Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Social resilience of tropical forest ecosystems: A systematic review of core principles and their application
Vise andre og tillknytning
Rekke forfattare: 72025 (engelsk)Inngår i: Journal of Environmental Management, ISSN 0301-4797, E-ISSN 1095-8630, Vol. 394, artikkel-id 127319Artikkel, forskningsoversikt (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

Tropical forest systems (TFSs), play a crucial role in maintaining the planet's ecological balance, supporting life on Earth, and providing different ecosystem services, which are vulnerable to environmental (e.g., severe droughts) and human-induced disturbances (e.g., deforestation).The resilience concept is usually considered in evaluating a forest system under these severe disturbances. However, while resilience evaluations have mainly focused on engineering and ecological perspectives, the integration of social core resilience principles (3SRPs)- learning and experimentation (P5), participation (P6), and polycentric governance (P7)- remains limited. This study performs a systematic review of papers published between 2000 and 2024, focusing on social resilience in tropical forest systems to assess the application of the 3SRPs, following the (PRISMA) framework for systematic reviews, and identify the research gaps in social-based resilience studies. The keywords “resilience”, “forest”, and “ecosystem services” were searched in the “Web of Science” and “Scopus” databases from 2000 to 2024. The 24-year timeframe captures the evolution of resilience theory from early ecological foundations to contemporary social-ecological applications. The results show that despite the recognition of social aspects in selected studies (49), 55% of studies have considered one social principle, 12% studies taken two principles into account (i.e., P6 and P7), and only 8% of reviewed studies have incorporated all three social principles together in their assessments. Social aspects such as stakeholders' participation and governance are often overlooked, with the majority of evaluations focusing on ecological criteria. There is a crucial need for an integrated approach that considers social and ecological criteria to assess forest resilience, with an emphasis on the effective application of 3SRPs.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
2025. Vol. 394, artikkel-id 127319
Emneord [en]
Governance, Learning and experimentation, Participation, Principles, Resilience, Social aspects
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-247870DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.127319ISI: 001579222800004Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105016462550OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-247870DiVA, id: diva2:2004636
Tilgjengelig fra: 2025-10-08 Laget: 2025-10-08 Sist oppdatert: 2025-10-08bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler i DiVA

Andre lenker

Forlagets fulltekstScopus

Person

Wang-Erlandsson, Lan

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Wang-Erlandsson, Lan
Av organisasjonen
I samme tidsskrift
Journal of Environmental Management

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric

doi
urn-nbn
Totalt: 95 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf