Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Disease or function? What matters most for self-rated health in older people depends on age
Stockholms universitet, Samhällsvetenskapliga fakulteten, Centrum för forskning om äldre och åldrande (ARC), (tills m KI).
Stockholms universitet, Samhällsvetenskapliga fakulteten, Centrum för forskning om äldre och åldrande (ARC), (tills m KI). Catholic University of Rome, Italy; Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli, Italy.
Stockholms universitet, Samhällsvetenskapliga fakulteten, Centrum för forskning om äldre och åldrande (ARC), (tills m KI). Stockholm Gerontology Research Center, Sweden.
Stockholms universitet, Samhällsvetenskapliga fakulteten, Centrum för forskning om äldre och åldrande (ARC), (tills m KI).
Rekke forfattare: 42020 (engelsk)Inngår i: Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, ISSN 1594-0667, E-ISSN 1720-8319, Vol. 32, s. 1591-1594Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

Background Self-rated health (SRH) holistically captures older adults' health status from the perspective of the individual.

Aims To explore the accuracy of five objective health indicators related to diseases, physical function, cognition and disability in discriminating SRH among the youngest and oldest old.

Methods We used baseline data from 2196 participants of the Swedish National Study on Aging and Care in Kungsholmen (SNAC-K), Sweden (years 2001-2004). Area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROC) were obtained from logistic regressions adjusted by sex, age and education.

Results Among the youngest old, having >= 4 chronic diseases showed the highest discriminatory capacity of poor versus good SRH (AUROC: 0.714). Among the oldest old, a walking speed < 1.0 m/s showed the highest discriminatory capacity of poor versus good SRH (AUROC: 0.683), followed by >= 1 limitations in IADL (AUROC: 0.664).

Conclusion What matters most for SRH in older people depends on age, with walking speed playing a major role among the oldest old.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
2020. Vol. 32, s. 1591-1594
Emneord [en]
Self-rated health, Chronic diseases, Functioning, Disability, Older adults
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-180603DOI: 10.1007/s40520-020-01507-1ISI: 000518246100002PubMedID: 32130715OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-180603DiVA, id: diva2:1425482
Tilgjengelig fra: 2020-04-21 Laget: 2020-04-21 Sist oppdatert: 2025-02-20bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler i DiVA

Andre lenker

Forlagets fulltekstPubMed
Av organisasjonen
I samme tidsskrift
Aging Clinical and Experimental Research

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Totalt: 44 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf