Change search
Link to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Publications (10 of 17) Show all publications
Wojt, I. R., Cairns, R., Gillooly, I., Patanwala, A. E. & Tan, E. C. K. (2022). Clinical factors associated with increased length of stay and readmission in patients with medication-related hospital admissions: a retrospective study. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 18(7), 3184-3190
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Clinical factors associated with increased length of stay and readmission in patients with medication-related hospital admissions: a retrospective study
Show others...
2022 (English)In: Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, ISSN 1551-7411, E-ISSN 1934-8150, Vol. 18, no 7, p. 3184-3190Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: Adverse drug events (ADEs) remain a key contributor to hospitalisations, resulting in long hospital stays and readmissions. Information pertaining to the specific medications and clinical factors associated with these outcomes is limited. Hence, a better understanding of these factors and their relationship to ADEs is required.

Objectives: To investigate medications involved, clinical manifestations of ADE-related hospitalisations, and their association with length of stay and readmission.

Methods: A retrospective medical record review of patients admitted to a major, tertiary referral hospital in NSW, Australia, from January 2019 to August 2020 was conducted. ADEs were identified using Australian Refined Diagnosis Related Group (AR-DRG) codes: X40, X61, X62 and X64. Medications were classified per the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification system and clinical symptoms were classified per the International Classification of Disease (ICD) 9-CM. Logistic regression was performed to assess the relationship between medication and presentation classes with length of stay (≥2 days vs <2 days) and readmission.

Results: There were 125 patients who met inclusion criteria (median age = 64 [interquartile range, 45–75] years; 53.6% male). Anti-thrombotic agents, opioids, antidepressants, antipsychotics, insulins and NSAIDs were the most implicated pharmacological classes. Neurological medications and falls were associated with a length of stay ≥2 days (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 3.92, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.48–10.33 and aOR 3.24, 95% CI 1.05–10.06, respectively). Neurological medications and neurological and cognitive disorders were associated with an increased likelihood of 90-day readmission (aOR 2.63, 95% CI 1.05–6.57 and aOR 3.20, 95% CI 1.17–8.75, respectively).

Conclusion: This study identified neurological medications as high-risk for increased length of stay and readmission in those hospitalised due to ADEs. This highlights the need for judicious prescribing and monitoring of these medications.

Keywords
Adverse drug events, Length of stay, Readmission, Neurological medicines, Medication-related hospitalisation, Medication safety
National Category
Social and Clinical Pharmacy
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:su:diva-206193 (URN)10.1016/j.sapharm.2021.09.003 (DOI)000805049300010 ()2-s2.0-85115312911 (Scopus ID)
Available from: 2022-06-22 Created: 2022-06-22 Last updated: 2022-06-22Bibliographically approved
Aljeaidi, M. S. & Tan, E. C. K. (2022). The association between polypharmacy and cognitive ability in older adults: A national cohort study. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 18(3), 2505-2509
Open this publication in new window or tab >>The association between polypharmacy and cognitive ability in older adults: A national cohort study
2022 (English)In: Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, ISSN 1551-7411, E-ISSN 1934-8150, Vol. 18, no 3, p. 2505-2509Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: Polypharmacy, the use of multiple medications by one individual, may be associated with adverse health outcomes including poor cognition. However, it remains unclear whether a longitudinal relationship exists.

Objectives: To investigate the association between polypharmacy and 3-year cognitive ability in older adults.

Methods: A longitudinal cohort study of older adults 65 years and older, residing in the community, who participated in waves 12 (2012), 13 (2013) and 16 (2016) of the Household Income and Labour Dynamics (HILDA) Survey was conducted. Polypharmacy was defined as the regular use of 5 or more prescription medications. Cognitive ability was assessed using backwards digit span test (BDS), 25-item version of the National Adult Reading Test (NART-25) and symbol-digit modalities test (SDM). Linear regression was used to test the longitudinal association between polypharmacy and cognitive test scores at 3 years. All analyses were adjusted for age, sex, education, comorbidities, socioeconomic and lifestyle factors, and baseline cognitive test scores.

Results: A total of 2141 participants (mean age 72.9 years, 54.4% female) were included in the study sample. Polypharmacy was present in 27.3%. After adjusting for potential confounders, polypharmacy was negatively associated with cognitive ability at 3 years: BDS: −0.067 (95% CI = −0.353 to −0.051), NART-25: −0.071 (95% CI = −1.428 to −0.294), SDM: −0.073 (95% CI = −2.960 to −0.696).

Conclusion: Polypharmacy was associated with poorer cognitive ability at 3 years, even after adjusting for comorbidities and other confounders. Future research should consider the long-term impact of polypharmacy on cognitive ability, and identify strategies to optimise medication use and cognition in older adults.

Keywords
polypharmacy, cognition, aged, longitudinal studies, HILDA
National Category
Gerontology, specialising in Medical and Health Sciences Neurosciences
Research subject
Psychology
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:su:diva-202734 (URN)10.1016/j.sapharm.2021.04.018 (DOI)000751828900016 ()
Available from: 2022-03-14 Created: 2022-03-14 Last updated: 2023-01-02Bibliographically approved
Tan, E. C. K., Lexomboon, D., Häbel, H., Fastbom, J., Eriksdotter, M., Johnell, K. & Sandborgh-Englund, G. (2022). Validating a model for medication-related dental outcomes in older people. Oral Diseases, 28(6), 1697-1704
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Validating a model for medication-related dental outcomes in older people
Show others...
2022 (English)In: Oral Diseases, ISSN 1354-523X, E-ISSN 1601-0825, Vol. 28, no 6, p. 1697-1704Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Objectives: To externally validate a model for medication-related dental outcomes in (a) a general older population with dementia and (b) a matched population without dementia.

Subjects and Methods: This validation study used population-based data from seven Swedish national registers (2008–2017). Individuals aged 60+ with dementia were matched to those without dementia on age, gender, and county of residence at the date of diagnosis (index date). The exposure was continuous use of xerogenic medications during the 3-year period before index date. The primary outcome was the number of tooth extraction and restorative procedures within 3 years after index date.

Results: A total of 334,220 individuals were included in the final sample. In the dementia cohort, the use of urological drugs (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 1.08, 95% CI 1.03–1.13), respiratory medicines (IRR 1.10, 95% CI 1.04–1.17), and proton-pump inhibitors (IRR 1.09, 95% CI 1.05–1.13) was associated with the primary outcome. In the non-dementia cohort, respiratory medicines (IRR 1.03, CI 1.00–1.05), proton-pump inhibitors (IRR 1.06, CI 1.04–1.08), opioids (IRR 1.05, CI 1.03–1.07), and antidepressants (IRR 1.06, CI 1.04–1.08) were associated with the primary outcome.

Conclusions: Although there were differences in prescription patterns, the model performed similarly in both those with and without dementia.

Keywords
aged, dementia, dental care, polypharmacy, tooth loss, xerostomia
National Category
Public Health, Global Health and Social Medicine
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:su:diva-195625 (URN)10.1111/odi.13864 (DOI)000646707300001 ()33780083 (PubMedID)2-s2.0-85104417909 (Scopus ID)
Available from: 2021-08-24 Created: 2021-08-24 Last updated: 2025-02-20Bibliographically approved
Liau, S. J., Lalic, S., Sluggett, J. K., Cesari, M., Onder, G., Vetrano, D. L., . . . Bell, J. S. (2021). Medication Management in Frail Older People: Consensus Principles for Clinical Practice, Research, and Education. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 22(1), 43-49
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Medication Management in Frail Older People: Consensus Principles for Clinical Practice, Research, and Education
Show others...
2021 (English)In: Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, ISSN 1525-8610, E-ISSN 1538-9375, Vol. 22, no 1, p. 43-49Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Frailty is a geriatric condition associated with increased vulnerability to adverse drug events and medication-related harm. Existing clinical practice guidelines rarely provide medication management recommendations specific to frail older people. This report presents international consensus principles, generated by the Optimizing Geriatric Pharmacotherapy through Pharmacoepidemiology Network, related to medication management in frail older people. This consensus comprises 7 principles for clinical practice, 6 principles for research, and 4 principles for education. Principles for clinical practice include (1) perform medication reconciliation and maintain an up-to-date medication list; (2) assess and plan based on individual's capacity to self-manage medications; (3) ensure appropriate prescribing and deprescribing; (4) simplify medication regimens when appropriate to reduce unnecessary burden; (5) be alert to the contribution of medications to geriatric syndromes; (6) regularly review medication regimens to align with changing goals of care; and (7) facilitate multidisciplinary communication among patients, caregivers, and healthcare teams. Principles for research include (1) include frail older people in randomized controlled trials; (2) consider frailty status as an effect modifier; (3) ensure collection and reporting of outcome measures important in frailty; (4) assess impact of frailty on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics; (5) encourage frailty research in under-researched settings; and (6) utilize routinely collected linked health data. Principles for education include (1) provide undergraduate and post-graduate education on frailty; (2) minimize low-value care related to medication management; (3) improve health and medication literacy; and (4) incorporate evidence in relation to frailty into clinical practice guidelines. These principles for clinical practice, research and education highlight different considerations for optimizing medication management in frail older people. These principles can be used in conjunction with existing best practice guidelines to help achieve optimal health outcomes for this vulnerable population. Implementation of the principles will require multidisciplinary collaboration between healthcare professionals, researchers, educators, organizational leaders, and policymakers.

Keywords
Frailty, medication therapy management, aged, inappropriate prescribing, polypharmacy, multimorbidity
National Category
Geriatrics
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:su:diva-190061 (URN)10.1016/j.jamda.2020.05.004 (DOI)000604714200009 ()32669236 (PubMedID)
Available from: 2021-02-23 Created: 2021-02-23 Last updated: 2022-02-25Bibliographically approved
Wojt, I. R., Cairns, R., Clough, A. J. & Tan, E. C. K. (2021). The Prevalence and Characteristics of Psychotropic-Related Hospitalizations in Older People: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 22(6), 1206-1214
Open this publication in new window or tab >>The Prevalence and Characteristics of Psychotropic-Related Hospitalizations in Older People: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
2021 (English)In: Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, ISSN 1525-8610, E-ISSN 1538-9375, Vol. 22, no 6, p. 1206-1214Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Objectives: To assess the prevalence and characteristics of psychotropic medication-related hospitalizations in older people.

Design: Systematic review with meta-analysis.

Setting and Participants: Older adults (> 65 years of age) with psychotropic-related hospitalizations.

Methods: A search of published literature was performed in Medline, Embase, CINAHL, and Scopus from 2010 to March 2020. Three authors independently screened titles, abstracts, and full texts of relevant studies for relevance. Two authors independently extracted full text data, including characteristics, measures of causality, prevalence data, and performed quality assessment. A meta-analysis was conducted to estimate pooled prevalence and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of psychotropic-related hospitalizations using random effects models. Heterogeneity was explored using subgroup analyses.

Results: Of 815 potentially relevant studies, 11 were included in the final analysis. Five studies were crosssectional studies, 5 were cohort studies, and 1 was a case control study. The majority of studies were rated as good quality. Psychotropic medications contributed to 2.1% (95% CI 1.2%-3.3%) of total hospitalizations and 11.3% (95% CI 8.2%-14.8%) of adverse drug event-related hospitalizations. The main psychotropic medications attributable to hospitalizations were antidepressants, hypnotics, sedatives, and antipsychotics.

Conclusions and Implications: Psychotropic medications are a significant contributor to hospitalizations in older adults. The risk of hospitalization was greatest for those taking antidepressants, antipsychotics, hypnotics, and sedatives. Future studies should aim to address specific medication subgroups and implement uniform adverse drug event-related classification systems to improve comparability across studies.

Keywords
Aged, psychotropic drugs, hospitalization, adverse drug event, prevalence
National Category
Geriatrics
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:su:diva-196298 (URN)10.1016/j.jamda.2020.12.035 (DOI)000659464600020 ()33539820 (PubMedID)
Available from: 2021-09-06 Created: 2021-09-06 Last updated: 2022-02-25Bibliographically approved
Tan, E. C. K., Johnell, K., Bell, J. S., Garcia-Ptacek, S., Fastbom, J., Nordström, P. & Eriksdotter, M. (2020). Do Acetylcholinesterase Inhibitors Prevent or Delay Psychotropic Prescribing in People With Dementia? Analyses of the Swedish Dementia Registry. The American journal of geriatric psychiatry, 28(1), 108-117
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Do Acetylcholinesterase Inhibitors Prevent or Delay Psychotropic Prescribing in People With Dementia? Analyses of the Swedish Dementia Registry
Show others...
2020 (English)In: The American journal of geriatric psychiatry, ISSN 1064-7481, E-ISSN 1545-7214, Vol. 28, no 1, p. 108-117Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Objectives: To investigate whether acetylcholinesterase inhibitor (AChEI) use prevents or delays subsequent initiation of psychotropic medications in people with Alzheimer's disease (AD) and Lewy body dementia (LBD). Methods: Cohort study of 17,763 people with AD and LBD, without prior psychotropic use at time of dementia diagnosis, registered in the Swedish Dementia Registry from 2007 to 2015. Propensity score-matched regression models were used to compute hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between time-dependent AChEI use and risk of psychotropic initiation. Results: Compared with matched comparators, AChEI users had a lower risk of antipsychotic ( HR: 0.85, 95%CI: 0.75-0.95) and anxiolytic (HR: 0.76, 95%CI: 0.72-0.80) initiation. In subanalyses, this association remained significant at higher AChEI doses, and in AD but not LBD. There were no associations between AChEI use and initiation of antidepressants or hypnotics. Conclusion: AChEI use may be associated with lower risk of antipsychotic and anxiolytic initiation in AD, particularly at higher doses. Further investigation into aceytylcholinesterase inhibitors in behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia management in LBD is warranted.

Keywords
Dementia, psychotropics, Alzheimer's disease, Lewy body dementia, antipsychotics, behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia
National Category
Geriatrics Psychiatry
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:su:diva-177792 (URN)10.1016/j.jagp.2019.06.008 (DOI)000500700200014 ()31331724 (PubMedID)
Available from: 2020-01-20 Created: 2020-01-20 Last updated: 2022-02-26Bibliographically approved
Aljeaidi, M., Keen, C., Bell, J. S., Cooper, T., Robson, L. & Tan, E. C. K. (2020). Dry Eyes, Ocular Lubricants, and Use of Systemic Medications Known or Suspected to Cause Dry Eyes in Residents of Aged Care Services. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(15), Article ID 5349.
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Dry Eyes, Ocular Lubricants, and Use of Systemic Medications Known or Suspected to Cause Dry Eyes in Residents of Aged Care Services
Show others...
2020 (English)In: International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, ISSN 1661-7827, E-ISSN 1660-4601, Vol. 17, no 15, article id 5349Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Ocular issues are common, burdensome, and under-researched among residents of aged care services. This study aims to investigate the prevalence of dry eyes or use of ocular lubricants among residents, and the possible association with systemic medications known or suspected to cause dry eyes. A cross-sectional study of 383 residents of six aged care services in South Australia was conducted. Data were extracted from participants' medical histories, medication charts, and validated assessments. The main exposure was systemic medications known to cause, contribute to, or aggravate dry eyes. The primary outcome was documented dry eyes or regular administration of ocular lubricants. Logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between systemic medications and dry eyes/use of ocular lubricants. Dry eyes were documented for 53 (13.8%) residents and 98 (25.6%) residents were administered ocular lubricants. Overall, 116 (30.3%) residents had documented dry eyes/used ocular lubricants. Of these, half (n= 58) were taking a medication known to cause, contribute to, or aggravate dry eyes. Taking one or more medications listed as known to cause dry eyes was associated with having dry eyes/use of ocular lubricants (OR 1.83, 95% CI 1.15-2.94). In sub-analyses, no individual medication was associated with dry eyes/use of ocular lubricants. Dry eyes and use of ocular lubricants are common in residential aged care. Our hypothesis generating findings suggest the need for further research into the clinical significance of systemic medications as a possible cause of dry eyes.

Keywords
dry eye syndromes, drug side effects, aged, dementia, frailty, long-term care
National Category
Geriatrics Psychology
Research subject
Psychology
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:su:diva-185436 (URN)10.3390/ijerph17155349 (DOI)000559165100001 ()32722254 (PubMedID)
Available from: 2020-10-16 Created: 2020-10-16 Last updated: 2022-02-25Bibliographically approved
Kerry, M., Bell, J. S., Keen, C., Sluggett, J. K., Ilomäki, J., Jokanovic, N., . . . Tan, E. C. K. (2020). Multiple antihypertensive use and risk of mortality in residents of aged care services: a prospective cohort study. Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, 32(8), 1541-1549
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Multiple antihypertensive use and risk of mortality in residents of aged care services: a prospective cohort study
Show others...
2020 (English)In: Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, ISSN 1594-0667, E-ISSN 1720-8319, Vol. 32, no 8, p. 1541-1549Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Aims The objective of this study is to investigate the association between multiple antihypertensive use and mortality in residents with diagnosed hypertension, and whether dementia and frailty modify this association.

Methods This is a two-year prospective cohort study of 239 residents with diagnosed hypertension receiving antihypertensive therapy across six residential aged care services in South Australia. Data were obtained from electronic medical records, medication charts and validated assessments. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality and the secondary outcome was cardiovascular-related hospitalizations. Inverse probability weighted Cox models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for all-cause mortality. Covariates included age, sex, dementia severity, frailty status, Charlson's comorbidity index and cardiovascular comorbidities.

Results The study sample (mean age of 88.1 +/- 6.3 years; 79% female) included 70 (29.3%) residents using one antihypertensive and 169 (70.7%) residents using multiple antihypertensives. The crude incidence rates for death were higher in residents using multiple antihypertensives compared with residents using monotherapy (251 and 173/1000 person-years, respectively). After weighting, residents who used multiple antihypertensives had a greater risk of mortality compared with monotherapy (HR 1.40, 95%CI 1.03-1.92). After stratifying by dementia diagnosis and frailty status, the risk only remained significant in residents with diagnosed dementia (HR 1.91, 95%CI 1.20-3.04) and who were most frail (HR 2.52, 95%CI 1.13-5.64). Rate of cardiovascular-related hospitalizations did not differ among residents using multiple compared to monotherapy (rate ratio 0.73, 95%CI 0.32-1.67).

Conclusions Multiple antihypertensive use is associated with an increased risk of mortality in residents with diagnosed hypertension, particularly in residents with dementia and among those who are most frail.

Keywords
Antihypertensive agents, Hypertension, Mortality, Nursing homes, Residential facilities, Long-term care
National Category
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Disease
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:su:diva-185428 (URN)10.1007/s40520-019-01336-x (DOI)000563125700016 ()31473981 (PubMedID)
Available from: 2020-10-13 Created: 2020-10-13 Last updated: 2025-02-10Bibliographically approved
Ding, L., Liang, Y., Tan, E. C. K., Hu, Y., Zhang, C., Liu, Y., . . . Wang, R. (2020). Smoking, heavy drinking, physical inactivity, and obesity among middle-aged and older adults in China: cross-sectional findings from the baseline survey of CHARLS 2011-2012. BMC Public Health, 20(1), Article ID 1062.
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Smoking, heavy drinking, physical inactivity, and obesity among middle-aged and older adults in China: cross-sectional findings from the baseline survey of CHARLS 2011-2012
Show others...
2020 (English)In: BMC Public Health, E-ISSN 1471-2458, Vol. 20, no 1, article id 1062Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: Prevention and control of cardiometabolic conditions and cardiovascular disease (CVD) in China may contribute to sustainable CVD reduction globally, given the fact that one-fifth of the worldwide population is in China. Knowing the distribution of behavioral risk factors (e.g., smoking and physical inactivity), especially at a national level in China, would be extremely relevant to the field of public health and CVD prevention. The objectives of this study were to investigate the nationwide prevalence of obesity, smoking, heavy drinking, and physical inactivity in Chinese adults, and further explore whether cardiometabolic conditions would modify the distribution of behavioral risk factors.

Methods: This population-based study is based on the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (2011-2012), including 17,302 adults (>= 45 years, mean age 59.67 years, female 51.66%) from 25 provinces in China. Data on demographics, lifestyle factors, health status and history of diseases were collected via structured interviews and laboratory tests. Smoking, heavy drinking, obesity, and physical inactivity were defined following standard guidelines. We performed descriptive analysis and logistic regressions in this study.

Results: The overall prevalence of heavy drinking, obesity, current smoking, and physical inactivity among middle-aged and older adults was 7.23% (95% confidence interval 6.53-7.29%), 11.53% (10.43-12.62%), 27.46% (26.30-28.62%), and 44.06% (41.19-46.92%), respectively. The prevalence varied between rural and urban areas as well as among geographic areas, with higher prevalence in the Northern and Northeastern regions. Heavy drinking and obesity were significantly associated with incident hypertension, diabetes, and high cholesterol; while current smoking was significantly associated with incident hypertension. Compared with healthy individuals, participants who self-reported a diagnosis of hypertension, high cholesterol, or diabetes were less likely to smoke currently and drink alcohol heavily, but more likely to be physically inactive and obese.

Conclusions: Among Chinese middle-aged and older adults, the prevalence of behavioral risk factors varies by geographic region. Further effort is required to improve physical activity and fitness for Chinese adults, especially those with cardiometabolic conditions.

Keywords
Behavioral risk factors, Public health, Cardiovascular disease prevention, Diabetes, Hypertension, High cholesterol
National Category
Public Health, Global Health and Social Medicine
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:su:diva-184510 (URN)10.1186/s12889-020-08625-5 (DOI)000550105900006 ()32631359 (PubMedID)
Available from: 2020-09-11 Created: 2020-09-11 Last updated: 2025-02-20Bibliographically approved
Wang, K. N., Bell, J. S., Tan, E. C. K., Gilmartin-Thomas, J. F. M., Dooley, M. J. & Ilomaki, J. (2020). Statin use and fall-related hospitalizations among residents of long-term care facilities: A case-control study. Journal of Clinical Lipidology, 14(4), 507-514
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Statin use and fall-related hospitalizations among residents of long-term care facilities: A case-control study
Show others...
2020 (English)In: Journal of Clinical Lipidology, ISSN 1933-2874, E-ISSN 1876-4789, Vol. 14, no 4, p. 507-514Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

BACKGROUND: Statins are associated with muscle-related adverse events, but few studies have investigated the association with fall-related hospitalizations among residents of long-term care facilities (LTCFs).

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study is to investigate whether statin use is associated with fall-related hospitalizations from LTCFs.

METHODS: A case-control study was conducted among residents aged >= 65 years admitted to hospital from 2013 to 2015. Cases (n = 332) were residents admitted for falls and fall-related injuries. Controls (n = 332) were selected from patients admitted for reasons other than cardiovascular and diabetes. Cases and controls were matched 1:1 by age (+/- 2 years), index date of admission (+/- 6 months), and sex. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using conditional logistic regression, after considering for history of falls, hypertension, dementia, functional comorbidity index, polypharmacy (>= 9 regular preadmission medications), and fall-risk medications. Subanalyses were performed for individual statins, dementia, and statin intensity.

RESULTS: Overall, 43.1% of cases and 27.1% of controls used statins. Statins were associated with fall-related hospitalizations (aOR = 2.24, 95% CI 1.56-3.23), in particular simvastatin (aOR = 2.26, 95% CI 1.22-4.20) and atorvastatin (aOR = 2.08, 95% CI 1.33-3.24). Statins were associated with fall-related hospitalizations in residents with (aOR = 2.34, 95% CI 1.33-4.11) and without dementia (aOR = 2.30, 95% CI 1.46-3.63). There was no association between statin intensity and fall-related hospitalizations (aOR = 0.78, 95% CI 0.43-1.40).

CONCLUSION: This study suggests a possible association between statin use and fall-related hospitalizations among residents living in LTCFs. However, there was minimal evidence for a relationship between statin intensity and fall-related hospitalizations. Further research is required to substantiate these hypothesis-generating findings.

Keywords
Statins, Falls, Hospitalization, Long-term care, Nursing homes
National Category
Geriatrics
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:su:diva-186694 (URN)10.1016/j.jacl.2020.05.008 (DOI)000577542700016 ()32571729 (PubMedID)
Available from: 2020-11-17 Created: 2020-11-17 Last updated: 2022-02-25Bibliographically approved
Organisations
Identifiers
ORCID iD: ORCID iD iconorcid.org/0000-0003-2922-8837

Search in DiVA

Show all publications