary theory and film phenomenology. Departing from Alexievich’s orchestration of oral history (often referred to as “polyphonic writing”), and with references to experimental documentary and conceptual approaches to voice and listening, I aim at a conceptualization of duration, voice and the “aurality” of silence in documentary memory work. Scholarly work on film sound (Weiss and Belton, 1985; Chion, 1999), sonic objects and audiovisuality in film and video (Birtwistle, 2010 and Honess Roe, 2013), and “voice” in first person documentary (Lebow ed., 2012) will meet in this reflection on documentary scenes of recollection, where telling moments of silence are key, and where memory work often seems to operate beyond narrative enclosure and static subject-object relations.

 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2016.
Keyword [en]
Documentary, Testimony, Audiovisuality, Voice, Memory Work
National Category
Other Humanities not elsewhere specified
Research subject
Cinema Studies
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-133008OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-133008DiVA: diva2:956093
Conference
Visible Evidence XXIII, the international conference on documentary film and media, Montana, USA, August 11-14, 2016
Available from: 2016-08-29 Created: 2016-08-29 Last updated: 2016-12-09Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Wahlberg, Malin
By organisation
Department of Media Studies
Other Humanities not elsewhere specified

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Total: 42 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf