Change search
Link to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Andreassen, MathildaORCID iD iconorcid.org/0000-0002-1779-4957
Publications (2 of 2) Show all publications
Johansson, Y., Andreassen, M., Hartsch, M., Wagner, S. & Forsby, A. (2024). Attenuated neuronal differentiation caused by acrylamide is not related to oxidative stress in differentiated human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 187, Article ID 114623.
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Attenuated neuronal differentiation caused by acrylamide is not related to oxidative stress in differentiated human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells
Show others...
2024 (English)In: Food and Chemical Toxicology, ISSN 0278-6915, E-ISSN 1873-6351, Vol. 187, article id 114623Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Acrylamide (ACR) is a known neurotoxicant and developmental neurotoxicant. As a soft electrophile, ACR reacts with thiol groups in cysteine. One hypothesis of ACR induced neurotoxicity and developmental neurotoxicity (DNT) is conjugation with reduced glutathione (GSH) leading to GSH depletion, increased reactive oxygen species (ROS) production and further oxidative stress and cellular damage. In this regard, we have investigated the effect of ACR on neuronal differentiation, glutathione levels and ROS production in the human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cell model. After 9 days of differentiation and exposure, ACR significantly impaired area neurites per cell at non-cytotoxic concentrations (0.33 μM and 10 μM). Furthermore, 10 μM ACR dysregulated 9 mRNA markers important for neuronal development, 5 of them being associated with cytoskeleton organization and axonal guidance. At the non-cytotoxic concentrations that significantly attenuate neuronal differentiation, ACR did neither decrease the level of GSH or total glutathione levels, nor increased ROS production. In addition, the expression of 5 mRNA markers for cellular stress was assessed with no significant altered regulation after ACR exposure up to 320 μM. Thus, ACR-induced DNT is not due to GSH depletion and increased ROS production, neither at non-cytotoxic nor cytotoxic concentrations, in the SH-SH5Y model during differentiation.

Keywords
Acrylamide, Developmental neurotoxicity, Neurite outgrowth, Transcriptomics, Glutathione, Oxidative stress
National Category
Pharmacology and Toxicology
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:su:diva-231173 (URN)10.1016/j.fct.2024.114623 (DOI)001224591600001 ()38554842 (PubMedID)2-s2.0-85189518508 (Scopus ID)
Available from: 2024-06-25 Created: 2024-06-25 Last updated: 2024-09-04Bibliographically approved
Lindeman, B., Johansson, Y., Andreassen, M., Husøy, T., Dirven, H., Hofer, T., . . . Myhre, O. (2021). Does the food processing contaminant acrylamide cause developmental neurotoxicity? A review and identification of knowledge gaps. Reproductive Toxicology, 101, 93-114
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Does the food processing contaminant acrylamide cause developmental neurotoxicity? A review and identification of knowledge gaps
Show others...
2021 (English)In: Reproductive Toxicology, ISSN 0890-6238, E-ISSN 1873-1708, Vol. 101, p. 93-114Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

There is a worldwide concern on adverse health effects of dietary exposure to acrylamide (AA) due to its presence in commonly consumed foods. AA is formed when carbohydrate rich foods containing asparagine and reducing sugars are prepared at high temperatures and low moisture conditions. Upon oral intake, AA is rapidly absorbed and distributed to all organs. AA is a known human neurotoxicant that can reach the developing foetus via placental transfer and breast milk. Although adverse neurodevelopmental effects have been observed after prenatal AA exposure in rodents, adverse effects of AA on the developing brain has so far not been studied in humans. However, epidemiological studies indicate that gestational exposure to AA impair foetal growth and AA exposure has been associated with reduced head circumference of the neonate. Thus, there is an urgent need for further research to elucidate whether pre- and perinatal AA exposure in humans might impair neurodevelopment and adversely affect neuronal function postnatally. Here, we review the literature with emphasis on the identification of critical knowledge gaps in relation to neurodevelopmental toxicity of AA and its mode of action and we suggest research strategies to close these gaps to better protect the unborn child.

Keywords
Acrylamide, Developmental neurotoxicity, Developmental origins of health and disease, Glycidamide, Human neuronal stem cells, Neurological, Physiologically based toxicokinetic (PBTK), The Norwegian mother father and child cohort, (MoBa)
National Category
Pharmacology and Toxicology
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:su:diva-194359 (URN)10.1016/j.reprotox.2021.02.006 (DOI)000640326700001 ()33617935 (PubMedID)
Available from: 2021-06-21 Created: 2021-06-21 Last updated: 2022-03-23Bibliographically approved
Organisations
Identifiers
ORCID iD: ORCID iD iconorcid.org/0000-0002-1779-4957

Search in DiVA

Show all publications