Change search
Link to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Publications (10 of 153) Show all publications
Rosignoli, S., Taraglio, S., Di Luzio, F., Lustrino, E., Marzella, D., Elofsson, A., . . . Paiardini, A. (2026). A deep learning framework for comprehensive prediction of human RNA G-quadruplex-binding proteins. Bioinformatics, 42(3), Article ID btag088.
Open this publication in new window or tab >>A deep learning framework for comprehensive prediction of human RNA G-quadruplex-binding proteins
Show others...
2026 (English)In: Bioinformatics, ISSN 1367-4803, E-ISSN 1367-4811, Vol. 42, no 3, article id btag088Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

G-quadruplex-binding proteins (G4BPs) play key roles in RNA metabolism and stress response, yet their identification remains experimentally challenging. Here, we present a deep learning (DL) framework for the prediction of RNA G4BPs (RG4BPs), integrating diverse encoding strategies and neural architectures. Our best-performing model, which includes ESM-2 protein language model embeddings and consists of an LSTM architecture, achieved 86% accuracy in distinguishing RG4BPs from non-binder proteins. The application of this model to the human proteome uncovered 2160 high-confidence RG4BP candidates, many of which display intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) and enrichment in stress granule organelles. These findings reveal a potential link between G-quadruplex recognition and cellular stress responses. To enable easy and broad access to the framework, we developed G4REP, a web server for RG4BP prediction and analysis. Overall, an effective approach to explore the RG4BPs landscape and uncover novel players in RNA regulation is provided.

National Category
Bioinformatics (Computational Biology) Bioinformatics and Computational Biology
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:su:diva-253873 (URN)10.1093/bioinformatics/btag088 (DOI)001708082200001 ()41712756 (PubMedID)2-s2.0-105032391526 (Scopus ID)
Available from: 2026-04-22 Created: 2026-04-22 Last updated: 2026-04-22Bibliographically approved
Elofsson, A. (2026). AlphaFold3 at CASP16. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, 94(1), 154-166
Open this publication in new window or tab >>AlphaFold3 at CASP16
2026 (English)In: Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, ISSN 0887-3585, E-ISSN 1097-0134, Vol. 94, no 1, p. 154-166Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The CASP16 experiment provided the first opportunity to benchmark AlphaFold3. In contrast to AlphaFold2, AlphaFold3 can predict the structure of non-protein molecules. According to the benchmark presented by the developers, it is expected to perform slightly better than AlphaFold2 for proteins. In this study, we assess the performance of AlphaFold3 using both automatic server submissions (AF3-server) and manual predictions from the Elofsson group (Elofsson). All predictions were generated via the AlphaFold3 web server, with manual interventions applied to large targets and ligands. Compared to AlphaFold2-based methods, we found that AlphaFold3 performs slightly better for protein complexes. However, when massive sampling is applied to AlphaFold2, the difference disappears. It was also noted that, according to the official ranking from CASP, the AF3-server performs better than AlphaFold2 for easier targets, but not for harder targets. Furthermore, the performance of the AF3-server is comparable to the best methods when considering the top-ranked predictions, but slightly behind when examining the best among the five submitted models. Here, there exist targets where AF3-server, the top-ranked method, is worse than lower-ranked models, indicating that a venue for progress could be to develop better strategies for identifying the best out of the generated models. When using AF3-server to predict the stoichiometry of larger protein complexes, the accuracy is limited, especially for heteromeric targets. When analyzing the predictions including nucleic acids, it was found that, in general, the accuracy is relatively low. However, the AF3-server performance was not far behind that of the top-ranked method. In summary, AF3-server offers a user-friendly tool that provides predictions comparable to state-of-the-art methods in all categories of CASP.

Keywords
AlphaFold, CASP, protein structure predictions, RNA structure prediction
National Category
Bioinformatics and Computational Biology
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:su:diva-246970 (URN)10.1002/prot.70044 (DOI)001555439700001 ()40851426 (PubMedID)2-s2.0-105014010456 (Scopus ID)
Available from: 2025-09-16 Created: 2025-09-16 Last updated: 2026-03-19Bibliographically approved
Elofsson, A., Kretsch, R. C., Magnus, M. & Montelione, G. T. (2026). Engaging the Community: CASP Special Interest Groups. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, 94(1), 432-434
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Engaging the Community: CASP Special Interest Groups
2026 (English)In: Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, ISSN 0887-3585, E-ISSN 1097-0134, Vol. 94, no 1, p. 432-434Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The Critical Assessment of Structure Prediction (CASP) brings together a diverse group of scientists, from deep learning experts to NMR specialists, all aimed at developing accurate prediction algorithms that can effectively characterize the structural aspects of biomolecules relevant to their functions. Engagement within the CASP community has traditionally been limited to the prediction season and the conference, with limited discourse in the 1.5 years between CASP seasons. CASP special interest groups (SIGs) were established in 2023 to encourage continuous dialogue within the community. The online seminar series has drawn global participation from across disciplines and career stages. This has facilitated cross-disciplinary discussions fostering collaborations. The archives of these seminars have become a vital learning tool for newcomers to the field, lowering the barrier to entry.

Keywords
blind challenges, collaboration, community engagement, online community, open science, scientific exchange, structure prediction, webinar series
National Category
Biochemistry
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:su:diva-243439 (URN)10.1002/prot.26833 (DOI)001478774000001 ()40304050 (PubMedID)2-s2.0-105004192782 (Scopus ID)
Available from: 2025-05-26 Created: 2025-05-26 Last updated: 2026-03-20Bibliographically approved
Fromm, S., Ludaic, M. & Elofsson, A. (2026). Evaluating deep learning based structure prediction methods on antibody–antigen complexes. Bioinformatics, 42(4), Article ID btag136.
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Evaluating deep learning based structure prediction methods on antibody–antigen complexes
2026 (English)In: Bioinformatics, ISSN 1367-4803, E-ISSN 1367-4811, Vol. 42, no 4, article id btag136Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Motivation: AlphaFold2 significantly improved the prediction of protein complex structures. However, its accuracy is lower for interactions without coevolutionary signals, such as host–pathogen and antibody–antigen interactions. Two strategies have been developed to address this limitation: massive sampling and replacing the evoformer with the pairformer, which does not rely on coevolution, as introduced in AlphaFold3, thereby enabling more structural reasoning by the network.

Results: In this study, we benchmark structure prediction methods on unseen antibody–antigen complexes. We found that increased sampling improves the chances of generating a correct protein model, roughly in a log-linear manner. However, the internal quality estimates by AlphaFold often cannot identify the best predicted structures for each target, resulting in a significant loss of performance for the top-ranked protein model compared with the best model. For all methods, a significant challenge remains the identification of the best model. We also show that AlphaFold3 outperforms AlphaFold2, Boltz-1, and Chai-1. Furthermore, AlphaFold3 performance declines significantly for complexes that lack structural similarity to the training set, indicating that it has to some extent learned to detect remote structural similarities.

Availability and implementation: All code is available from github.com/samuelfromm/abag-benchmark-set/ and all data from DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17978681. The latter repository also contains the code.

National Category
Bioinformatics (Computational Biology)
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:su:diva-254524 (URN)10.1093/bioinformatics/btag136 (DOI)001736660100001 ()41863324 (PubMedID)2-s2.0-105035306566 (Scopus ID)
Available from: 2026-05-05 Created: 2026-05-05 Last updated: 2026-05-05Bibliographically approved
Elofsson, A. & Kolodny, R. (2025). Editorial overview: Sequences and topology (2025). Current opinion in structural biology, 93, Article ID 103108.
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Editorial overview: Sequences and topology (2025)
2025 (English)In: Current opinion in structural biology, ISSN 0959-440X, E-ISSN 1879-033X, Vol. 93, article id 103108Article in journal, Editorial material (Other academic) Published
National Category
Molecular Biology Bioinformatics and Computational Biology
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:su:diva-245669 (URN)10.1016/j.sbi.2025.103108 (DOI)001524354700001 ()2-s2.0-105009474838 (Scopus ID)
Available from: 2025-08-21 Created: 2025-08-21 Last updated: 2025-08-21Bibliographically approved
Zhou, W., Sprague, C. I., Viliuga, V., Tadiello, M., Elofsson, A. & Azizpour, H. (2025). Energy-Based Flow Matching for Generating 3D Molecular Structure. In: Aarti Singh; Maryam Fazel; Daniel Hsu; Simon Lacoste-Julien; Felix Berkenkamp; Tegan Maharaj; Kiri Wagstaff; Jerry Zhu (Ed.), International Conference on Machine Learning, 13-19 July 2025, Vancouver Convention Center, Vancouver, Canada: . Paper presented at Forty-Second International Conference on Machine Learning, Vancouver (ICML 2025), Canada, 13-19 July, 2025 (pp. 79168-79191). ML Research Press
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Energy-Based Flow Matching for Generating 3D Molecular Structure
Show others...
2025 (English)In: International Conference on Machine Learning, 13-19 July 2025, Vancouver Convention Center, Vancouver, Canada / [ed] Aarti Singh; Maryam Fazel; Daniel Hsu; Simon Lacoste-Julien; Felix Berkenkamp; Tegan Maharaj; Kiri Wagstaff; Jerry Zhu, ML Research Press , 2025, p. 79168-79191Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

Molecular structure generation is a fundamental problem that involves determining the 3D positions of molecules’ constituents. It has crucial biological applications, such as molecular docking, protein folding, and molecular design. Recent advances in generative modeling, such as diffusion models and flow matching, have made great progress on these tasks by modeling molecular conformations as a distribution. In this work, we focus on flow matching and adopt an energy-based perspective to improve training and inference of structure generation models. Our view results in a mapping function, represented by a deep network, that is directly learned to iteratively map random configurations, i.e. samples from the source distribution, to target structures, i.e. points in the data manifold. This yields a conceptually simple and empirically effective flow matching setup that is theoretically justified and has interesting connections to fundamental properties such as idempotency and stability, as well as the empirically useful techniques such as structure refinement in AlphaFold. Experiments on protein docking as well as protein backbone generation consistently demonstrate the method’s effectiveness, where it outperforms recent baselines of task-associated flow matching and diffusion models, using a similar computational budget.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
ML Research Press, 2025
Series
Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, E-ISSN 2640-3498 ; 267
National Category
Bioinformatics (Computational Biology)
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:su:diva-251221 (URN)2-s2.0-105023513160 (Scopus ID)
Conference
Forty-Second International Conference on Machine Learning, Vancouver (ICML 2025), Canada, 13-19 July, 2025
Available from: 2026-01-16 Created: 2026-01-16 Last updated: 2026-01-16Bibliographically approved
Zhou, W., Sprague, C. I., Viliuga, V., Tadiello, M., Elofsson, A. & Azizpour, H. (2025). Energy-Based Flow Matching for Generating 3D Molecular Structure. In: Aarti Singh; Maryam Fazel; Daniel Hsu; Simon Lacoste-Julien; Felix Berkenkamp; Tegan Maharaj; Kiri Wagstaff; Jerry Zhu (Ed.), Proceedings of the 42nd International Conference on Machine Learning: . Paper presented at 42nd International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML 2025), Vancouver, Canada, July 13-19, 2025 (pp. 79168-79191). ML Research Press
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Energy-Based Flow Matching for Generating 3D Molecular Structure
Show others...
2025 (English)In: Proceedings of the 42nd International Conference on Machine Learning / [ed] Aarti Singh; Maryam Fazel; Daniel Hsu; Simon Lacoste-Julien; Felix Berkenkamp; Tegan Maharaj; Kiri Wagstaff; Jerry Zhu, ML Research Press , 2025, p. 79168-79191Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

Molecular structure generation is a fundamental problem that involves determining the 3D positions of molecules’ constituents. It has crucial biological applications, such as molecular docking, protein folding, and molecular design. Recent advances in generative modeling, such as diffusion models and flow matching, have made great progress on these tasks by modeling molecular conformations as a distribution. In this work, we focus on flow matching and adopt an energy-based perspective to improve training and inference of structure generation models. Our view results in a mapping function, represented by a deep network, that is directly learned to iteratively map random configurations, i.e. samples from the source distribution, to target structures, i.e. points in the data manifold. This yields a conceptually simple and empirically effective flow matching setup that is theoretically justified and has interesting connections to fundamental properties such as idempotency and stability, as well as the empirically useful techniques such as structure refinement in AlphaFold. Experiments on protein docking as well as protein backbone generation consistently demonstrate the method’s effectiveness, where it outperforms recent baselines of task-associated flow matching and diffusion models, using a similar computational budget.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
ML Research Press, 2025
Series
Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, ISSN 2640-3498 ; 267
National Category
Bioinformatics (Computational Biology)
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:su:diva-251915 (URN)2-s2.0-105023513160 (Scopus ID)
Conference
42nd International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML 2025), Vancouver, Canada, July 13-19, 2025
Available from: 2026-01-29 Created: 2026-01-29 Last updated: 2026-01-29Bibliographically approved
Viliuga, V., Seute, L., Wolf, N., Wagner, S., Elofsson, A., Stühmer, J. & Gräter, F. (2025). Flexibility-conditioned protein structure design with flow matching. In: Aarti Singh; Maryam Fazel; Daniel Hsu; Simon Lacoste-Julien; Felix Berkenkamp; Tegan Maharaj; Kiri Wagstaff; Jerry Zhu (Ed.), International Conference on Machine Learning, 13-19 July 2025, Vancouver Convention Center, Vancouver, Canada: . Paper presented at Forty-Second International Conference on Machine Learning, Vancouver (ICML 2025), Canada, 13-19 July, 2025 (pp. 61513-61533). ML Research Press
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Flexibility-conditioned protein structure design with flow matching
Show others...
2025 (English)In: International Conference on Machine Learning, 13-19 July 2025, Vancouver Convention Center, Vancouver, Canada / [ed] Aarti Singh; Maryam Fazel; Daniel Hsu; Simon Lacoste-Julien; Felix Berkenkamp; Tegan Maharaj; Kiri Wagstaff; Jerry Zhu, ML Research Press , 2025, p. 61513-61533Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

Recent advances in geometric deep learning and generative modeling have enabled the design of novel proteins with a wide range of desired properties. However, current state-of-the-art approaches are typically restricted to generating proteins with only static target properties, such as motifs and symmetries. In this work, we take a step towards overcoming this limitation by proposing a framework to condition structure generation on flexibility, which is crucial for key functionalities such as catalysis or molecular recognition. We first introduce BackFlip, an equivariant neural network for predicting per-residue flexibility from an input backbone structure. Relying on BackFlip, we propose FliPS, an SE(3)-equivariant conditional flow matching model that solves the inverse problem, that is, generating backbones that display a target flexibility profile. In our experiments, we show that FliPS is able to generate novel and diverse protein backbones with the desired flexibility, verified by Molecular Dynamics (MD) simulations. FliPS and BackFlip are available at https://github.com/graeter-group/flips.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
ML Research Press, 2025
Series
Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, E-ISSN 2640-3498 ; 267
National Category
Bioinformatics (Computational Biology)
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:su:diva-251226 (URN)2-s2.0-105023833567 (Scopus ID)
Conference
Forty-Second International Conference on Machine Learning, Vancouver (ICML 2025), Canada, 13-19 July, 2025
Available from: 2026-01-15 Created: 2026-01-15 Last updated: 2026-01-15Bibliographically approved
Viliuga, V., Seute, L., Wolf, N., Wagner, S., Elofsson, A., Stühmer, J. & Gräter, F. (2025). Flexibility-conditioned protein structure design with flow matching. In: Aarti Singh; Maryam Fazel; Daniel Hsu; Simon Lacoste-Julien; Felix Berkenkamp; Tegan Maharaj; Kiri Wagstaff; Jerry Zhu (Ed.), Proceedings of the 42nd International Conference on Machine Learning: . Paper presented at 42nd International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML 2025), Vancouver, Canada, July 13-19, 2025 (pp. 61513-61533). ML Research Press
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Flexibility-conditioned protein structure design with flow matching
Show others...
2025 (English)In: Proceedings of the 42nd International Conference on Machine Learning / [ed] Aarti Singh; Maryam Fazel; Daniel Hsu; Simon Lacoste-Julien; Felix Berkenkamp; Tegan Maharaj; Kiri Wagstaff; Jerry Zhu, ML Research Press , 2025, p. 61513-61533Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

Recent advances in geometric deep learning and generative modeling have enabled the design of novel proteins with a wide range of desired properties. However, current state-of-the-art approaches are typically restricted to generating proteins with only static target properties, such as motifs and symmetries. In this work, we take a step towards overcoming this limitation by proposing a framework to condition structure generation on flexibility, which is crucial for key functionalities such as catalysis or molecular recognition. We first introduce BackFlip, an equivariant neural network for predicting per-residue flexibility from an input backbone structure. Relying on BackFlip, we propose FliPS, an SE(3)-equivariant conditional flow matching model that solves the inverse problem, that is, generating backbones that display a target flexibility profile. In our experiments, we show that FliPS is able to generate novel and diverse protein backbones with the desired flexibility, verified by Molecular Dynamics (MD) simulations. FliPS and BackFlip are available at https://github.com/graeter-group/flips.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
ML Research Press, 2025
Series
Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, ISSN 2640-3498 ; 267
National Category
Bioinformatics (Computational Biology) Artificial Intelligence
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:su:diva-251929 (URN)2-s2.0-105023833567 (Scopus ID)
Conference
42nd International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML 2025), Vancouver, Canada, July 13-19, 2025
Available from: 2026-01-29 Created: 2026-01-29 Last updated: 2026-01-29Bibliographically approved
Osterholz, H., Stevens, A., Abramsson, M. L., Lama, D., Brackmann, K., Rising, A., . . . Landreh, M. (2025). Native Mass Spectrometry Captures the Conformational Plasticity of Proteins with Low-Complexity Domains. JACS Au, 5(1), 281-290
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Native Mass Spectrometry Captures the Conformational Plasticity of Proteins with Low-Complexity Domains
Show others...
2025 (English)In: JACS Au, E-ISSN 2691-3704, Vol. 5, no 1, p. 281-290Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Disordered regions are an important functional feature of many multidomain proteins. A prime example is proteins in membraneless organelles, which contain folded domains that engage in specific interactions and disordered low-complexity (LC) domains that mediate liquid-liquid phase separation. Studying these complex architectures remains challenging due to their conformational variability. Native mass spectrometry (nMS) is routinely employed to analyze conformations and interactions of folded or disordered proteins; however, its ability to analyze proteins with disordered LC domains has not been investigated. Here, we analyze the ionization and conformational states of designed model proteins that recapitulate key features of proteins found in membraneless organelles. Our results show that charge state distributions (CSDs) in nMS reflect partial disorder regardless of the protein sequence, providing insights into their conformational plasticity and interactions. By applying the same CSD analysis to a spider silk protein fragment, we find that interactions between folded domains that trigger silk assembly simultaneously induce conformational changes in the LC domains. Lastly, using intact nucleosomes, we demonstrate that CSDs are a good predictor for the disorder content of complex native assemblies. We conclude that nMS reliably informs about the conformational landscape of proteins with LC domains, which is crucial for understanding protein condensates in cellular environments.

Keywords
electrospray ionization, intrinsic disorder, liquid−liquid phase separation, protein engineering
National Category
Biophysics
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:su:diva-239969 (URN)10.1021/jacsau.4c00961 (DOI)001392166000001 ()2-s2.0-85214338339 (Scopus ID)
Available from: 2025-02-28 Created: 2025-02-28 Last updated: 2025-02-28Bibliographically approved
Organisations
Identifiers
ORCID iD: ORCID iD iconorcid.org/0000-0002-7115-9751

Search in DiVA

Show all publications