Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Neural suppression in odor recognition memory
Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Psychology, Perception and psychophysics.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3418-0700
Show others and affiliations
Number of Authors: 52023 (English)In: Chemical Senses, ISSN 0379-864X, E-ISSN 1464-3553, Vol. 48, article id bjad001Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Little is known about the neural basis of lower- and higher-order olfactory functions such as odor memory, compared with other sensory systems. The aim of this study was to explore neural networks and correlates associated with 3 functions: passive smelling (PS), odor encoding (OE), and in particular odor recognition memory (ORM). Twenty-six healthy participants were examined using functional magnetic resonance imaging conducted across 3 sessions, one for each function. Independent component analysis revealed a difference between sessions where a distinct ORM component incorporating hippocampus and posterior cingulate showed delayed triggering dissociated from odor stimulation and recognition. By contrasting Hit for ORM (target odors correctly recognized as old) and a combination of PS and detected odors from OE, we found significantly lower activations in amygdala, piriform cortex, insula, thalamus, and the inferior parietal lobule. Region of interest analysis including anterior insula, posterior cingulate gyrus, dentate gyrus, left middle frontal gyrus, amygdala, and piriform cortex demonstrated that Hit were associated with lower activations compared with other memory responses. In summary, our findings suggest that successful recognition of familiar odors (odor familiarity) is associated with neural suppression in the abovementioned regions of interest. Additionally, network including the hippocampus and posterior cingulate is engaged in a postrecognition process. This process may be related to incidental encoding of less familiar and more novel odors (odor novelty) and should be subject for future research.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Oxford University Press, 2023. Vol. 48, article id bjad001
Keywords [en]
episodic memory, olfaction, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), independent component analysis (ICA), region of interest analysis (ROI), familiarity
National Category
Neurosciences Psychology
Research subject
Psychology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-216003DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjad001ISI: 000935468800001PubMedID: 36715106Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85148678888OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-216003DiVA, id: diva2:1747846
Note

The study was supported by Linköping University Hospital Research Fund grant number RÖ-938229, Forskningsrådet i Sydöstra Sverige grant number FORSS-931891.

Available from: 2023-03-31 Created: 2023-03-31 Last updated: 2024-01-11Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Larsson, Maria

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Lundin, FredrikLarsson, MariaHamilton, Paul
By organisation
Perception and psychophysics
In the same journal
Chemical Senses
NeurosciencesPsychology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 108 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf