Change search
Refine search result
1 - 14 of 14
CiteExportLink to result list
Permanent link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Rows per page
  • 5
  • 10
  • 20
  • 50
  • 100
  • 250
Sort
  • Standard (Relevance)
  • Author A-Ö
  • Author Ö-A
  • Title A-Ö
  • Title Ö-A
  • Publication type A-Ö
  • Publication type Ö-A
  • Issued (Oldest first)
  • Issued (Newest first)
  • Created (Oldest first)
  • Created (Newest first)
  • Last updated (Oldest first)
  • Last updated (Newest first)
  • Disputation date (earliest first)
  • Disputation date (latest first)
  • Standard (Relevance)
  • Author A-Ö
  • Author Ö-A
  • Title A-Ö
  • Title Ö-A
  • Publication type A-Ö
  • Publication type Ö-A
  • Issued (Oldest first)
  • Issued (Newest first)
  • Created (Oldest first)
  • Created (Newest first)
  • Last updated (Oldest first)
  • Last updated (Newest first)
  • Disputation date (earliest first)
  • Disputation date (latest first)
Select
The maximal number of hits you can export is 250. When you want to export more records please use the Create feeds function.
  • 1.
    Marusic, Branka
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Law, Department of Law.
    End Line: The Boundaries of Extended Protection for Word Trademarks in EU Law2014In: NIR: Nordiskt immateriellt rättsskydd, ISSN 0027-6723, no 5, p. 537-561Article in journal (Other academic)
    Abstract [en]

    The well-known marks are used as a safety valve in the protection and preservation of the commercial value of trademarks. It is a shield, available to trader to protect its financial investment in the allure of the trademark, and a sword against anyone who wants to engage in free riding on this investment. The overall analysis of the boundaries of extended protection for trademarks in the form of remedies, demonstrates that a trader cannot rely on a well-known mark status without any obligations attached to it. The whole idea of this article rests upon access points for interested third parties, to word embedded in the well-known mark. This article introduces two access points, independently developed from the European trademark framework, that have as an underlying idea the protection of market principles and other traders, rather than the protection of the trademark owner. The problem of well-known marks and their interaction with market principles derives from a simple fact that the basis for their protection rests upon the suggestive function of the trademark. This suggestive function needs to be curtailed in order for the proper functioning of the market to occur. Curtailment occurs in the form of boundaries to its protection, in the form of access points. These access points have been grouped in two areas. Firstly the general principles of EU law, and secondly the competition law.

  • 2.
    Marusic, Branka
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Law, Department of Law.
    Gate Keeper or Trespasser? EU ISP Liability Regime and its Privacy Implications2016In: NIR: Nordiskt immateriellt rättsskydd, ISSN 0027-6723, no 1, p. 4-17Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    The case Google Spain decided in front of the CJEU provides for just one example of an infinite number of occasions in which parties such as end users, content owners and rights management organisations have sought to assign intermediaries/Internet Service Providers (ISPs) with liability for infringements perpetrated online. Internet actors often look to ISPs as the gatekeepers of the web and therefore the most suitable party to be held liable in relation to illegal online activity, whether it is in relation to economic or fundamental rights and interests. Accordingly, this article provides an overview of the ever-shifting notion of ISP liability in the online digital environment in light of the Google Spain decision, in a specific attempt to answer the following question: how far are we willing to affect the functioning of ISPs through their liability for online activity in order to install order in an unruly digital arena?

  • 3.
    Marusic, Branka
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Law, Department of Law.
    Obergericht für Patent- und Markenrecht (Patent- och marknadsöverdomstolen) 24.1.2018 – PMFT 2585-17: Urheberrechtsverletzung geschützter Werke, die in einer Gerichtsverhandlung kopiert und vorgelegt wurden? – Copyrighted material as evidence (m. Anm. Marusic)2019In: Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht. Internationaler Teil, ISSN 0435-8600, Vol. 68, no 5, p. 514-517Article in journal (Other academic)
  • 4.
    Marusic, Branka
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Law, Department of Law.
    Oberster Gerichtshof 22.12.2017 – B 2787-16: Domainnamen als Eigentum im Sinne des Urheberrechtsgesetzes – Pirate Bay2018In: Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht. Internationaler Teil, ISSN 0435-8600, Vol. 67, no 11, p. 1068-1070Article in journal (Other academic)
    Abstract [en]

    Translation and case note Pirate Bay B 2787-16 (Högsta domstolen).

  • 5.
    Marusic, Branka
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Law, Department of Law.
    Oberster Gerichtshof (Högsta domstolen) 21.1.2019 – B 1540-18: Angemessener Schadensersatz bei Urheberrechtsverletzungen durch Online-Streaming von Filmen – dreamfilm (m. Anm. Marusic)2019In: Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht. Internationaler Teil, ISSN 0435-8600, Vol. 68, no 10, p. 962-965Article in journal (Other academic)
    Abstract [en]

    Translation and case note in case B 1540-18 (Dreamfilm).

  • 6.
    Marusic, Branka
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Law, Department of Law.
    Oberster Gerichtshof (Högsta Domstolen) 21.2.2017 – T 1963-15 Die Grenzen zwischen der Bearbeitung urheberrechtlich geschützter Werke und neuen Schöpfungen – Swedish Scapegoats2019In: Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht. Internationaler Teil, ISSN 0435-8600, Vol. 68, no 1, p. 93-95Article in journal (Other academic)
    Abstract [en]

    Translation and case note on the Swedish Scapegoats Case T 1963-15 (Högsta domstolen).

  • 7.
    Marusic, Branka
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Law, Department of Law.
    Oberster Gerichtshof (Högsta domstolen) 25.9.2018 – T 1738-17 Passive Speicherung eines lizenzierten Computerprogramms – City of Malmö v. Alfa Kommun & Landsting (m. Anm. Marusic)2019In: Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht. Internationaler Teil, ISSN 0435-8600, Vol. 68, no 7, p. 717-720Article in journal (Other academic)
  • 8.
    Marusic, Branka
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Law, Department of Law.
    Oberster Gerichtshof (Högsta Domstolen) 29.12.2017 – T 3973-15: Entschädigung für private Kopiergeräte – Sony Mobile Communications2019In: Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht. Internationaler Teil, ISSN 0435-8600, Vol. 68, no 2, p. 193-197Article in journal (Other academic)
    Abstract [en]

    Translation and case note Sony Mobile Communications T 3973-15 (Högsta domstolen).

  • 9.
    Marusic, Branka
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Law, Department of Law.
    Supreme Court (Högsta domstolen) 12.6.2017 – B 3878-15: Auswahl der Sanktionen beim Verstoß gegen das Urheberrecht – Swepirate / Biosalongen2018In: Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht. Internationaler Teil, ISSN 0435-8600, Vol. 67, no 2, p. 185-188Article in journal (Other academic)
  • 10.
    Marusic, Branka
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Law, Department of Law.
    Supreme Court (Högsta domstolen), 28.05.2019 - B 5089-16: Copyright infringement through the storage of protected goods intended for sale - Mr Syed (m. Anm. Marusic)2020In: Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht. Internationaler Teil, ISSN 0435-8600, Vol. 69, no 1, p. 64-67Article in journal (Other academic)
    Abstract [en]

    The storage by a retailer of goods bearing a motif protected by copyright may constitute an infringement of the exclusive distribution right when that retailer offers for sale, without the authorisation of the copyright holder, goods identical to those which he is storing, provided that the stored goods are actually intended for sale.

  • 11.
    Marusic, Branka
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Law, Department of Law.
    Testing the Competence Divide: A Short Story how the CJEU Annulled a National Measure of a Member State2019In: Europarättslig tidskrift, ISSN 1403-8722, no 3, p. 479-485Article in journal (Other academic)
    Abstract [en]

    With the judgement in joined cases C‑202/18 and C‑238/18 (Ilmārs Rimšēvičs) the CJEU for the first time annulled a national measure. However, this case needs to be seen in its context, and that is that the CJEU shaped a direct form of remedial action of annulment of a national measure. Furthermore, this remedial action is very narrow in its scope of application and in can only be applied only to relieved governors of National Central Banks in the Eurozone Member States of the EU (in 2019 that was 19 countries).

  • 12.
    Marusic, Branka
    et al.
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Law, Department of Law.
    Juric, Marko
    Reproduciranje autorskog djela za privatno i drugo vlastito korištenje u svjetlu prava Europske unije [Reproduction of copyright protected works for private and other personal use in the light of European Union law]2016In: Zbornik Hrvatskog društva za autorsko pravo, ISSN 1333-4328, Vol. 13-14, p. 31-56Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    This paper analyses the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union (‘CJEU’) concerning the exceptions referred to in Article 5 paragraph 2 points a) and b) of the Directive on Information Society. In this paper, the legal opinions of the CJEU are presented on the nature of the damage suffered by the right holders in cases of private reproduction as well as fair compensation, margin of discretion enjoyed by the EU Member States when regulating the private copying exception, the possibility of charging fees in cases of cross-border sales of media and devices, the sources from which it is possible to legally reproduce a work for private use, the use of the funds collected on the basis of compensation for private copying, the impact of the application of technical measures in the system of private copying and the (im)possibility of the application of the system of private copying when downloading works. The need to review the national practices in exercising rights deriving from the field of copyright and related rights taking into considerations the legal opinions of the CJEU, is emphasised.

  • 13.
    Marušić, Branka
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Law, Department of Law.
    Author’s Right to Choose: Right of Divulgation in the Online Digital Single Market of the EU2020In: EU Internet Law in the Digital Era: Regulation and Enforcement / [ed] Tatiana-Eleni Synodinou, Philippe Jougleux, Christiana Markou, Thalia Prastitou, Springer, 2020, p. 137-160Chapter in book (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    This chapter provides an analysis in the material scope of application of the moral right of divulgation and the economic right of communication to the public in the EU’s digital single market. The aim is to bring forward arguments why the application of both rights should only be addressed through the protection afforded by the economic right. The rationale behind this is that the right of divulgation, as a moral right of the author, and the right of communication to the public, as an economic right of the author, both share the same trigger point for their application. This trigger point consists of the author’s choice in sharing her or his work with the public, in which the author of the work also chooses the manner, shape and place where this sharing will occur.

    Unlike the economic right of communication to the public, which has been harmonised in the EU, the right of divulgation, as a moral right is deeply rooted in the national legislative and judicial interpretation of the Member States that recognise this moral right of the authors. In line with this and for this chapter, analysis of the material scope of the application of the right of divulgation is evaluated through the monistic and dualistic approach to the regulation of copyright, and the jurisdictions that are analysed are primarily France and Germany.

    Against this background, the analysis in the chapter provides for overlapping interpretational criteria of both rights that encompass an act of sharing, the definition of what the public is, and what the modes of dissemination of work are.

  • 14.
    Marušić, Branka
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Law, Department of Law.
    Derogating Regulative and Enforcement Powers in Copyright Protection in the Digital Market: A Trojan Horse for the EU?2017In: Croatian Yearbook of European Law & Policy, ISSN 1845-5662, E-ISSN 1848-9958, Vol. 13, p. 169-190Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    The proposal for a Directive on Copyright in the Digital Market contains a proposal to harmonise protection of copyright in the digital market and to close the so-called 'value gap'. The value gap is a term that, in the realm of online copyright dissemination, signifies a situation where the right holder (for example, the author of a song) is not adequately remunerated for his or her work. This situation usually occurs when his or her song is made available on an online platform, such as YouTube, and he or she is not paid for the use and enjoyment of the work. The current market mechanism to tackle this problem is done via licensing schemes.

    This paper will analyse the possible Trojan horse that is hidden in this proposal in order to ask whether, when it comes to online regulation and enforcement of copyright, the deployment of article 114 TFEU is the correct legal basis for the EU to enhance accountability of internet service providers in the regulation and enforcement of copyright.

1 - 14 of 14
CiteExportLink to result list
Permanent link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf