Change search
Link to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Poblador-Plou, BeatrizORCID iD iconorcid.org/0000-0002-5119-5093
Publications (2 of 2) Show all publications
Gimeno-Feliu, L. A., Pastor-Sanz, M., Poblador-Plou, B., Calderón-Larrañaga, A., Díaz, E. & Prados-Torres, A. (2020). Multimorbidity and chronic diseases among undocumented migrants: evidence to contradict the myths. International Journal for Equity in Health, 19(1), Article ID 113.
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Multimorbidity and chronic diseases among undocumented migrants: evidence to contradict the myths
Show others...
2020 (English)In: International Journal for Equity in Health, E-ISSN 1475-9276, Vol. 19, no 1, article id 113Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: There is little verified information on the global health status of undocumented migrants (UMs). Our aim is to compare the prevalence of the main chronic diseases and of multimorbidity in undocumented migrants, documented migrants, and Spanish nationals in a Spanish autonomous community.

Methods: Retrospective observational study of all users of the public health system of the region of Aragon over 1 year (2011): 930,131 Spanish nationals; 123,432 documented migrants (DMs); and 17,152 UMs. Binary logistic regression was performed to examine the association between migrant status (Spanish nationals versus DMs and UMs) and both multimorbidity and individual chronic diseases, adjusting for age and sex.

Results: The prevalence of individual chronic diseases in UMs was lower than in DMs and much lower than in Spanish nationals. Comparison with the corresponding group of Spanish nationals revealed odds ratios (OR) of 0.1-0.3 and 0.3-0.5 for male and female UMs, respectively (p < 0.05 in all cases). The risk of multimorbidity was lower for UMs than DMs, both for men (OR, 0.12; 95%CI 0.11-0.13 versus OR, 0.53; 95%CI 0.51-0.54) and women (OR, 0.18; 95%CI 0.16-0.20 versus OR, 0.74; 95%CI 0.72-0.75).

Conclusions: Analysis of data from a health system that offers universal coverage to all immigrants, irrespective of legal status, reveals that the prevalence of chronic disease and multimorbidity is lower in UMs as compared with both DMs and Spanish nationals. These findings refute previous claims that the morbidity burden in UM populations is higher than that of the native population of the host country.

Keywords
Emigration and immigration, Primary health care, Multimorbidity, Chronic disease, Spain, Health status
National Category
Public Health, Global Health and Social Medicine
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:su:diva-184512 (URN)10.1186/s12939-020-01225-0 (DOI)000549980300002 ()32631325 (PubMedID)
Available from: 2020-09-11 Created: 2020-09-11 Last updated: 2025-02-20Bibliographically approved
Lozano-Hernández, C. M., López-Rodríguez, J. A., Leiva-Fernández, F., Calderón-Larrañaga, A., Barrio-Cortes, J., Gimeno-Feliu, L. A., . . . del Cura-González, I. (2020). Social support, social context and nonadherence to treatment in young senior patients with multimorbidity and polypharmacy followed-up in primary care. MULTIPAP Study. PLOS ONE, 15(6), Article ID e0235148.
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Social support, social context and nonadherence to treatment in young senior patients with multimorbidity and polypharmacy followed-up in primary care. MULTIPAP Study
Show others...
2020 (English)In: PLOS ONE, E-ISSN 1932-6203, Vol. 15, no 6, article id e0235148Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Objective

To estimate the prevalence of nonadherence to treatment and its relationship with social support and social context in patients with multimorbidity and polypharmacy followed-up in primary care.

Methods

This was an observational, descriptive, cross-sectional, multicenter study with an analytical approach. A total of 593 patients between 65–74 years of age with multimorbidity (≥3 diseases) and polypharmacy (≥5 drugs) during the last three months and agreed to participate in the MULTIPAP Study. The main variable was adherence (Morisky-Green). The predictors were social support (structural support and functional support (DUFSS)); sociodemographic variables; indicators of urban objective vulnerability; health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-5L-VAS & QALY); and clinical variables. Descriptive, bivariate and multivariate analyses with logistic regression models and robust estimators were performed.

Results

Four out of ten patients were nonadherent, 47% had not completed primary education, 28.7% had an income ≤1050 €/month, 35% reported four or more IUVs, and the average perceived health-related quality of life (HRQOL) EQ-5D-5L-VAS was 65.5. The items that measure functional support, with significantly different means between nonadherent and adherent patients were receiving love and affection (-0.23; 95%CI: -0.40;-0.06), help when ill (-0.25; 95%CI: -0.42;-0.08), useful advice (-0.20; 95%CI: -0.37;-0.02), social invitations (-0.22; 95%CI:-0.44;-0.01), and recognition (-0.29; 95%CI:-0.50;-0.08). Factors associated with nonadherence were belonging to the medium vs. low tertile of functional support (0.62; 95%CI: 0.42;0.94), reporting less than four IUVs (0.69; 95%CI: 0.46;1.02) and higher HRQOL perception (0.98; 95%CI: 0.98;0.99).

Conclusions

Among patients 65–74 years of age with multimorbidity and polypharmacy, lower functional support was related to nonadherence to treatment. The nonadherence decreased in those patients with higher functional support, lower urban vulnerability and higher perceived health status according to the visual analog scale of health-related quality of life.

National Category
Public Health, Global Health and Social Medicine
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:su:diva-184586 (URN)10.1371/journal.pone.0235148 (DOI)000545646600046 ()32579616 (PubMedID)
Available from: 2020-09-08 Created: 2020-09-08 Last updated: 2025-02-20Bibliographically approved
Identifiers
ORCID iD: ORCID iD iconorcid.org/0000-0002-5119-5093

Search in DiVA

Show all publications