System disruptions
There are recurring service disruptions on some of the search portals due to high traffic. We are working to resolve the issue, you may temporarily encounter an error message.
Change search
Link to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Blomdahl, Mikael, DocentORCID iD iconorcid.org/0009-0000-0237-2455
Publications (3 of 3) Show all publications
Blomdahl, M. (2021). The Short Stint of a Coordinator: National Security Adviser H. R. McMaster in the Trump Administration. European Journal of American Studies, 16(2)
Open this publication in new window or tab >>The Short Stint of a Coordinator: National Security Adviser H. R. McMaster in the Trump Administration
2021 (English)In: European Journal of American Studies, E-ISSN 1991-9336, Vol. 16, no 2Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

This article examines the role of former National Security Adviser H. R. McMaster in the Trump administration. The article discusses four major roles performed by the APNSA - administrator, coordinator, counselor, agent - and asserts that McMaster served as a coordinator that failed to achieve a close relationship with the president. Probing the role and performance of President Trump's second APNSA underscores both the significance of a partly influential APNSA and apparent constraints in relation to what a president with a unconventional management style allowed him to do. Examining the importance of presidential management style on the role, power and influence of the APNSA will further our understanding of how, when, and under what conditions national security-level leaders make decisions.

Keywords
National security adviser, H.M. McMaster, The Trump administration, the inter-agency process, Afghanistan, Iran
National Category
Political Science
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:su:diva-196529 (URN)10.4000/ejas.17099 (DOI)000674170600007 ()
Available from: 2021-09-07 Created: 2021-09-07 Last updated: 2025-05-21Bibliographically approved
Blomdahl, M. (2019). Changing the Conversation in Washington? An Illustrative Case Study of President Trump's Air Strikes on Syria, 2017. Diplomacy & Statecraft, 30(3), 536-555
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Changing the Conversation in Washington? An Illustrative Case Study of President Trump's Air Strikes on Syria, 2017
2019 (English)In: Diplomacy & Statecraft, ISSN 0959-2296, E-ISSN 1557-301X, Vol. 30, no 3, p. 536-555Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

This analysis uses case study methodology to further the understanding of the diversionary theory of war in specific cases. It employs a model consisting of five propositions that build upon existing qualitative research on diversionary war theory. The synthesised framework examines one possible case of American diversionary military actions: President Donald Trump ' s decision to launch missile strikes against Syrian airfields on 7 April 2017. The study tests the descriptive accuracy and further develops the diversionary theory of war, in essence, generally suggesting that empirical support for the diversionary logic in this case is mixed.

National Category
Political Science
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:su:diva-173071 (URN)10.1080/09592296.2019.1641924 (DOI)000481821600006 ()
Available from: 2019-09-18 Created: 2019-09-18 Last updated: 2025-05-21Bibliographically approved
Blomdahl, M. (2018). Interacting Interests: Explaining President Obama ' s Libyan Decision. European Journal of American Studies, 13(2)
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Interacting Interests: Explaining President Obama ' s Libyan Decision
2018 (English)In: European Journal of American Studies, E-ISSN 1991-9336, Vol. 13, no 2Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

This article investigates why President Obama in 2011 ordered US air and naval forces to launch Operation Odyssey Dawn in Libya. The president's decision was the result of a combination of factors, including feelings of altruism, the legal basis for the operation, international support, domestic political constraints and the possibility to limit U.S. participation. The case study attempt to trace the process by which Obama came to the decision to use force in Libya by relying on a multitude of different sources, such as government reports, speeches and remarks, parliamentary records, media coverage, secondary sources.

Keywords
Operation Odyssey Dawn, the United States, foreign policy decision-making, humanitarian intervention, domestic politics
National Category
Political Science
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:su:diva-159156 (URN)10.4000/ejas.13224 (DOI)000439161900015 ()
Available from: 2018-08-28 Created: 2018-08-28 Last updated: 2025-05-21Bibliographically approved
Organisations
Identifiers
ORCID iD: ORCID iD iconorcid.org/0009-0000-0237-2455

Search in DiVA

Show all publications