Open this publication in new window or tab >>2022 (English)In: Memini Travaux et Documents, ISSN 1929-221X, Vol. 28Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]
Physical impairment was arguably an all-too-common reality of human life in premodern societies. Because of insufficient health care, the omnipresence of common illnesses without effective cures, and different forms of manual labour being the daily outcome for a vast majority of society, most people presumably encountered impairing injuries and long-lasting illness during their life courses, even if they were born with healthy and normative bodies. The ensuing omnipresence of bodily variety that would come from it suggests that it might have been experienced in other ways in the premodern period compared to today, and that this variety might give interesting insights into experiencing life in the premodernity.
The study of the body has gained increased focus in branches of history aimed at human emotion, sense and experience2. It is largely agreed upon that the body is historically changeable, and that people’s experiences change accordingly3. This gives incentive to study the variety of human bodies within historical communities as well. How one’s body functioned affected how one saw oneself and interacted with other people. Variety in human bodies is therefore crucial to understand experience in any given society.
Two texts from early modern Sweden might serve as examples of how we can encounter the variety of bodies in premodern sources. The first is an undated letter to the Justitiekollegium written sometime during the middle of the 17th century, in which a woman named Ingrid Håkansdotter pleaded for poor relief from the city of Stockholm. She (or someone she had asked for help to write) described her physical ailments in detail. She wrote that her whole body was swollen, which caused severe pain, and that she could not walk without crutches. The pain was so intense that she could not lie down, which meant that she needed to sit upright in bed and therefore had had no rest neither night nor day for five years.
The second example is a foreword to a Swedish devotional book printed in 1601, in which the publisher Petrus Johannis Gothus recounted his physical ailments over a number of pages. According to the foreword, he had been incapacitated from the age of 14, when he fell ill with a plague. This condition worsened during the course of his life, so that he in his mature age was haunted by constant pain and unable to use his right leg. Like the woman of the previous case, he stressed that this had led to chronic lack of sleep and rest, as well as to financial problems.
In this article, I will discuss how we can make sense of these texts as expressions of bodily experiences in premodern times. I will argue that the research field of dis/ability history places focus on important aspects of the body in historical societies, but that inspiration from the history of emotions could add essential insights into how the body was experienced6. Finally, I will suggest that the budding research field of history of experience could provide a framework for analysing the lived experiences of the dis/abled body.
Keywords
Illness, study of the body, history of experience
National Category
History
Research subject
History
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:su:diva-214837 (URN)10.4000/memini.2333 (DOI)
2023-02-142023-02-142023-02-16Bibliographically approved