Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Does practice make perfect? The effects of an eight-week manualized deliberate practice course with peer feedback on patient-rated working alliance in adults: A pilot randomized controlled trial
Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Psychology.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0720-8130
Show others and affiliations
Number of Authors: 52024 (English)In: Clinical Psychology in Europe, E-ISSN 2625-3410, Vol. 6, no 3, article id e12353Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: Deliberate Practice (DP), which underscores the importance of expert mentorship, personalized learning objectives, feedback, and repetition, has been suggested as a method to enhance the effectiveness of therapists.

Method: The study tested the efficacy of an eight-week, structured, group-based online course, enriched with peer feedback, for 37 Cognitive Behavioral Therapists. The goal was to assess whether this intervention could boost the quality of therapist-patient alliances, as compared to a control group. To measure this, therapists had their patients anonymously fill out the Session Alliance Inventory both before and after the course. The trial encompassed 120 patient alliance ratings at baseline and 64 at the post-course measurement. The DP course was comprised of a 75-minute remote video workshop each week for eight weeks, supplemented by related study materials. Each workshop focused on a specific skill, such as responding to client resistance, and included 55 minutes of concentrated role-play activities, providing ample opportunities for repetition and feedback.

Results: Using a linear mixed model we did not find an effect on patient alliance ratings. However, we observed a trend (p = .054) indicating that the DP group decreased their alliance ratings (Cohen’s d = -0.40), while the control group demonstrated an increase in their scores (d = 0.49).

Conclusion: This pilot study did not find support for DP leading to better patient-rated alliance compared to a waitlist control. However, the study had several methodological limitations. Further and more rigorous investigation of the effects of DP on patient outcomes is recommended.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2024. Vol. 6, no 3, article id e12353
Keywords [en]
deliberate practice, working alliance, cognitive behavioural therapy, professional development, psychotherapy outcomes, therapist effects
National Category
Psychology
Research subject
Psychology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-234023DOI: 10.32872/cpe.12353ISI: 001336358900002Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85206175444OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-234023DiVA, id: diva2:1903221
Available from: 2024-10-03 Created: 2024-10-03 Last updated: 2024-11-12Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Carlbring, Per

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Lagerberg, HåkanBoswell, James F.Constantino, Michael J.Andersson, GerhardCarlbring, Per
By organisation
Department of PsychologyClinical psychology
In the same journal
Clinical Psychology in Europe
Psychology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 50 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf