System disruptions
There are recurring service disruptions on some of the search portals due to high traffic. We are working to resolve the issue, you may temporarily encounter an error message.
Change search
Link to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Publications (4 of 4) Show all publications
Ford, A. K., Visser, P. M., van Herk, M. J., Jongepier, E. & Bonito, V. (2021). First insights into the impacts of benthic cyanobacterial mats on fish herbivory functions on a nearshore coral reef. Scientific Reports, 11(1), Article ID 7147.
Open this publication in new window or tab >>First insights into the impacts of benthic cyanobacterial mats on fish herbivory functions on a nearshore coral reef
Show others...
2021 (English)In: Scientific Reports, E-ISSN 2045-2322, Vol. 11, no 1, article id 7147Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Benthic cyanobacterial mats (BCMs) are becoming increasingly common on coral reefs. In Fiji, blooms generally occur in nearshore areas during warm months but some are starting to prevail through cold months. Many fundamental knowledge gaps about BCM proliferation remain, including their composition and how they influence reef processes. This study examined a seasonal BCM bloom occurring in a 17-year-old no-take inshore reef area in Fiji. Surveys quantified the coverage of various BCM-types and estimated the biomass of key herbivorous fish functional groups. Using remote video observations, we compared fish herbivory (bite rates) on substrate covered primarily by BCMs (>50%) to substrate lacking BCMs (<10%) and looked for indications of fish (opportunistically) consuming BCMs. Samples of different BCM-types were analysed by microscopy and next-generation amplicon sequencing (16S rRNA). In total, BCMs covered 51<plus/minus>4% (mean +/- s.e.m) of the benthos. Herbivorous fish biomass was relatively high (212 +/- 36 kg/ha) with good representation across functional groups. Bite rates were significantly reduced on BCM-dominated substratum, and no fish were unambiguously observed consuming BCMs. Seven different BCM-types were identified, with most containing a complex consortium of cyanobacteria. These results provide insight into BCM composition and impacts on inshore Pacific reefs.

National Category
Biological Sciences
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:su:diva-193116 (URN)10.1038/s41598-021-84016-z (DOI)000636269100007 ()33785764 (PubMedID)
Available from: 2021-05-14 Created: 2021-05-14 Last updated: 2022-09-15Bibliographically approved
Ford, A. K., Jouffray, J.-B., Norström, A., Moore, B. R., Nugues, M. M., Williams, G. J., . . . Ferse, S. C. A. (2020). Local Human Impacts Disrupt Relationships Between Benthic Reef Assemblages and Environmental Predictors. Frontiers in Marine Science, 7, Article ID 571115.
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Local Human Impacts Disrupt Relationships Between Benthic Reef Assemblages and Environmental Predictors
Show others...
2020 (English)In: Frontiers in Marine Science, E-ISSN 2296-7745, Vol. 7, article id 571115Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Human activities are changing ecosystems at an unprecedented rate, yet large-scale studies into how local human impacts alter natural systems and interact with other aspects of global change are still lacking. Here we provide empirical evidence that local human impacts fundamentally alter relationships between ecological communities and environmental drivers. Using tropical coral reefs as a study system, we investigated the influence of contrasting levels of local human impact using a spatially extensive dataset spanning 62 outer reefs around inhabited Pacific islands. We tested how local human impacts (low versus high determined using a threshold of 25 people km(-2) reef) affected benthic community (i) structure, and (ii) relationships with environmental predictors using pre-defined models and model selection tools. Data on reef depth, benthic assemblages, and herbivorous fish communities were collected from field surveys. Additional data on thermal stress, storm exposure, and market gravity (a function of human population size and reef accessibility) were extracted from public repositories. Findings revealed that reefs subject to high local human impact were characterised by relatively more turf algae (>10% higher mean absolute coverage) and lower live coral cover (9% less mean absolute coverage) than reefs subject to low local human impact, but had similar macroalgal cover and coral morphological composition. Models based on spatio-physical predictors were significantly more accurate in explaining the variation of benthic assemblages at sites with low (mean adjusted-R-2 = 0.35) rather than high local human impact, where relationships became much weaker (mean adjusted-R-2 = 0.10). Model selection procedures also identified a distinct shift in the relative importance of different herbivorous fish functional groups in explaining benthic communities depending on the local human impact level. These results demonstrate that local human impacts alter natural systems and indicate that projecting climate change impacts may be particularly challenging at reefs close to higher human populations, where dependency and pressure on ecosystem services are highest.

Keywords
climate change, reef degradation, ecological reorganisation, ecological homogenisation, generalised additive models, model selection
National Category
Biological Sciences
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:su:diva-187515 (URN)10.3389/fmars.2020.571115 (DOI)000580605000001 ()
Available from: 2020-12-11 Created: 2020-12-11 Last updated: 2022-02-25Bibliographically approved
McAndrews, R. S., Eich, A., Ford, A. K., Bejarano, S., Lal, R. R. & Ferse, S. C. A. (2019). Algae sediment dynamics are mediated by herbivorous fishes on a nearshore coral reef. Coral reefs (Print), 38(3), 431-441
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Algae sediment dynamics are mediated by herbivorous fishes on a nearshore coral reef
Show others...
2019 (English)In: Coral reefs (Print), ISSN 0722-4028, E-ISSN 1432-0975, Vol. 38, no 3, p. 431-441Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Epilithic algae are a ubiquitous component of coral reefs. Components of the epilithic algal matrix (EAM) can have a significant influence on coral settlement and benthic feeding by fishes. We employed a herbivore exclusion experiment on a fringing reef in Viti Levu, Fiji, to investigate the functional role of herbivorous fishes in affecting the EAM between different habitat types and levels of community-based fishing restriction. We surveyed the herbivorous fish community and deployed experimental tiles on the reef flat and lagoonal slope and inside and outside of an area where fishing is restricted (tabu). Tiles were deployed for 3months, half within cages to exclude herbivorous fishes. We then identified algal type and quantified epilithic algal turf height, sediment dry weight, and detritus within the EAM on each tile. EAM that developed under herbivory was remarkably similar, regardless of the differences in habitat or fishing restriction. In contrast, EAM within cages was characterised by longer turf, heavier sediment load, and high variance in turf length and sediment load. Habitat type played a strong role in determining EAM characteristics where herbivores were excluded. Caged EAM on the reef flat was characterised by algal turf and fleshy macroalgae, whereas EAM in cages on the lagoonal slope was overwhelmingly dominated by filamentous and mat-forming cyanobacteria. The results presented here demonstrate the importance of herbivorous fishes in maintaining a benthic environment favourable to coral settlement and survival. Our results suggest that herbivore biomass per se is not a reliable predictor of foraging activity. Moreover, these results show that the absence of herbivore foraging can have different consequences depending on the habitat type, even within the same reef.

Keywords
Herbivory, Algae, Sediment, Anoxia, Herbivore function, LMMA
National Category
Biological Sciences
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:su:diva-170109 (URN)10.1007/s00338-019-01780-1 (DOI)000469356900005 ()
Available from: 2019-07-02 Created: 2019-07-02 Last updated: 2022-02-26Bibliographically approved
Eich, A., Ford, A. K., Nugues, M. M., McAndrews, R. S., Wild, C. & Ferse, S. C. A. (2019). Positive association between epiphytes and competitiveness of the brown algal genus Lobophora against corals. PeerJ, 7, Article ID e6380.
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Positive association between epiphytes and competitiveness of the brown algal genus Lobophora against corals
Show others...
2019 (English)In: PeerJ, E-ISSN 2167-8359, Vol. 7, article id e6380Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Observations of coral-algal competition can provide valuable information about the state of coral reef ecosystems. Here, we report contact rates and apparent competition states for six shallow lagoonal reefs in Fiji. A total of 81.4% of examined coral perimeters were found to be in contact with algae, with turf algae (54.7%) and macroalgae of the genus Lobophora (16.8%) representing the most frequently observed contacts. Turf algae competitiveness was low, with 21.8% of coral-turf contacts being won by the algae (i.e. overgrowth or bleaching of coral tissue). In contrast, Lobophora competitiveness against corals was high, with 62.5% of contacts being won by the alga. The presence of epiphytic algae on Lobophora was associated with significantly greater algal competitiveness against corals, with 75.8% and 21.1% of interactions recorded as algal wins in the presence and absence of epiphytes, respectively. Sedimentation rate, herbivorous fish biomass, and coral colony size did not have a significant effect on Lobophora-coral interactions. This research indicates a novel and important role of epiphytes in driving the outcome of coral-algal contacts.

Keywords
Lobophora, Coral algae competition, Epiphytes, Allelopathy, Turf algae
National Category
Environmental Sciences Ecology
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:su:diva-166535 (URN)10.7717/peerj.6380 (DOI)000458123100006 ()30775176 (PubMedID)
Available from: 2019-03-06 Created: 2019-03-06 Last updated: 2023-08-28Bibliographically approved
Organisations
Identifiers
ORCID iD: ORCID iD iconorcid.org/0000-0002-4971-048x

Search in DiVA

Show all publications