In Sweden, the PIRLS 2021 results demonstrate an increased number of poor readers. Moreover, socioeconomic background (SES) remains a strong predictor of students´ reading ability, favoring students from high SES backgrounds, as well as whether Swedish is spoken at home or not (Mullis et al., 2023). The current study adopts the Simple View of Reading (Gough & Tunmer, 1986) as its theoretical framework. The Schoolwide Enrichment Model-Reading Framework (SEM-R) (Reis et al., 2018), was designed to strengthen reading interest and reading achievement across all reading ability levels and has been proven to increase reading comprehension and reading interest. The aim of this case study is to explore Grade 4-teachers´ experiences of the SEM-R in the Swedish middle school, and the reading ability among participating students of various reading ability levels and linguistic backgrounds before and after the intervention. Teachers (N=3) and four classes (Students N=46) were recruited from two schools located in socioeconomically different catchment areas. The classes participated in a twelve weeks SEM-R intervention employing Phase I and II in the SEM-R model. Each class received a large number of books of varying genres and levels to their respective classroom libraries to support the SEM-R implementation. Prior to the intervention, the teachers took part in a professional development session on the SEM-R. During the intervention, teachers could contact the researcher for implementation support. After the intervention, the teachers participated in a semi-structured in-depth interview, which were thematically analyzed. The students took part in pre- and post-screening tests (i.e., oral reading fluency, reading comprehension, vocabulary, spelling) to measure reading ability before and after the intervention. The main results align with previous research (e.g., Little et al., 2014; Reis et al., 2018): 1) the model promote reading growth among struggling, average, and advanced readers, 2) the SEM-R facilitates differentiated reading instruction, and 3) its structure enable a deeper assessment of students´ use of reading strategies and reading comprehension compared to traditional reading comprehension material and screening tests. Thus, the SEM-R seems suitable to employ in diverse middle school contexts in Sweden. This approach to differentiated teaching in reading in inclusive, mixed-ability classes could be of interest to Nordic researchers.
Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. E. (1986). Decoding, Reading, and Reading Disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7(1), 6–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193258600700104
Little, C. A., McCoach, D. B., & Reis, S. M. (2014). Effects of Differentiated Reading Instruction on Student Achievement in Middle School. Journal of Advanced Academics, 25(4), 384–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X14549250
Mullis, I. V. S., von Davier, M., Foy, P., Fishbein, B., Reynolds, K. A., & Wry, E. (2023). PIRLS 2021 International Results in Reading. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center. https://doi.org/10.6017/lse.tpisc.tr2103.kb5342
Reis, S. M., Little, C. A., Fogarty, E., Housand, B. C., Eckert, R. D., & Muller, L. M. (2018). Case Studies of Schoolwide Enrichment Model-Reading (SEM-R) Classroom Implementations of Differentiated and Enriched Reading Instruction. International Journal for Talent Development and Creativity, 6(1–2), 63–86.
In December 2023, the project received funding from the Nordic Mensa Fund, which supported purchase of books and screening instruments: https://nordicmensafund.org/grantsand-application/former-grantees