Change search
Refine search result
1 - 24 of 24
CiteExportLink to result list
Permanent link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Rows per page
  • 5
  • 10
  • 20
  • 50
  • 100
  • 250
Sort
  • Standard (Relevance)
  • Author A-Ö
  • Author Ö-A
  • Title A-Ö
  • Title Ö-A
  • Publication type A-Ö
  • Publication type Ö-A
  • Issued (Oldest first)
  • Issued (Newest first)
  • Created (Oldest first)
  • Created (Newest first)
  • Last updated (Oldest first)
  • Last updated (Newest first)
  • Disputation date (earliest first)
  • Disputation date (latest first)
  • Standard (Relevance)
  • Author A-Ö
  • Author Ö-A
  • Title A-Ö
  • Title Ö-A
  • Publication type A-Ö
  • Publication type Ö-A
  • Issued (Oldest first)
  • Issued (Newest first)
  • Created (Oldest first)
  • Created (Newest first)
  • Last updated (Oldest first)
  • Last updated (Newest first)
  • Disputation date (earliest first)
  • Disputation date (latest first)
Select
The maximal number of hits you can export is 250. When you want to export more records please use the Create feeds function.
  • 1. Lopez Munoz, Juan Manuel
    et al.
    Marnette, SophieRosier, LaurenceRoitman, MalinStockholm University, Faculty of Humanities, Department of Romance Studies and Classics.Sullet-Nylander, FrancoiseStockholm University, Faculty of Humanities, Department of Romance Studies and Classics.
    Discours rapporté: Une question de genre?2015Collection (editor) (Refereed)
  • 2. Lopez Munoz, Juan-Manuel
    et al.
    Marnette, Sophie
    Rosier, Laurence
    Sullet-Nylander, Francoise
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Humanities, Department of Romance Studies and Classics.
    Roitman, Malin
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Humanities, Department of Romance Studies and Classics.
    Les discours littéraires à la lumière de l’articulation entre genre sexué et discours rapporté2015In: Le discours rapporté: une question de genre? / [ed] Juan-Manuel Lopez Munoz, Sophie Marnette, Laurence Rosier, Malin Roitman, Francoise Sullet-Nylander, Editions EME, 2015, p. 7-11Chapter in book (Refereed)
  • 3.
    Lopez-Munoz, Juan-Manuel
    et al.
    Universidad de Cádiz, Cadiz, Spanien.
    Marnette, SophieOxford University.Rosier, LaurenceUniversité Libre de Bruxelles, Belgien.Roitman, MalinStockholm University, Faculty of Humanities, Department of Romance Studies and Classics. Romanska och klassiska institutionen, Stockholms universitet.Sullet-Nylander, FrancoiseStockholm University, Faculty of Humanities, Department of Romance Studies and Classics. Romanska och klassiska institutionen, Stockholms universitet.
    Le discours rapporté: une question de genre?2015Collection (editor) (Refereed)
  • 4.
    Roitman, Malin
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Humanities, Department of Romance Studies and Classics.
    Configuration polyphonique et stratégie rhétorique: Etude sur l'emploi de la négation "ne...pas" dans des éditoriaux du "Figaro", de "Libération" et du "Monde"2003In: Actas del XXIII Congreso Internacionál de Lingüística y Filología Románica [23. 2001. Salamanca]: Vol.2 T.2 / [ed] Fernando Sánchez Miret (éd)., Tübingen: Max Niemeyer, 2003, p. 271-284Chapter in book (Refereed)
  • 5.
    Roitman, Malin
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Humanities, Department of Romance Studies and Classics.
    Configuration polyphonique et stratégie rhétorique. : Étude de l’emploi de la négation ne…pas dans des éditoriaux du Figaro, de Libération et du Monde.2004Licentiate thesis, monograph (Other academic)
  • 6.
    Roitman, Malin
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Humanities, Department of French, Italian and Classical Languages, French and Italian.
    Constructing One’s Arguments Based on Refutations of the Other’s Discourse: A Study of the Traditional Presidential Debate: Chirac/Jospin (1995) Versus Sarkozy/Royal (2007)2015In: Argumentation: an international journal on reasoning, ISSN 0920-427X, E-ISSN 1572-8374, Vol. 29, no 1, p. 19-32Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    This study focuses on the use and function of refutation in two televised debates during which candidates who have reached the second round of the French presidential elections come face to face. The aim of this study is to examine the forms and functions of refutation within the theoretical framework of dialogism. The rhetorical-argumentative functions of refutation and the challenges of this discursive practice in the genre ‘‘televised political debate’’ will also be put forward.

  • 7.
    Roitman, Malin
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Humanities, Department of French, Italian and Classical Languages.
    Construire son argumentation sur la réfutation du discours de l’autre: les débats de l’entre-deux-tours2013In: La Linguistique dans tous les sens / [ed] Françoise Sullet-Nylander, Hugues Engel, Gunnel Engwall, Stockholm: Kungl. Vitterhets Historie och Antikvitets Akademien, 2013, p. 191-206Chapter in book (Refereed)
  • 8.
    Roitman, Malin
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Humanities, Department of Romance Studies and Classics.
    Genrekrav, argumentativa strategier och textuell polyfoni i ledargenren: Den franska negationen ne2007In: Sproglig polyfoni: tekster om Bachtin og ScaPoLine / [ed] Møller Andersen, N., Nølke, H. et Therkelsen, R., Århus: Aarhus Universitetsforlag, 2007, p. 249-253Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 9.
    Roitman, Malin
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Humanities, Department of Romance Studies and Classics.
    Introduction: The nature of negation – At the Crossroads between Truth-value Operator and Speech Act2017In: The Pragmatics of Negation: negative meanings, uses and discursive functions / [ed] Malin Roitman, Amsterdam:: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2017Chapter in book (Refereed)
  • 10.
    Roitman, Malin
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Humanities, Department of Romance Studies and Classics.
    Negation and straw man fallacy in French election debates 1974–20122017In: The Pragmatics of Negation: negative meanings, uses and discursive functions / [ed] Malin Roitman, Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2017Chapter in book (Refereed)
  • 11.
    Roitman, Malin
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Humanities, Department of Romance Studies and Classics.
    Négation: élément de réfutation et stratégie argumentative2011In: La négation en discours: actes du colloque / facultés des lettres et des sciences humaines de Sousse et de Kairouan / [ed] Jacqueline Bacha, Ammar Azouzi, Khaled Saddem, Sousse: Université de Sousse , 2011Chapter in book (Refereed)
  • 12.
    Roitman, Malin
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Humanities, Department of Romance Studies and Classics.
    Polyphonie textuelle et stratégies argumentatives de l’éditorial: Le cas de la négation de phrase2009In: La polyphonie: outil heuristique linguistique, littéraire et culturel / [ed] Alexandra Kratschmer, Merete Birkelund, Rita Therkelsen, Berlin: Frank & Timme, 2009, p. 125-144Chapter in book (Refereed)
  • 13.
    Roitman, Malin
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Humanities, Department of Romance Studies and Classics.
    Presidential candidates' ethos of credibility: The case of the presidential pronoun/in the 2012 Hollande-Sarkozy debate2014In: Discourse & Society, ISSN 0957-9265, E-ISSN 1460-3624, Vol. 25, no 6, p. 741-765Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    The traditional televised debate remains a decisive event in the French presidential elections. This study aims to examine the ways in which French presidential candidates in 2012 reinforce their credibility, their ethos. More specifically, I will study the use of the pronoun I as used in the debate by the candidates, a text element that refers to a physically present I behind the discourse. This pronoun is essential in the 'self-presentation' being developed by candidates in the debates. So, I try to categorize the different types of 'I' relating to the concepts of, for example, solidarity, commitment, authority, patriotism. Second, I will analyze the relationship between ethos and rhetorical use of the French sentential negation ne. pas, the most significant and frequently used counter-argumentative tool used in electoral debates. My studies have shown that counter-argumentation by negation is a relevant parameter for determining the type of text (polemic) and the genre (political debate). The study therefore aims to highlight the relationship between constructions of credibility as presented through the candidates' use of I, on the one hand, and the refutation of one or the other candidate's arguments, on the other. This study is based on an assumption of the theory of polyphony that the sentence negation stratifies the utterance into two points of view that are hierarchically organized and semantically opposed: one that refutes and the other being refuted. My assumption is that candidates build ethos by developing a counter-image of the other candidate. Using the negation then allows the candidates to refer to a negative image of their protagonists, while at the same time providing a positive image of themselves: 'I would not call my Prime Minister a traitor' (Holland, 2012). Sentence negation also seems to be used to save their own ethos, which is the case when candidate A refutes an argument (from candidate B) which discriminates the positive image of candidate A: 'Of course I do not take all the credit, but I also do not take all the blame Mr Hollande' (Sarkozy, 2012). These types of examples show that the form ‘I’ in relation to the function of negation is relevant to an examination of the ethos rhetoric of the candidates.

  • 14.
    Roitman, Malin
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Humanities, Department of Romance Studies and Classics.
    The Pragmatics of Negation: Negative meanings, uses and discursive functions2017Collection (editor) (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    Negation is one of the most discussed phenomena within linguistics, on all language levels though it never seems to be exhausted. This operator establishes complex sentence structures and constantly challenges – from a cognitive, syntactical, semantic and morphologic viewpoint – presuppositions on language internal relations as rational and logic. It therefore arouses interest through all fields within language sciences. From a pragmatic perspective, where negation is conceived a marked structure, using negation often produces meanings beyond the one of a reversed affirmation "it is not the case that X”. This book explores the various uses and pragmatic meanings of negation in authentic communication, in different text types and in different languages, predominately romance languages. The multilingual composition marries a macro-micro perspective where aspects of genre, sociocultural context, memory, rhetoric and argumentation interplay with the negative morpheme’s nature and embedded instructions. This broad approach makes this book a unique contribution to negation studies and to pragmatics in general. The book is important and enriching reading for scholars in all linguistic domains, but particularly for researchers in semantics, pragmatics, argumentation and, discourse analysis.

  • 15.
    Sullet-Nylander, Francoise
    et al.
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Humanities, Department of Romance Studies and Classics.
    Roitman, Malin
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Humanities, Department of Romance Studies and Classics.
    La (dé)nomination du « peuple français » par Emmanuel Macron et Marine Le Pen Débat de l’entre-deux-tours du 3 mai 2017: une étude lexicale et sémantique2019In: Bergen Language and Lingustics Studies, ISSN 1892-2449, E-ISSN 1892-2449, Vol. 10, no 1, article id 12Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    In the proposed article, the authors investigate how the candidates to the French presidential elections, Emmanuel Macron and Marine Le Pen, named their fellow citizens, what types of denominations the two candidates used when referring to the French people during the TV-debate which took place in May 2017. The authors have carried out several discourse analytic studies on the final debate of the French presidential elections(Sullet-Nylander & Roitman 2010a, 2010b, 2011 and 2016).This new study deals with the concepts of denomination and/or nominationwithin a discourse analytic framework based on theoretical models and definitions by Kleiber (2001) and Siblot (2001). The identification of “les paradigmes désignationnels” (Charaudeau & Maingueneau 2002: 415) enables the collection of relevant semantic and lexical information related to this specific genre and discourse type. The analyses are quantitative and qualitative as well as comparative (between the two candidates). The following research questions are addressed: How do both candidates refer to French people during their exchanges? Do the differences in the frequency of a particular denomination depend on the political orientation of the candidates? What electoral strategies can be linked to these (de)nominations? The results show several differences between the two candidates, one of which the most salient beingMarine Le Pen’s use of the lexeme “compatriotes” while Macron prefers “concitoyens”.

  • 16.
    Sullet-Nylander, Francoise
    et al.
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Humanities, Department of Romance Studies and Classics.
    Roitman, MalinStockholm University, Faculty of Humanities, Department of Romance Studies and Classics.Lopez-Munoz, Juan-ManuelMarnette, SophieRosier, Laurence
    Discours rapporté, genre(s) et médias2014Collection (editor) (Refereed)
    Abstract [fr]

    Les problématiques traitées dans ce volume, comportant quinze articles, relèvent du discours rapporté et des genres - gender et genres textuels et discursifs - dans les corpus médiatiques. La plus grande partie des contributions y figurant ont été présentées au colloque "Rapporter et être rapporté.e : une affaire de genre(s) ?" organisé en collaboration avec le groupe de recherche international Ci-dit et tenu à l'Université de Stockholm du 14 au 16 juin 2012.

  • 17.
    Sullet-Nylander, Francoise
    et al.
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Humanities, Department of Romance Studies and Classics.
    Roitman, Malin
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Humanities, Department of Romance Studies and Classics.
    Lopez-Munoz, Juan-Manuel
    Marnette, Sophie
    Rosier, Laurence
    Introduction2014In: Discours rapporté, genre(s) et médias, Stockholm: Stockholm University, 2014, p. 7-11Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 18.
    Sullet-Nylander, Françoise
    et al.
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Humanities, Department of Romance Studies and Classics.
    Bernal, MaríaStockholm University, Faculty of Humanities, Department of Romance Studies and Classics.Premat, ChristopheStockholm University, Faculty of Humanities, Department of Romance Studies and Classics.Roitman, MalinStockholm University, Faculty of Humanities, Department of Romance Studies and Classics.
    Political Discourses at the Extremes: Expressions of Populism in Romance-Speaking Countries2019Collection (editor) (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    The authors of this edited volume focus on the emergence of populist discourses, coming from  movements or parties from Romance-speaking countries in Europe and in Latin America. By combining  linguistics, social and political sciences in a discourse analytical approach, the sixteen papers  enlighten the mechanisms behind populist discourses yielding from different socio-cultural and  political contexts. The common denominator of the studies is the focus on the discursive and  rhetorical characteristics of recently emerged movements of populism in both continents.  Investigating expressions of these political movements is highly relevant in today’s society, where  the growing number of populist discourses has become a pre-eminent issue, alongside people’s  increasing insecurity regarding future political and environmental challenges. The primary audience  of this volume are researchers working in the fields of political discourse analysis; however, this  book may benefit anybody with interest in language in politics.

  • 19.
    Sullet-Nylander, Françoise
    et al.
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Humanities, Department of Romance Studies and Classics.
    Bernal, María
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Humanities, Department of Romance Studies and Classics.
    Premat, Christophe
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Humanities, Department of Romance Studies and Classics.
    Roitman, Malin
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Humanities, Department of Romance Studies and Classics.
    Populist Voices from Latin America to Europe2019In: Political Discourses at the Extremes: Expressions of Populism in Romance-Speaking Countries / [ed] Françoise Sullet-Nylander, María Bernal, Christophe Premat, Malin Roitman, Stockholm: Stockholm University Press, 2019, p. 1-11Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 20.
    Sullet-Nylander, Françoise
    et al.
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Humanities, Department of Romance Studies and Classics.
    Roitman, Malin
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Humanities, Department of Romance Studies and Classics.
    "But you are absolutly right, Mr Prime Minister": Terms of address and televised political debates between the ballots (1974-2012)2019In: Le Grain de la voix dans le monde anglophone et francophone / [ed] Michaël Abecassis, Marcelline Block, Gudrun Ledegen, Maribel Peñalver Vicea, Peter Lang Publishing Group, 2019Chapter in book (Refereed)
  • 21. Sullet-Nylander, Françoise
    et al.
    Roitman, Malin
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Humanities, Department of French, Italian and Classical Languages.
    De la confrontation politico-journalistique dans les grands duels politiques télévisés: questions et préconstruits2010In: Actes du colloque "Le français parlé dans les médias : les médias et le politique" (Lausanne / 2009) / [ed] Marcel Burger, Jérôme Jacquin, Raphaël Micheli (éds), Lausanne: [En ligne : http://www.unil.ch/clsl/page81503.html] , 2010Conference paper (Refereed)
  • 22.
    Sullet-Nylander, Françoise
    et al.
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Humanities, Department of French, Italian and Classical Languages.
    Roitman, Malin
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Humanities, Department of French, Italian and Classical Languages.
    Discours rapportés et débats télévisés: Étude comparative : Chirac/Jospin (1995) vs Sarkozy/Royal (2007)2011In: Citations II: Citer pour quoi faire ? Pragmatique de la citation / [ed] Anna Jaubert, Juan Manuel López Munoz, Sophie Marnette, Laurence Rosier et Claire Stolz (dir.), Louvain-La-Neuve: Harmattan-Academia s.a , 2011, p. 113-128Chapter in book (Refereed)
  • 23.
    Sullet-Nylander, Françoise
    et al.
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Humanities, Department of Romance Studies and Classics.
    Roitman, Malin
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Humanities, Department of Romance Studies and Classics.
    "Mais vous avez tout à fait raison M. le Premier ministre": Termes d’adresse et débats politiques télévisés de l’entre-deux-tours (1974–2012)2016In: Pragmática Sociocultural / Sociocultural Pragmatics, ISSN 2194-8313, Vol. 4, no 1, p. 1-24Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    “You are quite right Mr. Prime Minister!” Terms of address andtelevised political debates between the two turns of the Frenchpresidential elections (1974–2012).

    Since 1974, the TV-debate between the “finalists” before the second round of presidential elections has become an “institution” in France (1974: Giscard d‘Estaing / Mitterrand; 1981: Mitterrand / Giscard d’Estaing; 1988: Mitterrand / Chirac; 1995: Chirac / Jospin; 2007: Sarkozy / Royal and 2012: Sarkozy / Hollande). After having conducted several linguistic-discursive studies on the same corpus – especially on the modes of questioning, refutation and forms of reported speech –, the authors are interested here in terms of address used by both candidates face to face in the six debates mentioned above. The studies included in the book directed by Catherine Kerbrat-Orecchioni (2010), S’adresser à autrui. Les formes nominales d’adresse en français, have demonstrated that appellative practices vary considerably from one interactional genre to another. It seems then well justified to conduct a study, both quantitative and qualitative, on the evolution of these appellatives usages within the discursive genre of TV political debates, which cover a period of more than forty years. The authors look at the forms of terms of address (Monsieur +  patronymic, Madame +  patronymic, Monsieur le Premier ministre, etc.) and at the frequency with which they are used over the last four decades. The analyses also focus on the use of these forms in speech in allocution and / or in delocution and on the pragmatic functions played by these units in the debates.

  • 24.
    Sullet-Nylander, Françoise
    et al.
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Humanities, Department of French, Italian and Classical Languages.
    Roitman, Malin
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Humanities, Department of French, Italian and Classical Languages.
    Voix de campagne présidentielle: quelques observations sur la question et la réfutation dans le débat télévisé Royal-Sarkozy (2 mai 2007)2010In: Les voix des français: à travers l'histoire, l'école et la presse, vol. 1 / [ed] Michaël Abecassis, Gudrun Ledegen, Oxford: Peter Lang , 2010, p. 303-317Chapter in book (Other academic)
1 - 24 of 24
CiteExportLink to result list
Permanent link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf