Change search
Refine search result
1 - 18 of 18
CiteExportLink to result list
Permanent link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Rows per page
  • 5
  • 10
  • 20
  • 50
  • 100
  • 250
Sort
  • Standard (Relevance)
  • Author A-Ö
  • Author Ö-A
  • Title A-Ö
  • Title Ö-A
  • Publication type A-Ö
  • Publication type Ö-A
  • Issued (Oldest first)
  • Issued (Newest first)
  • Created (Oldest first)
  • Created (Newest first)
  • Last updated (Oldest first)
  • Last updated (Newest first)
  • Disputation date (earliest first)
  • Disputation date (latest first)
  • Standard (Relevance)
  • Author A-Ö
  • Author Ö-A
  • Title A-Ö
  • Title Ö-A
  • Publication type A-Ö
  • Publication type Ö-A
  • Issued (Oldest first)
  • Issued (Newest first)
  • Created (Oldest first)
  • Created (Newest first)
  • Last updated (Oldest first)
  • Last updated (Newest first)
  • Disputation date (earliest first)
  • Disputation date (latest first)
Select
The maximal number of hits you can export is 250. When you want to export more records please use the Create feeds function.
  • 1. Chamberlain, Johanna
    et al.
    Reichel, Jane
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Law, Department of Law.
    The Relationship Between Damages and Administrative Fines in the EU General Data Protection Regulation2019Report (Other academic)
    Abstract [en]

    Two purposes of the GDPR are to provide effective remedies for ensuring extensive personal data rights and to change practices and policies of controllers and processors so that they become more aware of privacy protection. Article 58 GDPR lays down the investigative and corrective powers of the national supervisory authorities, such as issuing warnings or imposing new administrative fines. Article 79 GDPR states that every data subject whose rights according to the regulation have been infringed shall have access to an effective remedy. The two measures in focus here are those with the largest economic impact: Article 82 on damages and Article 83 on administrative fines. These articles target different areas and subjects – while the first has a compensatory purpose and is designed for use by individuals, the second has a preventive character and is implemented by Data Protection Authorities vis-á-vis controllers and processors. Considering these two profiles, an interesting question arises: Why are the provisions of Article 83 for imposing fines on companies and organisations so detailed, while the wording of Article 82 and hence the liability for controllers and processors is open to interpretation? What does this difference lead to in the application of the regulation, and more precisely, is it likely that the development in regards to administrative fines could spill over to the application of rules on damages?

  • 2. Chamberlain, Johanna
    et al.
    Reichel, Jane
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Law, Department of Law.
    The Swedish Understanding of Privacy as a Fundamental Right in a Comparative Perspective — Overview and Possibilities2019In: Comparative Perspectives on Privacy in an Internet Era / [ed] Russell L. Weaver, Jane Reichel, Steven I. Friedland, Durham, North Carolina: Carolina Academic Press, 2019, p. 85-112Chapter in book (Refereed)
  • 3. Persson, Mats
    et al.
    Giertz, Magdalena
    Hellstadius, Åsa
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Law, Department of Law.
    Nilsson, Mattias
    Reichel, Jane
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Law, Department of Law.
    Sjödin, Erik
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, The Swedish Institute for Social Research (SOFI).
    Ågren, Jack
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Law, Department of Law.
    Åhman, Karin
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Law, Department of Law.
    Rättsfallssamling för Svensk juridik2019Book (Other academic)
  • 4. Persson, Mats
    et al.
    Giertz, Magdalena
    Hellstadius, Åsa
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Law, Department of Law.
    Nilsson, Mattias
    Reichel, Jane
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Law, Department of Law.
    Sjödin, Erik
    Ågren, Jack
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Law, Department of Law.
    Åhman, Karin
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Law, Department of Law.
    Straffrätt2017In: Svensk juridik / [ed] Mats Persson, Stockholm: Wolters Kluwer, 2017, p. 565-624Chapter in book (Other academic)
    Abstract [sv]

    Svensk juridik är en grundläggande lärobok i juridik där författarna på ett modernt, pedagogiskt och överskådligt sätt beskriver stora delar av det svenska rättssystemet. Boken går förhållandevis djupt för att vara en grundläggande lärobok, samtidigt som författarna lagt ner mycket arbete på att anpassa texten till modernt språkbruk. En mängd exempel och förklarande skisser gör det komplicerade mer lättillgängligt. Författarnas ambition är inte endast att läsaren ska få förståelse för juridiken utan även vinna insikt om hur juridiken används och fungerar i praktiken.

  • 5. Persson, Mats
    et al.
    Giertz, Magdalena
    Hellstadius, Åsa
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Law, Department of Law.
    Nilsson, Mattias
    Reichel, Jane
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Law, Department of Law.
    Sjödin, Erik
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, The Swedish Institute for Social Research (SOFI).
    Ågren, Jack
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Law, Department of Law.
    Åhman, Karin
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Law, Department of Law.
    Övningsbok för svensk juridik2019Book (Other academic)
  • 6.
    Reichel, Jane
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Law, Department of Law.
    A New Proposal for a Regulation on Mutual Recognition of Goods - Towards a Harmonized Administrative Order?2007Report (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.))
  • 7.
    Reichel, Jane
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Law, Department of Law.
    Allmänna handlingar och offentliga befattningshavares rätt till privatliv2020In: Ord och rätt: Festskrift till Hans-Gunnar Axberger / [ed] Anna Skarhed, Johan Hirschfeldt, Mikael Ruotsi & Daniel Westman, Visby: eddy.se , 2020, p. 451-479Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 8.
    Reichel, Jane
    Stockholm University.
    Between Supremacy and Autonomy: – Applying the Principle of Good Administration in the Member States2008In: General Principles of European Community. Law in a Process of Development, 2008Chapter in book (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.))
  • 9.
    Reichel, Jane
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Law, Department of Law.
    Europeiska principer för god förvaltning och 2017 års förvaltningslag2018In: Förvaltningsrättslig Tidskrift, ISSN 0015-8585, no 3, p. 423-441Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [sv]

    I artikeln behandlas införandet av en ny rubrik om ”grunderna för god förvaltning” i 2017 års FL, under vilken centrala rättsstatliga principer samt regler för service, tillgänglighet och samverkan har samlats. Principen om god förvaltning är sedan lång tid etablerad inom EU-rätten och förekommer även i dokument från Europarådet samt i viss utsträckning inom Europadomstolens praxis. I artikeln analyseras frågan hur den svenska versionen med ”grunderna för god förvaltning” förhåller sig till de europeiska principerna, vad gäller såväl innehåll som funktion av standard eller utkrävbar rättighet. I vad mån kan EU-domstolens senare praxis avseende tillämpningen av principen om god förvaltning på nationell nivå inverka på hur FL tolkas och tillämpas? Analysen görs mot bakgrund av de syften som reformen av FL har avsett att uppfylla, att stärka enskildas rättssäkerhet, införa ett mer heltäckande förfarande och att göra lagen mer lättillgänglig.

  • 10.
    Reichel, Jane
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Law, Department of Law.
    Offentlighet i en globaliserad värld2019In: Festskrift till Wiweka Warnling Conradson / [ed] Richard Arvidsson, Pernilla Leviner, Jane Reichel, Mauro Zamboni, Karin Åhman, Stockholm: jure , 2019, p. 335-376Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 11.
    Reichel, Jane
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Law, Department of Law.
    Public Access or Data Protection as a Guiding Principle in the EU's Composite Administration?: An Analysis of the ReNEUAL Model Code in the Light of Swedish and Europan Case Law2018In: Scandinavian Studies in Law, ISSN 0085-5944, Vol. 65, p. 285-308Article in journal (Other academic)
  • 12.
    Reichel, Jane
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Law, Department of Law.
    Rättstatsprincipen och sanktioner mot enskilda - kan medlemsstaterna låta EU bestämma?2019In: EU och nationalstatens återkomst / [ed] Antonina Bakardjieva Engelbrekt, Anna Michalski, Lars Oxelheim, Falun: Santérus förlag , 2019, p. 217-245Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 13.
    Reichel, Jane
    Stockholm University.
    Svensk livsmedelspolitik i EU: styrning och kontroll, Siepsrapport 2008:102008Report (Other academic)
  • 14.
    Reichel, Jane
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Law, Department of Law.
    Svenska myndigheter som EU-myndigheter2007In: Juridisk tidskrift, Vol. jubileumshäfte, p. 103-112Article in journal (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.))
  • 15.
    Reichel, Jane
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Law, Department of Law.
    The rule of law in the twilight zone: administrative sanctions within the European composite administration2019In: Administrative Law, Administrative Structures and Administrative Decisionmaking: Comparative Perspectives / [ed] Russell L. Weaver, Duncan Fairgrieve, Steven I. Friedland, Durham: Carolina Academic Press, 2019Chapter in book (Other academic)
    Abstract [en]

    In this article, I focus on the area of administrative sanctions within the European composite administration. Many pieces of secondary EU law contain requirements that member states are to provide effective deterrent measures in order to uphold respect for the material EU law provisions, but leave to the member states to apply their own rules on administrative sanctions. The practice of referring questions of sanctions to national law is a consequence of the reluctance displayed by the member states to hand over their sanctioning powers to the EU.Underthe case law of the European Court of Human Rights, administrative sanctions can on certain conditions be defined as criminal charges according to Article 6 of the European Convention of Human Rights, and must be handled accordingly. TheCourt of Justice of the European Union, CJEU, has followed thiscase law.The principle of legality is central in relation to criminal charges and penalties, a notion that is also acknowledged in Article 49 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights (EU Charter). By leaving the matter of regulating administrative sanctions to the member states, the sanctions can be applied under one comprehensive set of rules, within the legal system of the member state. However, according to well-established case law, member states are obliged to ensure that sanctions for infringements of provisions of union law are “effective, proportionate and dissuasive”. Further, the CJEU has on several occasions held that the general principles of EU law, as well as the EU Charter, are also applicable to national laws of sanction. In more recent secondary legislation, for example the General Data Protection Regulation, the EU has enacted rules that regulate how national laws on sanctions are to be applied. Even this area of the European composite administration is thereby becoming more integrated. 

  • 16. Slokenberga, Santa
    et al.
    Reichel, Jane
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Law, Department of Law. Uppsala University, Sweden.
    Niringiye, Rachel
    Croxton, Talishiea
    Swanepoel, Carmen
    Okal, June
    EU data transfer rules and African legal realities: is data exchange for biobank research realistic?2019In: International data privacy law, ISSN 2044-3994, Vol. 9, no 1, p. 30-48Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    Key Points

    • To effectively collaborate in biobanking and build capacity in low and middle-income countries, data transfer from European Union (EU) Member States to states in Africa is crucial.

    • Although under the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) avenues for data transfer exist, the ones feasible for transcontinental data exchange for biobank research rely on EU enforcement which in essence means limited oversight possibilities and, consequently, considerable risks to the EU data subject’s privacy.

    • To ensure effective data protection for data subjects in biobanking, raising the data protection bar in data recipient countries is crucial. Although Kenya, Nigeria, South Africa, and Uganda have taken considerable steps towards developing data protection frameworks, only that of South Africa and Nigeria’s Protection of Personal Information Bill seem to be such to meet the protection level set out by the GDPR. The legislative initiatives in Kenya and Uganda require revisions to ensure that protection of privacy is not undermined when data are being sent to these countries.

    • Currently, considerable responsibility is placed in the hands of the legislatures in the countries of concern—and notably in Kenya, and Uganda—to set foundations for ending research and research integrity-harming practices. In Nigeria, these foundations are defined in the Protection of Personal Information Bill, but not adopted yet. South Africa, however, has taken a big step towards building routes for genuine biobank capacity-building in the country and collaboration in that regard.

  • 17.
    Warnling-Nerep, Wiweka
    et al.
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Law, Department of Law.
    Lagerqvist Veloz Roca, Annika
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Law, Department of Law.
    Reichel, Jane
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Law, Department of Law.
    Statsrättens grunder, 2 uppl2007Chapter in book (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.))
  • 18. Weaver, Russell L.
    et al.
    Reichel, Jane
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Law, Department of Law.
    Introduction2019In: Comparative Perspectives on Privacy in an Internet Era / [ed] Russell L. Weaver, Jane Reichel, Steven I. Friedland, Durham, North Carolina: Carolina Academic Press, 2019, p. xiii-xviiiChapter in book (Other academic)
1 - 18 of 18
CiteExportLink to result list
Permanent link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf