Change search
Refine search result
1 - 21 of 21
CiteExportLink to result list
Permanent link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Rows per page
  • 5
  • 10
  • 20
  • 50
  • 100
  • 250
Sort
  • Standard (Relevance)
  • Author A-Ö
  • Author Ö-A
  • Title A-Ö
  • Title Ö-A
  • Publication type A-Ö
  • Publication type Ö-A
  • Issued (Oldest first)
  • Issued (Newest first)
  • Created (Oldest first)
  • Created (Newest first)
  • Last updated (Oldest first)
  • Last updated (Newest first)
  • Disputation date (earliest first)
  • Disputation date (latest first)
  • Standard (Relevance)
  • Author A-Ö
  • Author Ö-A
  • Title A-Ö
  • Title Ö-A
  • Publication type A-Ö
  • Publication type Ö-A
  • Issued (Oldest first)
  • Issued (Newest first)
  • Created (Oldest first)
  • Created (Newest first)
  • Last updated (Oldest first)
  • Last updated (Newest first)
  • Disputation date (earliest first)
  • Disputation date (latest first)
Select
The maximal number of hits you can export is 250. When you want to export more records please use the Create feeds function.
  • 1. Brechensbauer, Axel
    et al.
    Grafström, Maria
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Stockholm Centre for Organizational Research (SCORE). Handelshögskolan i Stockholm, Sverige .
    Jonsson, Anna
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Stockholm Centre for Organizational Research (SCORE). Lunds universitet, Sverige .
    Klintman, Mikael
    Att nå bortom grupp­tän­kandet – ett konststycke!2020In: Organisation & Samhälle, ISSN 2001-9114, E-ISSN 2002-0287, no 1Article in journal (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.))
  • 2. Brechensbauer, Axel
    et al.
    Grafström, Maria
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Stockholm Centre for Organizational Research (SCORE).
    Jonsson, Anna
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Stockholm Centre for Organizational Research (SCORE).
    Klintman, Mikael
    En kamp bortom torg och torn2019In: Kampen om kunskap: Akademi och praktik / [ed] Axel Brechensbauer, Maria Grafström, Anna Jonsson, Mikael Klintman, Stockholm: Santérus Förlag, 2019, p. 159-166Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 3. Brechensbauer, Axel
    et al.
    Grafström, MariaStockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Stockholm Centre for Organizational Research (SCORE).Jonsson, AnnaStockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Stockholm Centre for Organizational Research (SCORE).Klintman, Mikael
    Kampen om kunskap: Akademi och praktik2019Collection (editor) (Other academic)
    Abstract [sv]

    Det ropas allt högre om att forskare ska samverka med det omgivande samhället. Det är rop som vittnar om en stor tilltro till att morgondagens vetenskapliga genombrott garanteras genom att kunskap produceras i samverkan. Men vad betyder det att samverka? Är den alltid att föredra? Främjar eller kanske rentav hotar samverkan kunskapsproduktion i samhället?

    Denna essäsamling syftar till att belysa och diskutera hur kunskap förstås och genereras i gränslandet mellan akademi och praktik. I detta gränsland utspelar sig en kamp om kunskap en kamp som ofta färgas av förenklade, extrema bilder av forskaren som antingen isolerad i ett elfenbenstorn eller frivolt minglande på marknadstorget. Det är en kamp som väcker frågor om forskarens roll, och synen på kunskap, i samhället. Författarna till bokens tretton essäer kommer från en bredd av discipliner inom humaniora och samhällsvetenskap. Genom att låta varje essä speglas i en seriebild vill vi bidra till ytterligare tanke och reflektion kring vad kampen om kunskap handlar om. Vår ambition och förhoppning är att ge bränsle till en diskussion bortom tornet och torget om möjligheter och utmaningar med dagens syn på kunskapsproduktion och vilken roll samverkan kan, eller bör, spela.

  • 4. Brechensbauer, Axel
    et al.
    Grafström, Maria
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Stockholm Centre for Organizational Research (SCORE).
    Jonsson, Anna
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Stockholm Centre for Organizational Research (SCORE).
    Klintman, Mikael
    Kunskap mellan elfenbenstorn och marknadstorg2019In: Kampen om kunskap: Akademi och praktik / [ed] Axel Brechensbauer, Maria Grafström, Anna Jonsson, Mikael Klintman, Stockholm: Santérus Förlag, 2019, p. 11-18Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 5. Brechensbauer, Axel
    et al.
    Grafström, Maria
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Stockholm Centre for Organizational Research (SCORE).
    Jonsson, Anna
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Stockholm Centre for Organizational Research (SCORE).
    Klintman, Mikael
    Risk för ökad misstro när forskare tvingas förenkla2019In: Dagens nyheter, ISSN 1101-2447Article in journal (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.))
  • 6.
    Grafström, Maria
    et al.
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Stockholm Centre for Organizational Research (SCORE).
    Jonsson, Anna
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Stockholm Centre for Organizational Research (SCORE). Lund University, Sweden.
    Professional blinders? The novel as an eye-opener in organizational analysis2019In: Culture and Organization, ISSN 1475-9551, E-ISSN 1477-2760, Vol. 25, no 2, p. 146-158Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    Scholarly textbooks often follow a logic where suitable empirical cases are selected to illustrate the theoretical and analytical points that we as scholars want to make. But what would happen if we would do the opposite: build a textbook on a novel written by a novelist for such purpose and let the theories explain the actions and emotions of fictional characters? In this article, we share and reflect upon our experiences of co-authoring a textbook in organization theory together with a professional novelist. We argue that the novel can function as an eye-opener in organizational analysis, forcing us to look beyond more static and rationalistic perspectives on organizations as well as the stereotypes of such. We build and relate our experiences to the growing literature about using fiction in scholarly work and discuss the potential of such genre-bending work when we bring in flesh and blood into the analyses.

  • 7.
    Grafström, Maria
    et al.
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Stockholm Centre for Organizational Research (SCORE).
    Jonsson, Anna
    When fiction meets theory: Writing with voice, resonance, and an open end2020In: Writing Differently / [ed] Alison Pullen, Jenny Helin, Nancy Harding, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2020, p. 113-129Chapter in book (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    In this chapter, we explore genre-blurring writing, where fiction meets theory, following the argument that texts in management and organisation studies suffer from the ‘textbook syndrome’. The stories that we tell through textbooks not only influence, but also set boundaries for, the way understandings are developed through the eyes of the reader. Often textbooks are written in a way that lead the reader into an idealised linear understanding of an organisation – far from the problems, dilemmas and messy everyday life that managers experience. Our discussion builds on previous literature on writing differently and our own experiences of writing a textbook by involving a professional novelist. Engaging in genre-blurring writing opens up how we think not only about writing, fiction and facts but also in our role as scientists. By situating ourselves, as researchers, at the intersection of fiction and the scientific work, not only new ways of writing, but also of thinking emerge. We discuss three aspects through which fiction challenge and develop our writing and thinking, namely to write with voice, resonance and an open end. Through genre-blurring writing, we create opportunities both to learn and to engage students in learning.

  • 8.
    Grafström, Maria
    et al.
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Stockholm Centre for Organizational Research (SCORE).
    Jonsson, Anna
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Stockholm Centre for Organizational Research (SCORE).
    Klintman, Mikael
    Collaborating across societal sectors: A buzzword or a governance mechanism for research?2017Conference paper (Refereed)
  • 9.
    Grafström, Maria
    et al.
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Stockholm Centre for Organizational Research (SCORE).
    Jonsson, Anna
    Klintman, Mikael
    Från folkbildning till kunskapsproduktion2020In: Ledning och (sned-)styrning i högskolan / [ed] Mats Alvesson, Stefan Sveningsson, Lund: Studentlitteratur AB, 2020, p. 219-242Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 10.
    Grafström, Maria
    et al.
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Stockholm Centre for Organizational Research (SCORE).
    Jonsson, Anna
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Stockholm Centre for Organizational Research (SCORE).
    Stig, Oline
    Lars, Strannegård
    Det är genom fiktion som faktan får liv och mening2018In: Svenska dagbladet, ISSN 1101-2412Article in journal (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.))
  • 11.
    Grafström, Maria
    et al.
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Stockholm Centre for Organizational Research (SCORE).
    Jonsson, Anna
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Stockholm Centre for Organizational Research (SCORE).
    Stig, Oline
    Strannegård, Lars
    En berättelse om organisering2017Book (Other academic)
    Abstract [sv]

    En berättelse om organisering blandar fiktion med organisationsteorins grunder. Boken drivs framåt av vad som händer på det nystartade modeföretaget Mess. Genom skildringen av Mess och människorna i och runt omkring företaget ser vi framgångar, konflikter och utmaningar i organisationsteorins ljus. Mötet mellan den fiktiva berättelsen och de teoretiska fördjupningarna ger grundläggande förståelse för organisationsteorins olika delområden, såsom ledarskap, makt, motivation, kultur och beslutsfattande. Boken erbjuder kunskap och reflektion om varför organisation och organisering är centrala begrepp för att förstå det samhälle vi lever i.

  • 12.
    Jonsson, Anna
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Stockholm Centre for Organizational Research (SCORE).
    Samverkan i ropet. Hur förväntas vi nå ut med vår forskning?2018In: Är det någon konst att vara akademiker?: Ett symposium om Academic skills / [ed] Carina Sjöholm, Magnus Jerneck, Lund: Lunds universitet , 2018, p. 55-61Chapter in book (Other academic)
    Download full text (pdf)
    fulltext
  • 13.
    Jonsson, Anna
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Stockholm Centre for Organizational Research (SCORE).
    Samverkansjakten: Kanske är vi bara kloka tillsammans2019In: Kampen om kunskap: Akademi och praktik / [ed] Axel Brechensbauer, Maria Grafström, Anna Jonsson, Mikael Klintman, Stockholm: Santérus Förlag, 2019Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 14.
    Jonsson, Anna
    et al.
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Social Anthropology, Stockholm Centre for Organizational Research (SCORE).
    Brechensbauer, Axel
    Maria, Grafström
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Social Anthropology, Stockholm Centre for Organizational Research (SCORE).
    Communicating science through competing logics and a scienc-art lens2022In: Journal of Science Communication, E-ISSN 1824-2049, Vol. 21, no 7, article id YO1Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    This essay takes a starting point in the well-known tension between the media logic and the scientific logic and the challenges when communicating science in a mediatized society. Building on the experience of engaging in research comics, both as a method for communicating science and a creative example of a meeting between science and art, we introduce a framework — a pedagogical tool — for how science communication can be understood through the two competing logics. We contribute to literature about the balancing act of being a ‘legitimate expert’ and a ‘visible scientist’, and suggest that the meeting between science and art can be understood as a lens for how to communicate science that goes beyond the deficit model.

  • 15.
    Jonsson, Anna
    et al.
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Stockholm Centre for Organizational Research (SCORE).
    Grafström, Maria
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Stockholm Centre for Organizational Research (SCORE).
    Rethinking science communication: Reflections on what happens when science meets comic art2021In: Journal of Science Communication, E-ISSN 1824-2049, Vol. 20, no 2, article id Y01Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    In this essay, we explore what happens when science meets comic art and how such meeting offers an opportunity to rethink science communication. We base our discussion on our own experience, as research scholars, of engaging in a collaboration with a comic artist. Three key reflections are developed: how comic art may help to (1) conceptualize ideas in an early research phase, (2) clarify the main argument by making the (un)written word visible; and (3) communicate science with an open end. These aspects contribute to an increased understanding of science communication in both research and society.

    Download full text (pdf)
    fulltext
  • 16.
    Jonsson, Anna
    et al.
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Stockholm Centre for Organizational Research (SCORE). Lunds universitet, Sverige .
    Grafström, Maria
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Stockholm Centre for Organizational Research (SCORE). Handelshögskolan i Stockholm, Sverige .
    Klintman, Mikael
    Kunskapssamverkan: Mellan elfenbenstorn och marknadstorg2021Book (Other academic)
    Abstract [sv]

    Det finns en förväntan om att forskare ska samverka i samförstånd med det omgivande samhället för att lösa komplexa problem. Kunskapssamverkan är dock en process som bara delvis präglas av konsensus. När aktörer från olika sfärer möts för att utveckla ny kunskap är det också viktigt att värna sin särart. I detta häfte undersöks och diskuteras hur kunskapssamverkan rotad i vetenskaplig verksamhet kan – och bör – organiseras genom både samråd och förhandling.

    Download full text (pdf)
    fulltext
  • 17.
    Jonsson, Anna
    et al.
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Social Anthropology, Stockholm Centre for Organizational Research (SCORE). Lund University, Sweden.
    Maria, Grafström
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Social Anthropology, Stockholm Centre for Organizational Research (SCORE).
    Klintman, Mikael
    Lund University, Sweden.
    Unboxing knowledge in collaboration between academia and society: A story about conceptions and epistemic uncertainty2022In: Science and Public Policy, ISSN 0302-3427, E-ISSN 1471-5430, Vol. 49, no 4, p. 583-597Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    Policymakers increasingly emphasize knowledge collaboration between academia and society as important means to generate innovations and solve complex issues. However, while recent literature on such collaboration suggests that knowledge needs to be integrated and generated across disciplines and sectors, there are surprisingly few studies that define what is meant by ‘knowledge’ or focus on the process of generating knowledge. Subsequently, the aim of this paper is to unbox ‘knowledge’ in knowledge collaboration by focusing specifically on how knowledge is understood by heterogenous actors during the process of generating knowledge. We build on insights from an in-depth case study and contribute to the literature on knowledge collaboration by bringing in theory on boundary work that specifically addresses the knowledge generation process. We argue that to better meet the expectations of collaboration, there is a need for more discussions and focus on the participating stakeholders’ heterogenous epistemological as well as ontological understanding.

  • 18. Klintman, Mikael
    et al.
    Grafström, Maria
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Stockholm Centre for Organizational Research (SCORE).
    Jonsson, Anna
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Stockholm Centre for Organizational Research (SCORE).
    The role of epistemic signalling in transdisciplinary knowledge production: Examples from the field of sustainable water management2020Report (Other academic)
    Abstract [en]

    The number of arrangements where academia collaborates with governmental and nongovernmental organisations, as well as industries, have increased over the last decades. While research has focused on whether knowledge produced in such collaborations is genuinely influenced by others than the ‘experts’, or those with the highest status and power, this report explores the influence of framings and re-framings of what the participants and society should perceive as the nature of knowledge: epistemology. We analyse the framings of epistemology through the concept ‘epistemic signalling’. Epistemic signalling refers to communication or rule-making that indicates what type(s) of knowledge is considered relevant, valuable or useful in knowledge collaboration. Empirically we draw on two examples of transdisciplinary collaborations in the field of water management (one from the UK and one from the US). In-depth interviews were combined with document analysis.

    We have analysed three themes of epistemic signalling that we suggest influence knowledge collaborations. The first one concerns how the form and theme of the collaboration were decided upon and is based on Arnstein’s (1969) ladder of participation. The second refers to what type(s) of participants were considered suitable – as for example experts or lay people. Here we use the framework of aggregate (bargaining-oriented) versus integrative (deliberative) processes of knowledge collaboration in our analysis. The third and last theme concerns what is perceived as valuable and successful in the collaborations, something that we discuss in terms of procedural and epistemic virtues of knowledge collaborations.

    The epistemology of organisations and participants in knowledge collaborations ought to be a distinct subject of open discussions from the earliest planning stage and onwards. It is easy to assume that epistemic signalling would be esoteric parts of practical, collaborative knowledge production. To the contrary, open epistemological reflections may help highlight situations where hierarchies turn out to be remains of routines inconsistent with new goals of more profound exchange of practical and scientific knowledge. In such cases, the epistemologies need to be revised to better fit the new goals.

    Download full text (pdf)
    fulltext
  • 19. Klintman, Mikael
    et al.
    Jonsson, Anna
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Social Anthropology, Stockholm Centre for Organizational Research (SCORE). Lund University, Sweden.
    Grafström, Maria
    Torgilsson, Petra
    Academia and society in collaborative knowledge production towards urban sustainability: several schemes—three common crossroads2022In: Environment, Development and Sustainability, ISSN 1387-585X, E-ISSN 1573-2975Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    Arrangements for collaboration in knowledge production across academia, government, non-governmental organisations, and corporations have several names, such as citizen-science, community-based participatory research, engaged research and hybrid forums. The multiplicity of schemes does not lie only in the high number of names for various versions of collaborative knowledge production. Different scholars also use concepts in multiple ways, depending on their individual choices, mother disciplines, and the problem area in which collaboration occurs. At the same time, there is a lack of analytical tools that address the full range of collaborative research schemes and provide a systematic set of questions to learn about the schemes, challenges, and opportunities. Based on our review of academic journal articles highlighting collaborative research schemes, this paper aims to analyse three parameters which it is fair to say that virtually all arrangements of collaborative knowledge production ought to consider when making decisions, parameters that are often partially missed or misunderstood: (A) epistemic-procedural, (B) exclusive-inclusive and (C) aggregative-integrative. By examining the three parameters, their political theory origins, and how they connect to and challenge existing schemes of knowledge collaboration, we provide analytical tools that could facilitate processes of developing and scrutinising arrangements of collaborative research. 

  • 20.
    Maria, Grafström
    et al.
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Social Anthropology, Stockholm Centre for Organizational Research (SCORE).
    Jonsson, Anna
    Från “fund and forget” till ”ringar på vattnet”: Uppföljning av Formas kommunikations- och nyttiggörandeutlysningar2023Report (Other academic)
  • 21.
    Maria, Grafström
    et al.
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Social Anthropology, Stockholm Centre for Organizational Research (SCORE).
    Jonsson, Anna
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Social Anthropology, Stockholm Centre for Organizational Research (SCORE).
    Stig, Oline
    Strannegård, Lars
    En berättelse om organisering2022 (ed. 2)Book (Other academic)
    Abstract [sv]

    En berättelse om organisering blandar organisationsteorins grunder med berättelsen om modeföretaget Mess. Genom skildringen av människorna och händelserna i och runt företaget ser vi framgångar, konflikter och utmaningar i organisationsteorins ljus. Mötet mellan den fiktiva berättelsen och organisationsteorins grundläggande teman ger en förståelse för vad en organisation är och vad organisering betyder – och vilken betydelse det har för att förstå vårt samhälle. I den här andra upplagan har boken kortats och omdisponerats så att några av de tidigare temana har vävts samman med de övriga. För att komplettera och stärka berättelsen om Mess har exempel – både från praktiken och från aktuell forskning – genomgående uppdaterats.

1 - 21 of 21
CiteExportLink to result list
Permanent link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf