Change search
Refine search result
1 - 24 of 24
CiteExportLink to result list
Permanent link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Rows per page
  • 5
  • 10
  • 20
  • 50
  • 100
  • 250
Sort
  • Standard (Relevance)
  • Author A-Ö
  • Author Ö-A
  • Title A-Ö
  • Title Ö-A
  • Publication type A-Ö
  • Publication type Ö-A
  • Issued (Oldest first)
  • Issued (Newest first)
  • Created (Oldest first)
  • Created (Newest first)
  • Last updated (Oldest first)
  • Last updated (Newest first)
  • Disputation date (earliest first)
  • Disputation date (latest first)
  • Standard (Relevance)
  • Author A-Ö
  • Author Ö-A
  • Title A-Ö
  • Title Ö-A
  • Publication type A-Ö
  • Publication type Ö-A
  • Issued (Oldest first)
  • Issued (Newest first)
  • Created (Oldest first)
  • Created (Newest first)
  • Last updated (Oldest first)
  • Last updated (Newest first)
  • Disputation date (earliest first)
  • Disputation date (latest first)
Select
The maximal number of hits you can export is 250. When you want to export more records please use the Create feeds function.
  • 1.
    Arnberg, Klara
    et al.
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Economic History.
    Sundevall, Fia
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Economic History.
    Tjeder, David
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Humanities, Department of History.
    Folkhem och uppror: könspolitiska nyckeltexter 1930–20102012In: Könspolitiska nyckeltexter II: Från befolkningskris till talibantal, 1930-2002 / [ed] Arnberg, Klara; Sundevall, Fia & Tjeder, David, Göteborg: Makadam Förlag, 2012, p. 12-25Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 2.
    Arnberg, Klara
    et al.
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Economic History.
    Sundevall, FiaStockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Economic History.Tjeder, DavidStockholm University, Faculty of Humanities, Department of History.
    Könspolitiska nyckeltexter: Del 1, Från äktenskapskritik till sexualupplysning, 1839-19302012Collection (editor) (Other academic)
  • 3.
    Arnberg, Klara
    et al.
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Economic History.
    Sundevall, FiaStockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Economic History.Tjeder, DavidStockholm University, Faculty of Humanities, Department of History.
    Könspolitiska nyckeltexter: Del 2, Från befolkningskris till talibantal 1930-20022012Collection (editor) (Other academic)
  • 4.
    Arnberg, Klara
    et al.
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Economic History.
    Sundevall, Fia
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Economic History.
    Tjeder, David
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Humanities, Department of History.
    Äktenskapsdebatt och rösträttskamp: könspolitiska nyckeltexter 1830–19302012In: Könspolitiska nyckeltexter I: Från äktenskapskritik till sexualupplysning, 1839-1930 / [ed] Arnberg, Klara; Sundevall, Fia & Tjeder, David, Göteborg: Makadam Förlag, 2012, p. 12-26Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 5.
    Tjeder, David
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Humanities, Department of History.
    1800-talets borgerliga erfarenheter2006In: Historisk Tidskrift (S), ISSN 0345-469X, Vol. 126, no 3, p. 501-508Article, review/survey (Other academic)
  • 6.
    Tjeder, David
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Humanities, Department of History.
    Borgarklassens diskreta charm: [Recension av] Den goda människan från Göteborg : genus och fattigvårdspolitik i det borgerliga samhällets framväxt / Birgitta Jordansson. Lund : Arkiv, 1998 304 s.1999In: Häften för Kritiska Studier, ISSN 0345-4789, Vol. 32, no 1, p. 73-78Article, book review (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.))
  • 7.
    Tjeder, David
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Humanities, Department of History.
    Borgerlighetens sköra manlighet2006In: Män i Norden: manlighet och modernitet 1840–1940 / [ed] Jørgen Lorentzen, Claes Ekenstam, Möklinta: Gidlunds förlag, 2006, p. 48-76Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 8.
    Tjeder, David
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Humanities, Department of History.
    Det manliggörande tvivlet2008In: Kristen manlighet: ideal och verklighet 1830–1940 / [ed] Yvonne Maria Werner, Lund: Nordic Academic Press, 2008, p. 93-118Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 9.
    Tjeder, David
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Humanities, Department of History.
    Don Juans problematiska manlighet: Förföraren och sedlighetsdebatten i svenskt 1800-tal2000In: Historisk Tidskrift (S), ISSN 0345-469X, Vol. 120, p. 343-369Article in journal (Refereed)
  • 10.
    Tjeder, David
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Humanities, Department of History.
    Framgång med förpliktelser: bildningsborgerskapet och den kulturbärande företagaren2007In: Företagaren som kulturbärare: perspektiv på företagarkultur 1800–2000 / [ed] Tomas Nilson, Martin Åberg, Lund: Studentlitteratur, 2007, p. 39-64Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 11.
    Tjeder, David
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Humanities, Department of History.
    Genussystemet och den vite mannens börda1999In: Häften för Kritiska Studier, ISSN 0345-4789, Vol. 32, no 3, p. 91-94Article in journal (Other academic)
  • 12.
    Tjeder, David
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Humanities, Department of History.
    Konsten att blifva herre öfver hvarje lidelse: den ständigt hotade manligheten1999In: Manligt och omanligt i ett historiskt perspektiv / [ed] Anne Marie Berggren, Stockholm: Forskningsrådsnämnden (FRN) , 1999, p. 177-196Chapter in book (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.))
  • 13.
    Tjeder, David
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Humanities, Department of History.
    L’adolescense et les inquiétudes à-propos de la masculinité au XIXe siècle2003In: Lorsque l’enfant grandit: entre dépendance et autonomie / [ed] Jean-Pierre Bardet, Jean-Noël Luc, Isabelle Robin-Romero, Catherine Rollet, Paris: Presses d l'Université de Paris-Sorbonne , 2003, p. 291-302Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 14.
    Tjeder, David
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Humanities, Department of History.
    Maskulinum som problem: genusforskningen om män2004In: Genushistoria: en historiografisk exposé / [ed] Christina Carlsson Wetterberg, Anna Jansdotter, Lund: Studentlitteratur, 2004, p. 239-253Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 15.
    Tjeder, David
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Humanities, Department of History.
    Maskulinum som problem: Genusforskningen om män2002In: Historisk Tidskrift (S), ISSN 0345-469X, Vol. 122, p. 481-493Article, review/survey (Other academic)
  • 16.
    Tjeder, David
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Humanities, Department of History.
    One hundred years of uncertainty: changing conceptions of the ideal man, 1800–19002000In: Only human: studies in the history of conceptions of man / [ed] Arne Jarrick, Stockholm: Almquist & Wicksell International , 2000, p. 153-190Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 17.
    Tjeder, David
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Humanities, Department of History.
    Passionerna som hotade manligheten och det borgerliga fundamentet2004In: Tvärsnitt, ISSN 0348-7997, Vol. 26, no 1, p. 14-25Article in journal (Other academic)
    Abstract [sv]

    Enligt 1800-talets borgerliga mansideal skulle mannen vara karaktärsfast och ha styrka att motstå och kontrollera sina inre passioner. Vrede, vällust, dryckenskap och spel uppfattades som konstanta hotbilder, vilka kunde få honom på fall och förvandla den perfekte fadern från dygdig make och familjeförsörjare till lastbar drinkare och misslyckad man.

  • 18.
    Tjeder, David
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Humanities, Department of History.
    [Recension av] Anders Ekström, Dödens exempel2000In: Historisk Tidskrift (S), ISSN 0345-469X, Vol. 121, p. 787-788Article, book review (Other academic)
  • 19.
    Tjeder, David
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Humanities, Department of History.
    Smirthwaite anar antifeministiska ugglor i alla mossar!2005In: Genus, ISSN 1403-8943, no 4, p. 30-31Article in journal (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.))
  • 20.
    Tjeder, David
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Humanities, Department of History.
    The power of character: Middle-class masculinities, 1800–19002003Doctoral thesis, monograph (Other academic)
    Abstract [en]

    This is a study of continuity and change in middle-class conceptions of ideal manhood. My theoretical cues are the notions of the male as an unproblematised and genderless norm, masculinity as homosocial, and George L. Mosse’s use of countertypes.

    Notions of passions, youth, and character were important throughout the century. If young men could learn to master the dangerous passions especially in the precarious period of youth, they would develop character. If men instead gave in to the passions, they would fall and become countertypes. Meanwhile, young men lived according to another notion, that young men should have their fling.

    The meaning of manhood also changed over time. In the decades around 1800, manhood meant to lead a life which would be beneficial to society as a whole. Another ideal, that of the man of the world, was founded on urbane manners as a tactic to further one’s career. By mid-century, the ideal of the self-made man came to the fore. The homosocial world of business was now seen as a good way to mould manly characters. In the last decades of the century, moralists criticized the sexual double standard and male sexuality. To remain chaste until marriage became a central mark of manhood. Autobiographers, however, reveal that to many men, Don Juan was a hero rather than a villain.

    The notion that men were genderless and that masculinity was not a subject of discussion cannot be sustained. Masculinity was indeed the subject of intense discussions. Meanwhile, neither moralists nor autobiographers shed critical light on married, adult men. The problem was how young men should best be guided into an adult position of legitimate power; that position of power in itself was not problematised. While most masculinities were homosocial, this was not exclusively so. Countertypes were more complex than what Mosse allows for. Men who had taken ideal manhood too far could be countertypes, and at times men endorsed ideals which meant unmanliness to moralists.

     

  • 21.
    Tjeder, David
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Humanities, Department of History.
    Ulf Lundell, en kärlekshistoria2006In: Bang, ISSN 1102-4593, no 3, p. 47-49Article in journal (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.))
  • 22.
    Tjeder, David
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Humanities, Department of History.
    What the gendering of men has engendered: [Recension av] Bo Nilsson. Maskulinitet: Representation, ideologi och retorik (Masculinity, Ideology and Rhetorics). 168 (Umeå : Boréa, 1999).[Recension av] Jens Ljunggren. Kroppens bildning: Linggymnastikens manlighetsprojekt 1790– 1914. (The Fostering of the Human Body). (Stockholm/Stehag: Symposon, 1999).2000In: NORA: Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, ISSN 0803-8740, E-ISSN 1502-394X, Vol. 8, no 3, p. 168-172Article, book review (Other academic)
  • 23.
    Tjeder, David
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Humanities, Department of History.
    When character became capital: The advent of the self-made man in Sweden, 1850–19002003In: Men and Masculinities, ISSN 1097-184X, E-ISSN 1552-6828, Vol. 5, no 1, p. 53-79Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    This article argues that the American ideal of the self-made man came to be an important meaning of manhood in the Swedish middle class after 1850. It discusses the ideal of self-making and its relation both to earlier masculinities and briefly to other masculine ideals of the late nineteenth century. The purpose is to showboth what the newideal of the self-making man meant and that the ideal was never completely hegemonic. Even while men’s striving for riches became a mark of manhood, other, even contrary meanings of manhood existed.

  • 24.
    Tjeder, David
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Humanities, Department of History.
    Är könet en konstruktion?: Ett inlägg i den aktuella debatten2000In: Lambda Nordica: Tidskrift om homosexualitet, ISSN 1100-2573, Vol. 6, no 1, p. 6-25Article in journal (Other academic)
    Abstract [en]

    Abstract: This article examines an argument in much current feminist theorizing of gender, that the old distinction between (biological) sex and (cultural) gender can no longer be sustained. Much of this theorizing is taken from Judith Butler's influential work "Gender Trouble" (1990). It would seem that Butler's critique of the sex/gender distinction has already turned into a given truth in Sweden. Rather than examining Butler, the article focusses instead on articles by Swedish scholars. It turns out that the scholars who argue that sex cannot be separated from gender have redefined biological sex as what was earlier perceived as gender. The concept "sex" is used in a whole range of different ways: for example to describe people's gendered expectations and demands on individuals of either sex; it is used as the principle which leads us to think of all humans as either male or female; or it seen as a discourse, a régime, as in Butler's discussion of the heterosexual matrix. However, all scholars discussed still take biological dimorphism in the human species for granted. That is, biological sex is first redefined as what was earlier described with the concept of gender (with some new arguments, certainly, the new and important discussion about heterosexuality not least), even while the existence of biological men and women is taken for granted. The new critique is thus still based on the fact that biological men and women exist. It seems, then, that the newer uses of the concept "sex" are not comparable to earlier uses, <em>even while that earlier biological use is taken for granted in the new critique.</em> This can be seen for example when Sara Danius, after a fierce critique of the sex/gender distinction, admits to the existence of a "banal" and "pragmatic" sex. That "sex", I would argue, was just the sex implied in the sex/gender distinction. The article should not be read as an outright defence of the distinction between sex and gender, but rather as an analysis of the arguments that have been brought forward to critique that distinction. As I hope to have shown, these arguments have not been convincing.

1 - 24 of 24
CiteExportLink to result list
Permanent link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf