Open this publication in new window or tab >>Show others...
2025 (English)In: Work2025, 2025Conference paper, Oral presentation with published abstract (Other academic)
Abstract [en]
Background: The Job Demands-Resources (JD-R) model describes how job demands and resources associate with work- and health-related outcomes. Job demands refer to those aspects of work that require sustained physical and mental effort (e.g. high workload and time pressure) and that can lead to exhaustion and burnout. Job resources refer to all the aspects of work that can contribute to achieving work-related goals, reducing work demands and stimulating personal development (e.g. control and social support).
The role of personal resources is commonly examined as part of the JD-R model and has been shown to positively relate to work engagement and negatively relate to burnout. Personal resources are individual factors such as self-efficacy and boundary setting strategies that can help individuals to cope successfully with their environment. Thus, personal resources are not job resources but are aspects that can be beneficial in the associations of demands and resources at work with various work- and health-related outcomes.
Still, little is known of the military context. This includes the current situation in the Swedish Armed Forces (SAF) where the increased focus on national and collective defense can lead to new conditions regarding job demands. In particular, the ongoing organizational change and expansion highlight the need to attract other groups than men and to retain qualified personnel.
Purpose: The aim of the present study is to investigate the work situation for military officers and specialist officers in the SAF by examining how job demands, job resources, and personal resources relate to work- and health-related outcomes. More specifically, the study examines to what extent qualitative and quantitative job demands, control and social support, and boundary setting strategies and self-efficacy can predict job satisfaction, organizational commitment, burnout, depression, and well-being.
Method: A cross-sectional survey including questions about personal resources, the psychosocial work environment, work-related attitudes and behaviors, and health is currently being administered to officers and specialist officers in the SAF. So far, 375 responses have been received. Data will be analyzed using hierarchical multiple regression models where demographic variables, job demands, job resources, and personal resources will be entered in separate steps and related to the different work- and health-related outcomes.
Results: Preliminary results show that job demands (qualitative and quantitative) are negatively related to job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and well-being and positively related to burnout and depression. Job resources (control and social support) are positively related to job satisfaction, organization commitment, and well-being, and negatively related to burnout and depression. Furthermore, boundary setting strategies and self-efficacy are positively related to job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and well-being, and negatively related to burnout and depression.
Implications: This study adds to the literature by describing how job demands and resources are experienced by employees in the SAF in times of new strategic directions and organizational growth. In addition to describing levels, this study contributes to the understanding of how job demands, job resources, and personal resources associate with work-related attitudes, behaviors, and health in a military context. This can be used to improve the work situation and work-related health and well-being of employees in the SAF and make the defense sector an attractive and sustainable workplace.
Keywords
personal resources, job demands, job resources, work- and health-related outcomes, military context
National Category
Psychology
Research subject
Psychology
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:su:diva-248210 (URN)
Conference
Work2025, 20-22 August 2025, Turku, Finland, Hybrid Conference.
Note
Financial support came from the The Swedish Defence University and Stockholm University.
Session details: 19.6 Open stream.
2025-10-172025-10-172025-10-20Bibliographically approved