Open this publication in new window or tab >>2024 (Swedish)Report (Other academic)
Abstract [sv]
I rapporten Kultursamarbeten och nordisk bidragsgivning studeras fördelning av de två stora kulturstöden hos Nordisk kulturfond och Nordisk kulturkontakt – ”Projektstöd till tvärgående samarbeten” respektive ”Kultur- och konstprogrammet”. Rapporten sammanställer en analys av samarbeten inom konst och kultur, och hur den nordiska bidragsgivningen möjliggör för gemensamma projekt. Fokus läggs på utformning av tvärgående samarbeten mellan kulturskapare och genomförande av projekt. En viktig utgångspunkt för studerad bidragsgivning är att den ska bidra till utbyten mellan de nordiska länderna och skapa nordiskt mervärde. Baserat på intervjuer med bidragsmottagare framkommer erfarenheter av hur det är att söka kulturstöd från Nordisk kulturfond och Nordisk kulturkontakt samt bygga upp nätverk.
En återkommande problematik inom nordiskt samarbete kretsar kring geografiska, miljömässiga och ekonomiska hinder som påverkar projekten från planering till genomförande. Geografiska avstånd skapar ojämlika förutsättningar för samarbete, där centrala områden gynnas av goda kommunikationer och stora kulturbudgetar, medan perifera områden står inför svårigheter att inkluderas på grund av bristande resurser. Samtidigt utgör de nordiska kulturstöden ett viktigt komplement till den nationella bidragsgivningen, inte minst för de mindre länderna som på så sätt får möjlighet att skala upp projekt och därmed får del av en större publik och arbetsmarknad.
Rapporten är framtagen av Kulturanalys Norden. Kulturanalys Norden är ett nordiskt kunskapscentrum för kulturpolitik som etablerats på uppdrag av Nordiska ministerrådet.
Rapporten är skriven på svenska med en sammanfattning på engelska.
Abstract [en]
This study constitutes an in-depth analysis of cultural collaborations and focuseson funding from the Nordic Culture Fund and Nordic Culture Point. The in-depthanalysis aims to examine the conditions for Nordic cooperation and exchanges inthe cultural sector. The report presents systematic knowledge about the nature ofNordic cultural cooperation based on funding. The study is based on interviews withgrant recipients and representatives of the joint Nordic cultural institutions NordicCulture Fund and Nordic Culture Point. More specifically, the following question isexamined: What obstacles and opportunities can be identified for Nordic culturalcooperation and exchange in the cultural sector, focusing on funding from theNordic Culture Fund and Nordic Culture Point?
A recurring issue in Nordic cooperation revolves around geographical, ecological,and economic barriers that affect projects from planning to implementation.Geographical distances create unequal conditions for cooperation, where centralareas benefit from good communications and large cultural budgets, whileperipheral areas face difficulties in inclusion due to a lack of resources. Travel, inparticular, appears to be costly and unsustainable, affecting the possibility ofcooperation and the need for funds.
Managing projects with participants from several different countries appears to bea challenge, especially for smaller organisations and unestablished actors.Nevertheless, many projects involve more than three Nordic countries. Therelationship with "the Nordic Region" varies between projects, where Nordicrelevance may be a starting point or a consequence of available funding. Differentart forms have different conditions for Nordic cooperation, with alreadyestablished networks and collaborations making some art forms more likely toapply for Nordic funding.
Difficulties arise for unestablished cultural practitioners, both in the applicationprocess and regarding concerns about reporting. Moreover, budgeting becomescomplex with different currencies and tax rules between countries. In addition, insome projects it is perceived as difficult to pay reasonable salaries to participants.The short lifespan of projects is also sometimes seen as a problem.During the covid-19-pandemic, planned projects were disrupted, but the flexibilityof donors was highlighted as positive. Physical meetings were emphasized asimportant for cultural creation, while awareness of the environmental impact oftravel within projects increased.
Despite the challenges, the participants express predominantly positive experiencesof Nordic support, but areas of development are identified to create economically,environmentally, socially and creatively sustainable projects.In summary, the following areas for further discussion and developmental work areproposed:
Art forms' connection to Nordic cooperation: How can it become easier forthose art forms that are not usually involved in Nordic cooperation to applyfor and benefit from grants?
Established and unestablished cultural practitioners: What measures can betaken to reduce the gap between established and unestablished culturalpractitioners' opportunities to apply for and receive Nordic grant funding?
Centre and periphery in Nordic cooperation: How can the differencesbetween central and peripheral areas be bridged to increase theopportunities for peripheral countries and areas to participate in Nordiccooperation and apply for grants?
Accessibility of culture in the Nordic region: How can similar conditions becreated for culture to be accessible in different places in the Nordic region,especially with regard to uniform pricing for the performance andpresentation of works?
Activities for Nordic information: There are needs for continuous informationactivities to provide information on various laws and tax rules in connectionwith the budgeting and payment of Nordic grant funds.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Nordiska ministerrådet, 2024. p. 58
Series
Nord 2024, ISSN 0903-7004 ; 014
Keywords
Arbetsliv, Gränshinder, Kultur, Hållbar utveckling, Nordliga dimensionen, Konst
National Category
Other Social Sciences not elsewhere specified Other Humanities not elsewhere specified
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:su:diva-228526 (URN)10.6027/nord2024-014 (DOI)978-92-893-7849-9 (ISBN)978-92-893-7850-5 (ISBN)
2024-04-212024-04-212024-04-24Bibliographically approved