Non-targeted screening with liquid chromatography coupled to high-resolution mass spectrometry (LC/HRMS) is increasingly leveraging in silico methods, including machine learning, to obtain candidate structures for structural annotation of LC/HRMS features and their further prioritization. Candidate structures are commonly retrieved based on the tandem mass spectral information either from spectral or structural databases; however, the vast majority of the detected LC/HRMS features remain unannotated, constituting what we refer to as a part of the unknown chemical space. Recently, the exploration of this chemical space has become accessible through generative models. Furthermore, the evaluation of the candidate structures benefits from the complementary empirical analytical information such as retention time, collision cross section values, and ionization type. In this critical review, we provide an overview of the current approaches for retrieving and prioritizing candidate structures. These approaches come with their own set of advantages and limitations, as we showcase in the example of structural annotation of ten known and ten unknown LC/HRMS features. We emphasize that these limitations stem from both experimental and computational considerations. Finally, we highlight three key considerations for the future development of in silico methods.

Non-target screening with LC/IMS/HRMS is increasingly employed for detecting and identifying the structure of potentially hazardous chemicals in the environment and food. Structural assignment relies on a combination of multidimensional instrumental methods and computational methods. The candidate structures are often isomeric, and unfortunately, assigning the correct structure among a number of isomeric candidate structures still is a key challenge both instrumentally and computationally. While practicing non-target screening, it is usually impossible to evaluate separately the limitations arising from (1) the inability of LC/IMS/HRMS to resolve the isomeric candidate structures and (2) the uncertainty of in silico methods in predicting the analytical information of isomeric candidate structures due to the lack of analytical standards for all candidate structures. Here we evaluate the feasibility of structural assignment of isomeric candidate structures based on in silico–predicted retention time and database collision cross-section (CCS) values as well as based on matching the empirical analytical properties of the detected feature with those of the analytical standards. For this, we investigated 14 candidate structures corresponding to five features detected with LC/HRMS in a spiked surface water sample. Considering the predicted retention times and database CCS values with the accompanying uncertainty, only one of the isomeric candidate structures could be deemed as unlikely; therefore, the annotation of the LC/IMS/HRMS features remained ambiguous. To further investigate if unequivocal annotation is possible via analytical standards, the reversed-phase LC retention times and low- and high-resolution ion mobility spectrometry separation, as well as high-resolution MS² spectra of analytical standards were studied. Reversed-phase LC separated the highest number of candidate structures while low-resolution ion mobility and high-resolution MS² spectra provided little means for pinpointing the correct structure among the isomeric candidate structures even if analytical standards were available for comparison. Furthermore, the question arises which prediction accuracy is required from the in silico methods to par the analytical separation. Based on the experimental data of the isomeric candidate structures studied here and previously published in the literature (516 retention time and 569 CCS values), we estimate that to reduce the candidate list by 95% of the structures, the confidence interval of the predicted retention times would need to decrease to below 0.05 min for a 15-min gradient while that of CCS values would need to decrease to 0.15%. Hereby, we set a clear goal to the in silico methods for retention time and CCS prediction.

Recently, nitrogen-doped porous carbon materials containing non-precious metals (termed “M-N-C”) have formed a group of functional materials to replace precious metal-based catalysts for electrochemical CO₂ reduction reaction. Here, a series of mesoporous Ni-N-C electrocatalysts (termed “mp-Ni-N-Cs”) were prepared via a gel-template method, and could effectively reduce CO₂ into CO in a flow cell. The result in gas sorption tests exhibited a typical mesoporous structure, which would bring both sufficient exposed active sites and convenient mass transfer channels. Electrochemical tests showed excellent performance at an applied potential of -1.3 V (vs. RHE), e.g., a CO Faradaic efficiency (FE_CO) of 95.85 %, and a CO reduction current (jCO) of -21.29 mA cm⁻². Significantly, its FE_CO exceeded 93 % in a wide range of potentials from -1.0 to -1.5 V, showing great tolerance to fluctuation in potential. The mp-Ni-N-C electrocatalysts have satisfactory features in terms of catalytic activity, facile preparation, and economic feasibility, and will offer a valuable reference for next exploration of cost-effective electrocatalysts for CO₂ conversion.

To achieve water quality objectives of the zero pollution action plan in Europe, rapid methods are needed to identify the presence of toxic substances in complex water samples. However, only a small fraction of chemicals detected with nontarget high-resolution mass spectrometry can be identified, and fewer have ecotoxicological data available. We hypothesized that ecotoxicological data could be predicted for unknown molecular features in data-rich high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) spectra, thereby circumventing time-consuming steps of molecular identification and rapidly flagging molecules of potentially high toxicity in complex samples. Here, we present MS2Tox, a machine learning method, to predict the toxicity of unidentified chemicals based on high-resolution accurate mass tandem mass spectra (MS2). The MS2Tox model for fish toxicity was trained and tested on 647 lethal concentration (LC50) values from the CompTox database and validated for 219 chemicals and 420 MS2 spectra from MassBank. The root mean square error (RMSE) of MS2Tox predictions was below 0.89 log-mM, while the experimental repeatability of LC50 values in CompTox was 0.44 log-mM. MS2Tox allowed accurate prediction of fish LC50 values for 22 chemicals detected in water samples, and empirical evidence suggested the right directionality for another 68 chemicals. Moreover, by incorporating structural information, e.g., the presence of carbonyl-benzene, amide moieties, or hydroxyl groups, MS2Tox outperforms baseline models that use only the exact mass or logKOW.