Change search
Link to record
Permanent link

Direct link
McAllister, Ryan R. J.ORCID iD iconorcid.org/0000-0003-0080-7528
Publications (2 of 2) Show all publications
Friedman, R. S., Guerrero, A. M., McAllister, R. R. J., Rhodes, J. R., Santika, T., Budiharta, S., . . . Wilson, K. A. (2020). Beyond the community in participatory forest management: A governance network perspective. Land use policy, 97, Article ID 104738.
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Beyond the community in participatory forest management: A governance network perspective
Show others...
2020 (English)In: Land use policy, ISSN 0264-8377, E-ISSN 1873-5754, Vol. 97, article id 104738Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Governance of the environment and natural resources involves interests of multiple stakeholders at different scales. In community-based forest management, organisations outside of communities play important roles in achieving multiple social and ecological objectives. How and when these organisations play a role in the community-based forest management process remains a key question. We applied social network analysis to a case study in Indonesian Borneo to better understand the evolution of interactions between organisational actors, and with communities. NGOs featured most prominently in initiating the permit process, implementing management, and providing other support activities, while also being well-connected to donors and government actors. The network configurations indicated significant cooperation among organisations when initiating the community forest process, while bridging between village and organisational levels characterised all stages of the community forest process. While community-based forest management often evokes images of grassroots efforts and broad local capacity to manage forests, reality shows a more dynamic and heterogeneous picture and broader involvement of different actor types and motivations in Indonesia. These findings can be applied to other countries implementing and expanding their decentralised forest policies.

Keywords
Social network analysis, Community-based forest management, Indonesia, Decentralised governance, Forest policy
National Category
Social and Economic Geography
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:su:diva-185305 (URN)10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104738 (DOI)000558748500011 ()
Available from: 2020-10-20 Created: 2020-10-20 Last updated: 2022-02-25Bibliographically approved
Barnes, M. L., Bodin, Ö., Guerrero, A. M., McAllister, R. R. J., Alexander, S. M. & Robins, G. (2017). The social structural foundations of adaptation and transformation in social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 22(4), Article ID 16.
Open this publication in new window or tab >>The social structural foundations of adaptation and transformation in social-ecological systems
Show others...
2017 (English)In: Ecology and Society, E-ISSN 1708-3087, Vol. 22, no 4, article id 16Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Social networks are frequently cited as vital for facilitating successful adaptation and transformation in linked social-ecological systems to overcome pressing resource management challenges. Yet confusion remains over the precise nature of adaptation vs. transformation and the specific social network structures that facilitate these processes. Here, we adopt a network perspective to theorize a continuum of structural capacities in social-ecological systems that set the stage for effective adaptation and transformation. We begin by drawing on the resilience literature and the multilayered action situation to link processes of change in social-ecological systems to decision making across multiple layers of rules underpinning societal organization. We then present a framework that hypothesizes seven specific social-ecological network configurations that lay the structural foundation necessary for facilitating adaptation and transformation, given the type and magnitude of human action required. A key contribution of the framework is explicit consideration of how social networks relate to ecological structures and the particular environmental problem at hand. Of the seven configurations identified, three are linked to capacities conducive to adaptation and three to transformation, and one is hypothesized to be important for facilitating both processes. We discuss how our theoretical framework can be applied in practice by highlighting existing empirical examples from related environmental governance contexts. Further extension of our hypotheses, particularly as more data become available, can ultimately help guide the design of institutional arrangements to be more effective at dealing with change.

Keywords
adaptation, adaptive capacity, social-ecological system, social network, social-ecological network, transformation
National Category
Biological Sciences Social and Economic Geography
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:su:diva-152673 (URN)10.5751/ES-09769-220416 (DOI)000419351000034 ()
Available from: 2018-02-21 Created: 2018-02-21 Last updated: 2024-07-04Bibliographically approved
Identifiers
ORCID iD: ORCID iD iconorcid.org/0000-0003-0080-7528

Search in DiVA

Show all publications