Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Assessment of ecosystem services and benefits in village landscapes – A case study from Burkina Faso
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Stockholm Resilience Centre.
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Stockholm Resilience Centre.
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Stockholm Resilience Centre.
2016 (English)In: Ecosystem Services, ISSN 2212-0416, E-ISSN 2212-0416, Vol. 21, Part A, 141-152 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Abstract Most methods to assess ecosystem services have been developed on large scales and depend on secondary data. Such data is scarce in rural areas with widespread poverty. Nevertheless, the population in these areas strongly depends on local ecosystem services for their livelihoods. These regions are in focus for substantial landscape investments that aim to alleviate poverty, but current methods fail to capture the vast range of ecosystem services supporting livelihoods, and can therefore not properly assess potential trade-offs and synergies among services that might arise from the interventions. We present a new method for classifying village landscapes into social-ecological patches (landscape units corresponding to local landscape perceptions), and for assessing provisioning ecosystem services and benefits to livelihoods from these patches. We apply the method, which include a range of participatory activities and satellite image analysis, in six villages across two regions in Burkina Faso. The results show significant and diverse contributions to livelihoods from six out of seven social-ecological patches. The results also show how provisioning ecosystem services, primarily used for subsistence, become more important sources of income during years when crops fail. The method is useful in many data poor regions, and the patch-approach allows for extrapolation across larger spatial scales with similar social-ecological systems.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2016. Vol. 21, Part A, 141-152 p.
Keyword [en]
Agricultural landscapes, Livelihoods, Participatory approach, Poverty alleviation, Sahel, Smallholder farming
National Category
Environmental Sciences
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-134039DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.08.004OAI: diva2:974816
Available from: 2016-09-27 Created: 2016-09-27 Last updated: 2016-09-27

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text
By organisation
Stockholm Resilience Centre
In the same journal
Ecosystem Services
Environmental Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 4 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link