Change search
Refine search result
1 - 10 of 10
CiteExportLink to result list
Permanent link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Rows per page
  • 5
  • 10
  • 20
  • 50
  • 100
  • 250
Sort
  • Standard (Relevance)
  • Author A-Ö
  • Author Ö-A
  • Title A-Ö
  • Title Ö-A
  • Publication type A-Ö
  • Publication type Ö-A
  • Issued (Oldest first)
  • Issued (Newest first)
  • Created (Oldest first)
  • Created (Newest first)
  • Last updated (Oldest first)
  • Last updated (Newest first)
  • Disputation date (earliest first)
  • Disputation date (latest first)
  • Standard (Relevance)
  • Author A-Ö
  • Author Ö-A
  • Title A-Ö
  • Title Ö-A
  • Publication type A-Ö
  • Publication type Ö-A
  • Issued (Oldest first)
  • Issued (Newest first)
  • Created (Oldest first)
  • Created (Newest first)
  • Last updated (Oldest first)
  • Last updated (Newest first)
  • Disputation date (earliest first)
  • Disputation date (latest first)
Select
The maximal number of hits you can export is 250. When you want to export more records please use the Create feeds function.
  • 1.
    Andersson, Jan
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Law, Department of Law.
    A Legislator’s Inability to Legislate Different Species: A Swedish Case Study Concerning Mutual Insurance Companies2019In: Managing Hybrid Organizations: Governance, Professionalism and Regulation / [ed] Susanna Alexius, Staffan Furusten, Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2019, p. 305-320Chapter in book (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    This chapter aims to contribute by focusing on legislation for the Swedish insurance industry in general and mutual insurance companies in particular. The Swedish legislation concerning insurance companies is twofold. The purpose of the case study is to investigate whether and, if so, to what extent the legislation differs as regards the regulation of different insurance companies and to what extent this regulatory discrepancy creates unwanted transaction costs and a divided level playing field for mutual insurance companies. Furthermore, this chapter aims to offer a short note on the idea of whether an alternative legislative scenario including a “separate law regime” and/or a “choice of law regime” could possibly benefit mutual insurance companies.

  • 2.
    Andersson, Jan
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Law, Department of Law.
    Exit in Private Companies – An Overview2017In: Shareholders' Duties / [ed] Hanne S. Birkmose, Kluwer Law International, 2017, p. 331-346Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 3.
    Andersson, Jan
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Law, Department of Law.
    Is Sweden an investor-friendly jurisdiction? A critical analysisManuscript (preprint) (Other academic)
  • 4.
    Andersson, Jan
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Law, Department of Law.
    Olovlig värdeöverföring och koncernbidrag i HD – mekanisk juridisk verkstad eller rättspolitisk designbyrå?2017In: Juridisk Tidskrift, ISSN 1100-7761, no 1, p. 124-136Article in journal (Other academic)
  • 5.
    Andersson, Jan
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Law, Department of Law.
    Om s.k eventstudierManuscript (preprint) (Other academic)
  • 6.
    Andersson, Jan
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Law, Department of Law.
    The Making of Company Law in Scandinavia and Europe: Experimentation and Innovation versus Harmonization2015In: German and Nordic Perspectives on Company Law and Capital Markets Law / [ed] Holger Fleischer, Jesper Lau Hansen, Wolf-Georg Ringe, Tubingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2015, p. 27-38Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 7.
    Besher, Alexander R.
    et al.
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Law, Department of Law.
    Andersson, Jan
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Law, Department of Law.
    VD:s roll i försäkringsföretag: En konsekvensanalys av två förslagför genomförandet av Solvens II2016In: Juridisk Tidskrift, ISSN 1100-7761, no 2, p. 273-298Article in journal (Other academic)
    Abstract [sv]

    Det försäkringsrättsliga EU-direktivet (Solvens II), ska implementeras och börja tillämpas senast vid ingången av 2016. Ett lagförslag har framlagts dels i ett betänkande av Solvens II-utredningen (Betänkandet), dels i en proposition (2015 års prop.) till riksdagen så sent som den 23 sep 2015. Vi företräder åsikten att lagförslagen, dock i olika utsträckningar, inte är förenliga med grundläggande aktiebolagsrättsliga principer varpå företagsstyrningen vilar och leder till kontradiktorisk lagstiftning, inte minst i ansvarshänseende för de förvaltande bolagsorganen. Syftet med denna artikel är att belysa Betänkandets lagförslag i vad avser implementering av direktivets artiklar 40–50 i ljuset av det svenska företagsstyrningssystemet, där ansvarsfördelningen mellan de förvaltande bolagsorganen är av styrande vikt, särskilt beträffande den verkställande direktörens (VD:ns) roll. Vi ska i det följande även jämföra lagförslagen sinsemellan,belysa de problem vi ser med förslagen, klargöra det som anses vara vedertaget på området, samt presentera en alternativ lösning som är följdriktig med vad som enligt vår uppfattning får betraktas som svensk gällande associationsrätt.

  • 8. Krüger Andersen, Paul
    et al.
    Andersson, Jan
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Law, Department of Law.
    de Kluiver, H. J.
    European Model Companies Act (EMCA)2017Report (Other academic)
  • 9. Sund, Lars-Göran
    et al.
    Andersson, Jan
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Law, Department of Law.
    Haag, Kajsa
    Share Transfer Restrictions and Family Business: The Minority Shareholder Perspective2015In: European Business Law Review, ISSN 0959-6941, E-ISSN 1875-841X, Vol. 26, no 3, p. 437-450Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    Small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), of which most are family-owned businesses (FOBs), play a substantial part in any nation’s economy. They are, in many ways, different from large companies with scattered ownership; therefore, further developments accounting for their special circumstances are needed. We study shareholder protection and aim to narrow the gap between theory and practice regarding commercial law in relation to the FOBs. An entrepreneurially friendly environment presupposes that owners can protect their ownership positions against unwanted acquisitions of shares, and not be unwillingly locked-in in a position as minority owners. This requires legal rules that are neither unnecessarily costly, nor time and energy consuming to comply with. Legislators should thus provide a set of rules that facilitates owners to effectively avoid both unwanted acquisitions of shares and locked-in positions. We conclude that default rules, such as a right of first refusal, should be included in the articles of association. We also find it important to allow clauses that enhance the possibility of avoiding locked-in positions, where most national legislations today permit only clauses that contribute to the protection of ownership positions.

  • 10.
    Sveen, Daniel
    et al.
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Law, Department of Law.
    Andersson, Jan
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Law, Department of Law.
    Skyddet för investerare efter BDO-domen: Bör investerare överhuvudtaget bry sig om svenska börsnoterade aktier?2017In: Juridisk Tidskrift, ISSN 1100-7761, E-ISSN 2002-3545, no 1, p. 233-260Article in journal (Other academic)
1 - 10 of 10
CiteExportLink to result list
Permanent link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf