Change search
Link to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Publications (10 of 11) Show all publications
Hunt, G., Vaid, R., Pirogov, S., Pfab, A., Ziegenhain, C., Sandberg, R., . . . Mannervik, M. (2024). Tissue-specific RNA Polymerase II promoter-proximal pause release and burst kinetics in a Drosophila embryonic patterning network. Genome Biology, 25(1), Article ID 2.
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Tissue-specific RNA Polymerase II promoter-proximal pause release and burst kinetics in a Drosophila embryonic patterning network
Show others...
2024 (English)In: Genome Biology, ISSN 1465-6906, E-ISSN 1474-760X, Vol. 25, no 1, article id 2Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: Formation of tissue-specific transcriptional programs underlies multicellular development, including dorsoventral (DV) patterning of the Drosophila embryo. This involves interactions between transcriptional enhancers and promoters in a chromatin context, but how the chromatin landscape influences transcription is not fully understood.Results: Here we comprehensively resolve differential transcriptional and chromatin states during Drosophila DV patterning. We find that RNA Polymerase II pausing is established at DV promoters prior to zygotic genome activation (ZGA), that pausing persists irrespective of cell fate, but that release into productive elongation is tightly regulated and accompanied by tissue-specific P-TEFb recruitment. DV enhancers acquire distinct tissue-specific chromatin states through CBP-mediated histone acetylation that predict the transcriptional output of target genes, whereas promoter states are more tissue-invariant. Transcriptome-wide inference of burst kinetics in different cell types revealed that while DV genes are generally characterized by a high burst size, either burst size or frequency can differ between tissues.Conclusions: The data suggest that pausing is established by pioneer transcription factors prior to ZGA and that release from pausing is imparted by enhancer chromatin state to regulate bursting in a tissue-specific manner in the early embryo. Our results uncover how developmental patterning is orchestrated by tissue-specific bursts of transcription from Pol II primed promoters in response to enhancer regulatory cues.

National Category
Developmental Biology
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:su:diva-225993 (URN)10.1186/s13059-023-03135-0 (DOI)001138146600004 ()38166964 (PubMedID)2-s2.0-85181252071 (Scopus ID)
Available from: 2024-01-31 Created: 2024-01-31 Last updated: 2024-01-31Bibliographically approved
Regadas, I., Dahlberg, O., Vaid, R., Ho, O., Belikov, S., Dixit, G., . . . Mannervik, M. (2021). A unique histone 3 lysine 14 chromatin signature underlies tissue-specific gene regulation. Molecular Cell, 81(8), 1766-1780
Open this publication in new window or tab >>A unique histone 3 lysine 14 chromatin signature underlies tissue-specific gene regulation
Show others...
2021 (English)In: Molecular Cell, ISSN 1097-2765, E-ISSN 1097-4164, Vol. 81, no 8, p. 1766-1780Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Organismal development and cell differentiation critically depend on chromatin state transitions. However, certain developmentally regulated genes lack histone 3 lysine 9 and 27 acetylation (H3K9ac and H3K27ac, respectively) and histone 3 lysine 4 (H3K4) methylation, histone modifications common to most active genes. Here we describe a chromatin state featuring unique histone 3 lysine 14 acetylation (H3K14ac) peaks in key tissue-specific genes in Drosophila and human cells. Replacing H3K14 in Drosophila demonstrates that H3K14 is essential for expression of genes devoid of canonical histone modifications in the embryonic gut and larval wing imaginal disc, causing lethality and defective wing patterning. We find that the SWI/SNF protein Brahma (Brm) recognizes H3K14ac, that brm acts in the same genetic pathway as H3K14R, and that chromatin accessibility at H3K14ac-unique genes is decreased in H3K14R mutants. Our results show that acetylation of a single lysine is essential at genes devoid of canonical histone marks and uncover an important requirement for H3K14 in tissue-specific gene regulation.

Keywords
histone acetylation, chromatin state, gene regulation, developmental genomics, Drosophila, SWI/SNF, Brahma, mesenchymal stem cells
National Category
Biological Sciences
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:su:diva-194149 (URN)10.1016/j.molcel.2021.01.041 (DOI)000641452300003 ()33631105 (PubMedID)
Available from: 2021-06-14 Created: 2021-06-14 Last updated: 2022-02-25Bibliographically approved
Ing-Simmons, E., Vaid, R., Yang Bing, X., Levine, M., Mannervik, M. & Vaquerizas, J. M. (2021). Independence of chromatin conformation and gene regulation during Drosophila dorsoventral patterning. Nature Genetics, 53, 487-499
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Independence of chromatin conformation and gene regulation during Drosophila dorsoventral patterning
Show others...
2021 (English)In: Nature Genetics, ISSN 1061-4036, E-ISSN 1546-1718, Vol. 53, p. 487-499Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Chromatin conformation is largely independent of dorsoventral gene expression during early embryonic development in Drosophila. Despite tissue-specific differences in chromatin state and gene expression, three-dimensional chromatin organization is maintained across tissues. The relationship between chromatin organization and gene regulation remains unclear. While disruption of chromatin domains and domain boundaries can lead to misexpression of developmental genes, acute depletion of regulators of genome organization has a relatively small effect on gene expression. It is therefore uncertain whether gene expression and chromatin state drive chromatin organization or whether changes in chromatin organization facilitate cell-type-specific activation of gene expression. Here, using the dorsoventral patterning of the Drosophila melanogaster embryo as a model system, we provide evidence for the independence of chromatin organization and dorsoventral gene expression. We define tissue-specific enhancers and link them to expression patterns using single-cell RNA-seq. Surprisingly, despite tissue-specific chromatin states and gene expression, chromatin organization is largely maintained across tissues. Our results indicate that tissue-specific chromatin conformation is not necessary for tissue-specific gene expression but rather acts as a scaffold facilitating gene expression when enhancers become active.

National Category
Biological Sciences
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:su:diva-194353 (URN)10.1038/s41588-021-00799-x (DOI)000635880700004 ()33795866 (PubMedID)
Available from: 2021-06-21 Created: 2021-06-21 Last updated: 2022-02-25Bibliographically approved
Vaid, R., Wen, J. & Mannervik, M. (2020). Release of promoter–proximal paused Pol II in response to histone deacetylase inhibition. Nucleic Acids Research, 48(9), 4877-4890
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Release of promoter–proximal paused Pol II in response to histone deacetylase inhibition
2020 (English)In: Nucleic Acids Research, ISSN 0305-1048, E-ISSN 1362-4962, Vol. 48, no 9, p. 4877-4890Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

A correlation between histone acetylation and transcription has been noted for a long time, but little is known about what step(s) in the transcription cycle is influenced by acetylation. We have examined the immediate transcriptional response to histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibition, and find that release of promoter–proximal paused RNA polymerase II (Pol II) into elongation is stimulated, whereas initiation is not. Although histone acetylation is elevated globally by HDAC inhibition, less than 100 genes respond within 10 min. These genes are highly paused, are strongly associated with the chromatin regulators NURF and Trithorax, display a greater increase in acetylation of the first nucleosomes than other genes, and become transcriptionally activated by HDAC inhibition. Among these rapidly up-regulated genes are HDAC1 (Rpd3) and subunits of HDAC-containing co-repressor complexes, demonstrating feedback regulation upon HDAC inhibition. Our results suggest that histone acetylation stimulates transcription of paused genes by release of Pol II into elongation, and that increased acetylation is not a consequence of their enhanced expression. We propose that HDACs are major regulators of Pol II pausing and that this partly explains the presence of HDACs at active genes.

National Category
Biochemistry Molecular Biology
Research subject
Molecular Biology
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:su:diva-184299 (URN)10.1093/nar/gkaa234 (DOI)000573914600026 ()
Available from: 2020-08-24 Created: 2020-08-24 Last updated: 2025-02-20Bibliographically approved
Vaid, R. (2020). Transcription regulation across levels of chromatin organization. (Doctoral dissertation). Stockholm: Department of Molecular Biosciences, The Wenner-Gren Institute, Stockholm University
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Transcription regulation across levels of chromatin organization
2020 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic) [Artistic work]
Abstract [en]

With advancements in high-throughput sequencing and high-resolution microscopy techniques, the significance of genome organization in transcription regulation is rapidly unveiling. Nonetheless, we are yet far from completely understanding this key relationship. In this thesis, I utilize some of the cutting-edge high-throughput sequencing techniques along with the power of Drosophila as a model to understand some of the molecular mechanisms active at various levels of chromatin organization that influence gene expression. At the level of DNA sequence, our analysis revealed occupancy of CBP/p300, a transcription co-activator and histone acetyltransferase at insulator regions genome wide, we also identified a novel role of CBP as a barrier to heterochromatin spreading at these insulator regions.

To gain insight into transcription regulation at level of nucleosomes, we perturbed histone modifications either chemically, by inhibiting histone deacetylases (HDACs), or genetically, by creating Drosophila mutants for the H3K14 residue.  We found that the immediate transcriptional response to HDAC inhibition is only up-regulation (96 genes). Moreover, our results suggest that histone acetylation stimulates transcription by releasing promoter-proximal paused Pol II into elongation. In another study we discovered that acetylation of histone 3 lysine 14, H3K14ac, decorates some genes that lack canonical histone marks, thereby constituting a unique chromatin state. Further, Drosophila mutants expressing only H3K14R histones revealed that this residue is vital for expression of these genes, for animal survival and for developmental patterning.

To further understand gene regulation during tissue specification in early embryo development, we utilized dorsoventral (DV) patterning as a model along with PRO-seq, ATAC-seq and ChIP-seq. We identified zygotically transcribed DV patterning genes that are spatially and temporally resolved. Most interestingly, the DV patterning genes are all highly paused and promoter proximal paused Pol II is released into active elongation in a tissue-specific manner. Finally our single cell RNA-seq (scRNA-seq) and HiC data in DV mutants revealed that differential regulation of gene expression occurs independently of differences in higher-order chromatin organization.

Collectively, we provide evidence that transcription is being modulated at various levels of chromatin organization and our results suggest that histone modifications but not higher order chromatin organization influence transcriptional output.

Abstract [sv]

Med framsteg inom high-throughput sekvensering och högupplösta mikroskopitekniker uppenbaras betydelsen av genomets organisation för transkriptionsreglering i snabb takt. Ändå är vi ännu långt ifrån att helt och hållet att förstå detta viktiga förhållande. I denna avhandling använder jag några banbrytande high-throughput sekvenseringstekniker tillsammans med Drosophila som en kraftfull modell för att förstå några av de molekylära mekanismer som är aktiva vid olika nivåer av kromatinorganisering och som påverkar genuttryck. På DNA-sekvensnivå visade vår analys att CBP/p300, en transkriptions-coaktivator och histonacetyltransferas, intar insulator områden över hela genomet. Vi identifierade också en ny roll för CBP som en barriär mot heterokromatinspridning vid dessa insulator-regioner.

För att få insikt i transkriptionsreglering på nukleosomnivå så rubbade vi histonmodifieringar antingen kemiskt, genom att hämma histondeacetylaser (HDAC), eller genetiskt genom att skapa Drosophila mutanter för H3K14. Vi fann att det omedelbara transkriptionella svaret på HDAC-hämning endast omfattar uppreglering (96 gener). Dessutom tyder våra resultat på att histonacetylering stimulerar transkription genom att frisätta promotor-proximal pausad Pol II till elongering. I en annan studie upptäckte vi att acetylering av histon 3 lysin 14, H3K14ac, dekorerar vissa gener som saknar typiska histonmodifieringar och därmed utgör ett unikt kromatintillstånd. Vidare avslöjade Drosophila mutanter som endast uttryckte H3K14R histoner att denna aminosyra är avgörande för uttryck av dessa gener, för djurets överlevnad och för mönsterbildande under djurets utveckling.

För att ytterligare förstå genreglering under specificering av olika vävnader i tidig embryoutveckling använde vi dorsoventral (DV) mönsterbildning som modell tillsammans med PRO-seq, ATAC-seq och ChIP-seq. Vi identifierade zygotiskt transkriberade DV-mönstergener som kunde separeras rumsligt och över tid. Det mest intressanta är att DV-mönstergenerna är högt pausade och att promotor-proximal pausad Pol II frigörs till aktiv elongering på ett vävnadsspecifikt sätt. Slutligen uppenbarade vår enkelcells RNA-seq (scRNA-seq) och HiC-data i DV-mutanter att differentiell reglering av genuttryck sker oberoende av skillnader i högre nivåer av kromatinorganisation.

Sammantaget tillhandahåller vi bevis på att transkription moduleras vid olika nivåer av kromatinorganisation och våra resultat tyder på att histonmodifieringar, men inte högre nivåer av kromatinorganisation, påverkar gentranskription.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Stockholm: Department of Molecular Biosciences, The Wenner-Gren Institute, Stockholm University, 2020. p. 76
Keywords
transcription, chromatin, epigenetics, Drosophila, embryo development
National Category
Cell and Molecular Biology
Research subject
Molecular Bioscience
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:su:diva-184303 (URN)978-91-7911-152-6 (ISBN)978-91-7911-153-3 (ISBN)
Public defence
2020-10-09, sal P216, NPQ-huset, Svante Arrhenius väg 20 A, Stockholm, 10:00 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2020-09-16 Created: 2020-08-24 Last updated: 2022-02-25Bibliographically approved
Kjellin, J., Pränting, M., Bach, F., Vaid, R., Edelbroek, B., Li, Z., . . . Söderbom, F. (2019). Investigation of the host transcriptional response to intracellular bacterial infection using Dictyostelium discoideum as a host model. BMC Genomics, 20(1), Article ID 961.
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Investigation of the host transcriptional response to intracellular bacterial infection using Dictyostelium discoideum as a host model
Show others...
2019 (English)In: BMC Genomics, E-ISSN 1471-2164, Vol. 20, no 1, article id 961Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: During infection by intracellular pathogens, a highly complex interplay occurs between the infected cell trying to degrade the invader and the pathogen which actively manipulates the host cell to enable survival and proliferation. Many intracellular pathogens pose important threats to human health and major efforts have been undertaken to better understand the host-pathogen interactions that eventually determine the outcome of the infection. Over the last decades, the unicellular eukaryote Dictyostelium discoideum has become an established infection model, serving as a surrogate macrophage that can be infected with a wide range of intracellular pathogens. In this study, we use high-throughput RNA-sequencing to analyze the transcriptional response of D. discoideum when infected with Mycobacterium marinum and Legionella pneumophila. The results were compared to available data from human macrophages.

Results: The majority of the transcriptional regulation triggered by the two pathogens was found to be unique for each bacterial challenge. Hallmark transcriptional signatures were identified for each infection, e.g. induction of endosomal sorting complexes required for transport (ESCRT) and autophagy genes in response to M. marinum and inhibition of genes associated with the translation machinery and energy metabolism in response to L. pneumophila. However, a common response to the pathogenic bacteria was also identified, which was not induced by non-pathogenic food bacteria. Finally, comparison with available data sets of regulation in human monocyte derived macrophages shows that the elicited response in D. discoideum is in many aspects similar to what has been observed in human immune cells in response to Mycobacterium tuberculosis and L. pneumophila.

Conclusions: Our study presents high-throughput characterization of D. discoideum transcriptional response to intracellular pathogens using RNA-seq. We demonstrate that the transcriptional response is in essence distinct to each pathogen and that in many cases, the corresponding regulation is recapitulated in human macrophages after infection by mycobacteria and L. pneumophila. This indicates that host-pathogen interactions are evolutionary conserved, derived from the early interactions between free-living phagocytic cells and bacteria. Taken together, our results strengthen the use of D. discoideum as a general infection model.

Keywords
Host-pathogen, Infection, High-throughput sequencing, Mycobacteria, Legionella, Dictyostelium discoideum, Macrophage, Infection model, Pathogenic bacteria, Intracellular pathogen
National Category
Biological Sciences Microbiology in the medical area
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:su:diva-178682 (URN)10.1186/s12864-019-6269-x (DOI)000508019700003 ()31823727 (PubMedID)
Available from: 2020-02-14 Created: 2020-02-14 Last updated: 2024-01-17Bibliographically approved
Philip, P., Boija, A., Vaid, R., Churcher, A. M., Meyers, D. J., Cole, P. A., . . . Stenberg, P. (2015). CBP binding outside of promoters and enhancers in Drosophila melanogaster. Epigenetics & Chromatin, 8, Article ID 48.
Open this publication in new window or tab >>CBP binding outside of promoters and enhancers in Drosophila melanogaster
Show others...
2015 (English)In: Epigenetics & Chromatin, E-ISSN 1756-8935, Vol. 8, article id 48Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: CREB-binding protein (CBP, also known as nejire) is a transcriptional co-activator that is conserved in metazoans. CBP plays an important role in embryonic development and cell differentiation and mutations in CBP can lead to various diseases in humans. In addition, CBP and the related p300 protein have successfully been used to predict enhancers in both humans and flies when they occur with monomethylation of histone H3 on lysine 4 (H3K4me1). Results: Here, we compare CBP chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing data from Drosophila S2 cells with modENCODE data and show that CBP is bound at genomic sites with a wide range of functions. As expected, we find that CBP is bound at active promoters and enhancers. In addition, we find that the strongest CBP sites in the genome are found at Polycomb response elements embedded in histone H3 lysine 27 trimethylated (H3K27me3) chromatin, where they correlate with binding of the Pho repressive complex. Interestingly, we find that CBP also binds to most insulators in the genome. At a subset of these, CBP may regulate insulating activity, measured as the ability to prevent repressive H3K27 methylation from spreading into adjacent chromatin. Conclusions: We conclude that CBP could be involved in a much wider range of functions than has previously been appreciated, including Polycomb repression and insulator activity. In addition, we discuss the possibility that a common role for CBP at all functional elements may be to regulate interactions between distant chromosomal regions and speculate that CBP is controlling higher order chromatin organization.

Keywords
CBP/p300, Drosophila melanogaster, Chromatin structure, Gene regulation, Insulators, Polycomb response elements
National Category
Biological Sciences
Research subject
Developmental Biology
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:su:diva-124741 (URN)10.1186/s13072-015-0042-4 (DOI)000365564300001 ()
Available from: 2016-01-09 Created: 2016-01-04 Last updated: 2023-08-21Bibliographically approved
Hunt, G., Vaid, R., Pirogov, S., Pfab, A., Ziegenhain, C., Sandberg, R., . . . Mannervik, M.Comprehensive interrogation of a Drosophila embryonic patterning network reveals the impact of chromatin state on tissue-specific burst kinetics and RNA Polymerase II promoter-proximal pause release.
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Comprehensive interrogation of a Drosophila embryonic patterning network reveals the impact of chromatin state on tissue-specific burst kinetics and RNA Polymerase II promoter-proximal pause release
Show others...
(English)Manuscript (preprint) (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Formation of tissue-specific transcriptional programs underlies multicellular development, but how the chromatin landscape influences transcription is not fully understood. Here we comprehensively resolve differential transcriptional and chromatin states during Drosophila dorsoventral (DV) patterning. We find that RNA Polymerase II pausing is established at DV promoters prior to zygotic genome activation (ZGA), that pausing persists irrespective of cell fate, but that release into productive elongation is tightly regulated and accompanied by tissue-specific P-TEFb recruitment. DV enhancers acquire distinct tissue-specific chromatin states through CBP-mediated histone acetylation that predict the transcriptional output of target genes, whereas promoter states are more tissue invariant. Transcriptome-wide inference of burst kinetics in different cell types revealed that while DV genes are generally characterized by a high burst size, either burst size or frequency can differ between tissues. The data suggest that pausing is established by pioneer transcription factors prior to ZGA and that release from pausing is imparted by enhancer chromatin state to regulate bursting in a tissue-specific manner in the early embryo. Our results uncover how developmental patterning is orchestrated by tissue-specific bursts of transcription from Pol II primed promoters in response to enhancer regulatory cues.

National Category
Developmental Biology
Research subject
Molecular Biology
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:su:diva-210722 (URN)10.1101/2022.10.25.513691 (DOI)
Available from: 2022-10-25 Created: 2022-10-25 Last updated: 2022-10-26
Dahlberg, O., Vaid, R. & Mannervik, M.Histone 3 lysine 14 is essential in Drosophila.
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Histone 3 lysine 14 is essential in Drosophila
(English)Manuscript (preprint) (Other academic)
National Category
Natural Sciences
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:su:diva-103080 (URN)
Available from: 2014-05-02 Created: 2014-05-02 Last updated: 2022-02-23Bibliographically approved
Ing-Simmons, E., Vaid, R., Mannervik, M. & Vaquerizas, J. M.Independence of 3D chromatin conformation and gene regulation during Drosophila dorsoventral patterning.
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Independence of 3D chromatin conformation and gene regulation during Drosophila dorsoventral patterning
(English)Manuscript (preprint) (Other academic)
National Category
Cell and Molecular Biology
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:su:diva-184302 (URN)10.1101/2020.07.07.186791 (DOI)
Available from: 2020-08-24 Created: 2020-08-24 Last updated: 2022-02-25Bibliographically approved
Organisations
Identifiers
ORCID iD: ORCID iD iconorcid.org/0000-0002-2074-5080

Search in DiVA

Show all publications