Endre søk
Begrens søket
1 - 10 of 10
RefereraExporteraLink til resultatlisten
Permanent link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Treff pr side
  • 5
  • 10
  • 20
  • 50
  • 100
  • 250
Sortering
  • Standard (Relevans)
  • Forfatter A-Ø
  • Forfatter Ø-A
  • Tittel A-Ø
  • Tittel Ø-A
  • Type publikasjon A-Ø
  • Type publikasjon Ø-A
  • Eldste først
  • Nyeste først
  • Skapad (Eldste først)
  • Skapad (Nyeste først)
  • Senast uppdaterad (Eldste først)
  • Senast uppdaterad (Nyeste først)
  • Disputationsdatum (tidligste først)
  • Disputationsdatum (siste først)
  • Standard (Relevans)
  • Forfatter A-Ø
  • Forfatter Ø-A
  • Tittel A-Ø
  • Tittel Ø-A
  • Type publikasjon A-Ø
  • Type publikasjon Ø-A
  • Eldste først
  • Nyeste først
  • Skapad (Eldste først)
  • Skapad (Nyeste først)
  • Senast uppdaterad (Eldste først)
  • Senast uppdaterad (Nyeste først)
  • Disputationsdatum (tidligste først)
  • Disputationsdatum (siste først)
Merk
Maxantalet träffar du kan exportera från sökgränssnittet är 250. Vid större uttag använd dig av utsökningar.
  • 1.
    Bunge, A. Charlotte
    et al.
    Stockholms universitet, Naturvetenskapliga fakulteten, Stockholm Resilience Centre.
    Wood, Amanda
    Stockholms universitet, Naturvetenskapliga fakulteten, Stockholm Resilience Centre.
    Halloran, Afton
    Gordon, Line
    Stockholms universitet, Naturvetenskapliga fakulteten, Stockholm Resilience Centre.
    A systematic scoping review of the sustainability of vertical farming, plant-based alternatives, food delivery services and blockchain in food systems2022Inngår i: Nature Food, E-ISSN 2662-1355, Vol. 3, s. 933-941Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert)
    Abstract [en]

    Food system technologies (FSTs) are being developed to accelerate the transformation towards sustainable food systems. Here we conducted a systematic scoping review that accounts for multiple dimensions of sustainability to describe the extent, range and nature of peer-reviewed literature that assesses the sustainability performance of four FSTs: plant-based alternatives, vertical farming, food deliveries and blockchain technology. Included literature had a dominant focus on environmental sustainability and less on public health and socio-economic sustainability. Gaps in the literature include empirical assessments on the sustainability of blockchain technology, plant-based seafood alternatives, public health consequences of food deliveries and socio-economic consequences of vertical farming. The development of a holistic sustainability assessment framework that demonstrates the impact of deploying FSTs is needed to guide investments in and the development of sustainable food innovation. Gaps in the literature include empirical sustainability assessments of blockchain technology and plant-based seafood alternatives, public health consequences of food deliveries and socio-economic consequences of vertical farming.

  • 2. Gaupp, F.
    et al.
    Ruggeri Laderchi, C.
    Lotze-Campen, H.
    DeClerck, Fabrice
    Stockholms universitet, Naturvetenskapliga fakulteten, Stockholm Resilience Centre. EAT, Norway.
    Bodirsky, B. L.
    Lowder, S.
    Popp, A.
    Kanbur, R.
    Edenhofer, O.
    Nugent, R.
    Fanzo, J.
    Dietz, S.
    Nordhagen, S.
    Fan, S.
    Food system development pathways for healthy, nature-positive and inclusive food systems2021Inngår i: Nature Food, E-ISSN 2662-1355, Vol. 2, nr 12, s. 928-934Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert)
    Abstract [en]

    Sustainable food systems require the integration of and alignment between recommendations for food and land use practices, as well as an understanding of the political economy context and identification of entry points for change. We propose a food systems transformation framework that takes these elements into account and links long-term goals with short-term measures and policies, ultimately guiding the decomposition of transformation pathways into concrete steps. Taking the transition to healthier and more sustainable diets as an example, we underscore the centrality of social inclusion to the food systems transformation debate. Addressing trade-offs between the environment, health and inclusion in the quest for sustainable food systems requires integrated and coherent policies. This Perspective proposes a food systems transformation framework that brings these elements together and enables the design of concrete development pathways for food sustainability.

  • 3. Herzon, Irina
    et al.
    Mazac, Rachel
    Stockholms universitet, Naturvetenskapliga fakulteten, Stockholm Resilience Centre. University of Helsinki, Finland.
    Erkkola, Maijaliisa
    Garnett, Tara
    Hansson, Helena
    Kaljonen, Minna
    Kortetmäki, Teea
    Lonkila, Annika
    Jonell, Malin
    Stockholms universitet, Naturvetenskapliga fakulteten, Stockholm Resilience Centre. Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, Sweden.
    Niva, Mari
    Pajari, Anne-Maria
    Tribaldos, Theresa
    Toivonen, Marjaana
    Tuomisto, Hanna L.
    Koppelmäki, Kari
    Röös, Elin
    A rebalanced discussion of the roles of livestock in society2023Inngår i: Nature Food, E-ISSN 2662-1355, Vol. 4, nr 11, s. 926-927Artikkel i tidsskrift (Annet vitenskapelig)
  • 4. Ingram, John
    et al.
    Bellotti, William
    Brklacich, Mike
    Achterbosch, Thom
    Balázs, Bálint
    Banse, Martin
    Fielke, Simon
    Gordon, Line
    Stockholms universitet, Naturvetenskapliga fakulteten, Stockholm Resilience Centre.
    Hasnain, Saher
    Herman, Lieve
    Kanter, Rebecca
    Kaye-Blake, William
    Mounsey, Jerome
    Pihlanto, Anne
    Quinlan, Allyson
    Six, Johan
    Stotten, Rike
    Tomich, Thomas
    Tóth, Attila
    Yacamán, Carolina
    Zurek, Monika
    Further concepts and approaches for enhancing food system resilience2023Inngår i: Nature Food, E-ISSN 2662-1355, Vol. 4, nr 6, s. 440-441Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert)
    Abstract [en]

    The cornerstones to enhance food system resilience can be considered as three fundamental concepts, the ‘3Rs’1: robustness, based on the capacity of the food system actors to adapt their activities to resist disruptions to desired food system outcomes; recovery, based on the ability of food system actors to adapt their activities so as to be able to return to pre-existing food system outcomes following disruption; and reorientation, based on the ability of food system actors to adapt their activities based on accepting alternative food system outcomes as a strategy before or after disruption. The 3Rs are not mutually exclusive or hierarchical. Each is dynamic, complex and subject to unpredictable uncertainties, requiring innovations in institutions, governance mechanisms and other systems of accountability, as well as changes in culture, individual behaviour and technology. An appropriate balance is needed across the 3Rs, rather than advocating for singular solutions. While resilience strategies based on robustness and recovery may be more appropriate in the short term but not sustainable, reorientation is arguably a longer-term approach, suggesting practitioners need to situate shorter-term ‘status quo’ efforts within a longer-term, reorientated vision.

  • 5.
    Resare Sahlin, Kajsa
    et al.
    Stockholms universitet, Naturvetenskapliga fakulteten, Stockholm Resilience Centre.
    Trewern, Joanna
    A systematic review of the definitions and interpretations in scientific literature of 'less but better' meat in high-income settings2022Inngår i: Nature Food, E-ISSN 2662-1355, Vol. 3, nr 6, s. 454-460Artikkel, forskningsoversikt (Fagfellevurdert)
    Abstract [en]

    ‘Less but better’ is a pragmatic approach to tackling the sustainability challenges of meat consumption and production. Definitions of ‘less’ and ‘better’ lack clarity. Here we explore interpretations of these concepts, finding increasing use of ‘less but better’ in the literature from Western, high-income settings. Despite discrepancies among interpretations of ‘less’ meat, existing quantifications indicate that significant reduction is needed to achieve desirable food system outcomes. Interpretations of ‘better’ meat incorporate the delivery of environmental sustainability, improved animal welfare and better health or nutrition, but lack clear principles and omit many sustainability themes. Practices and outcomes are seldom linked, and diverging narratives on interactions between ‘less’ and ‘better’ exist. A shared vision of livestock systems with improved sustainability across multiple indicators is needed to establish principles for ‘less but better’ in order for decision-making to deliver desired outcomes.

  • 6. Sandström, Vilma
    et al.
    Chrysafi, Anna
    Lamminen, Marjukka
    Troell, Max
    Stockholms universitet, Naturvetenskapliga fakulteten, Stockholm Resilience Centre. Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, Sweden.
    Jalava, Mika
    Piipponen, Johannes
    Siebert, Stefan
    van Hal, Ollie
    Virkki, Vili
    Kummu, Matti
    Food system by-products upcycled in livestock and aquaculture feeds can increase global food supply2022Inngår i: Nature Food, E-ISSN 2662-1355, Vol. 3, nr 9, s. 729-740Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert)
    Abstract [en]

    Many livestock and aquaculture feeds compete for resources with food production. Increasing the use of food system by-products and residues as feed could reduce this competition. We gathered data on global food system material flows for crop, livestock and aquaculture production, focusing on feed use and the availability of by-products and residues. We then analysed the potential of replacing food-competing feedstuff—here cereals, whole fish, vegetable oils and pulses that account for 15% of total feed use—with food system by-products and residues. Considering the nutritional requirements of food-producing animals, including farmed aquatic species, this replacement could increase the current global food supply by up to 13% (10–16%) in terms of kcal and 15% (12–19%) in terms of protein content. Increasing the use of food system by-products as feed has considerable potential, particularly when combined with other measures, in the much-needed transition towards circular food systems.

  • 7. Shepon, Alon
    et al.
    Gephart, Jessica A.
    Henriksson, Patrik John Gustav
    Stockholms universitet, Naturvetenskapliga fakulteten, Stockholm Resilience Centre. WorldFish, Malaysia; The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, Sweden.
    Jones, Robert
    Murshed-e-Jahan, Khondker
    Eshel, Gidon
    Golden, Christopher D.
    Reorientation of aquaculture production systems can reduce environmental impacts and improve nutrition security in Bangladesh2020Inngår i: Nature Food, E-ISSN 2662-1355, Vol. 1, nr 10, s. 640-647Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert)
    Abstract [en]

    Aquatic foods are a critical source of human nutrition in many developing countries. As a result, declines in wild-caught fish landings threaten nutritionally vulnerable populations. Aquaculture presents an opportunity to meet local demand, but it also places pressure on natural resource inputs and causes a range of environmental impacts. Here, we examine whether current aquaculture systems in Bangladesh can be reoriented to address prevailing nutritional deficiencies while minimizing these environmental impacts. Current fish farming practices, even when optimized, cannot fully supply the same essential micronutrient densities of zinc, iron and calcium as wild-caught fish. However, when the proportion of highly nutrient-dense small indigenous fish species (SIS) was increased to at least 30% of the total output in any of the 14 aquaculture production systems analysed, these systems were able to meet or surpass the nutrient densities of average wild-capture fisheries. Extensive aquaculture systems that co-produce fish and rice had the lowest environmental burdens in six out of seven metrics examined when the composition of all aquaculture systems was modified to include 50% SIS. Nutrition-sensitive aquaculture that provides greater human health benefits and minimizes environmental impacts is a key societal challenge that requires targeted interventions and supportive policies. Aquaculture production systems in Bangladesh were configured to optimize the supply of micronutrients while minimizing environmental impacts. Increased production of small indigenous species enabled nutrient densities of farmed fish to match those of wild-caught fish, and systems that co-produce fish and rice had the lowest environmental burdens.

  • 8.
    Short, Rebecca E.
    et al.
    Stockholms universitet, Naturvetenskapliga fakulteten, Stockholm Resilience Centre.
    Gelcich, Stefan
    Little, David C.
    Micheli, Fiorenza
    Allison, Edward H.
    Basurto, Xavier
    Belton, Ben
    Brugere, Cecile
    Bush, Simon R.
    Cao, Ling
    Crona, Beatrice
    Stockholms universitet, Naturvetenskapliga fakulteten, Stockholm Resilience Centre. Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, Sweden.
    Cohen, Philippa J.
    Defeo, Omar
    Edwards, Peter
    Ferguson, Caroline E.
    Franz, Nicole
    Golden, Christopher D.
    Halpern, Benjamin S.
    Hazen, Lucie
    Hicks, Christina
    Johnson, Derek
    Kaminski, Alexander M.
    Mangubhai, Sangeeta
    Naylor, Rosamond L.
    Reantaso, Melba
    Sumaila, U. Rashid
    Thilsted, Shakuntala H.
    Tigchelaar, Michelle
    Wabnitz, Colette C. C.
    Zhang, Wenbo
    Harnessing the diversity of small-scale actors is key to the future of aquatic food systems2021Inngår i: Nature Food, E-ISSN 2662-1355, Vol. 2, nr 9, s. 733-741Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert)
    Abstract [en]

    Small-scale fisheries and aquaculture (SSFA) provide livelihoods for over 100 million people and sustenance for -1 billion people, particularly in the Global South. Aquatic foods are distributed through diverse supply chains, with the potential to be highly adaptable to stresses and shocks, but face a growing range of threats and adaptive challenges. Contemporary governance assumes homogeneity in SSFA despite the diverse nature of this sector. Here we use SSFA actor profiles to capture the key dimensions and dynamism of SSFA diversity, reviewing contemporary threats and exploring opportunities for the SSFA sector. The heuristic framework can inform adaptive governance actions supporting the diversity and vital roles of SSFA in food systems, and in the health and livelihoods of nutritionally vulnerable people-supporting their viability through appropriate policies whilst fostering equitable and sustainable food systems.

  • 9. Tigchelaar, Michelle
    et al.
    Cheung, William W. L.
    Mohammed, Essam Yassin
    Phillips, Michael J.
    Payne, Hanna J.
    Selig, Elizabeth R.
    Wabnitz, Colette C. C.
    Oyinlola, Muhammed A.
    Frölicher, Thomas L.
    Gephart, Jessica A.
    Golden, Christopher D.
    Allison, Edward H.
    Bennett, Abigail
    Cao, Ling
    Fanzo, Jessica
    Halpern, Benjamin S.
    Lam, Vicky W. Y.
    Micheli, Fiorenza
    Naylor, Rosamond L.
    Sumaila, U. Rashid
    Tagliabue, Alessandro
    Troell, Max
    Stockholms universitet, Naturvetenskapliga fakulteten, Stockholm Resilience Centre. The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, Sweden.
    Compound climate risks threaten aquatic food system benefits2021Inngår i: Nature Food, E-ISSN 2662-1355, Vol. 2, nr 9, s. 673-682Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert)
    Abstract [en]

    The nutritional, economic and livelihood contributions provided by aquatic food systems are threatened by climate change. Building climate resilience requires systemic interventions that reduce social vulnerabilities. Aquatic foods from marine and freshwater systems are critical to the nutrition, health, livelihoods, economies and cultures of billions of people worldwide, but climate-related hazards may compromise their ability to provide these benefits. Here, we estimate national-level aquatic food system climate risk using an integrative food systems approach that connects climate hazards impacting marine and freshwater capture fisheries and aquaculture to their contributions to sustainable food system outcomes. We show that without mitigation, climate hazards pose high risks to nutritional, social, economic and environmental outcomes worldwide-especially for wild-capture fisheries in Africa, South and Southeast Asia, and Small Island Developing States. For countries projected to experience compound climate risks, reducing societal vulnerabilities can lower climate risk by margins similar to meeting Paris Agreement mitigation targets. System-level interventions addressing dimensions such as governance, gender equity and poverty are needed to enhance aquatic and terrestrial food system resilience and provide investments with large co-benefits towards meeting the Sustainable Development Goals.

  • 10.
    Wood, Amanda
    et al.
    Stockholms universitet, Naturvetenskapliga fakulteten, Stockholm Resilience Centre.
    Queiroz, Cibele
    Stockholms universitet, Naturvetenskapliga fakulteten, Stockholm Resilience Centre. Global Resilience Partnership, Sweden.
    Deutsch, Lisa
    Stockholms universitet, Naturvetenskapliga fakulteten, Stockholm Resilience Centre. Stockholms universitet, Humanistiska fakulteten, Romanska och klassiska institutionen, Nordiska Latinamerikainstitutet.
    González-Mon, Blanca
    Stockholms universitet, Naturvetenskapliga fakulteten, Stockholm Resilience Centre.
    Jonell, Malin
    Stockholms universitet, Naturvetenskapliga fakulteten, Stockholm Resilience Centre. The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, Sweden.
    Pereira, Laura
    Stockholms universitet, Naturvetenskapliga fakulteten, Stockholm Resilience Centre. University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa.
    Sinare, Hanna
    Stockholms universitet, Naturvetenskapliga fakulteten, Stockholm Resilience Centre.
    Svedin, Uno
    Stockholms universitet, Naturvetenskapliga fakulteten, Stockholm Resilience Centre.
    Wassénius, Emmy
    Stockholms universitet, Naturvetenskapliga fakulteten, Stockholm Resilience Centre. The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, Sweden.
    Reframing the local–global food systems debate through a resilience lens2023Inngår i: Nature Food, E-ISSN 2662-1355, Vol. 4, nr 1, s. 22-29Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert)
    Abstract [en]

    Despite the growing knowledge that food system solutions should account for interactions and drivers across scales, broader societal debate on how to solve food system challenges is often focused on two dichotomous perspectives and associated solutions: either more localized food systems or greater global coordination of food systems. The debate has found problematic expressions in contemporary challenges, prompting us to revisit the role that resilience thinking can play when faced with complex crises that increase uncertainty. Here we identify four ‘aching points’ facing food systems that are central points of tension in the local–global debate. We apply the seven principles of resilience to these aching points to reframe the solution space to one that embeds resilience into food systems’ management and governance at all scales, supporting transformative change towards sustainable food systems.

1 - 10 of 10
RefereraExporteraLink til resultatlisten
Permanent link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf