Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Are IMRT treatments in the head and neck region increasing the risk of secondary cancers?
Stockholms universitet, Naturvetenskapliga fakulteten, Fysikum. Linköping University, Sweden; Karolinska Institutet, Sweden.
2014 (engelsk)Inngår i: Acta Oncologica, ISSN 0284-186X, E-ISSN 1651-226X, Vol. 53, nr 8, s. 1041-1047Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

Background. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) has been increasingly employed for treating head and neck (H&N) tumours due to its ability to produce isodoses suitable for the complex anatomy of the region. The aim of this study was to assess possible differences between IMRT and conformal radiation therapy (CRT) with regard to risk of radiation-induced secondary malignancies for H&N tumours. Material and methods. IMRT and CRT plans were made for 10 H&N adult patients and the resulting treatment planning data were used to calculate the risk of radiation-induced malignancies in four different tissues. Three risk models with biologically relevant parameters were used for calculations. The influence of scatter radiation and repeated imaging sessions has also been investigated. Results. The results showed that the total lifetime risks of developing radiation-induced secondary malignancies from the two treatment techniques, CRT and IMRT, were comparable and in the interval 0.9-2.5%. The risk contributions from the primary beam and scatter radiation were comparable, whereas the contribution from repeated diagnostic imaging was considerably smaller. Conclusion. The results indicated that the redistribution of the dose characteristic to IMRT leads to a redistribution of the risks in individual tissues. However, the total levels of risk were similar between the two irradiation techniques considered.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
2014. Vol. 53, nr 8, s. 1041-1047
HSV kategori
Forskningsprogram
medicinsk strålningsfysik
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-107626DOI: 10.3109/0284186X.2014.925581ISI: 000340892900008PubMedID: 24983652Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84906544331OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-107626DiVA, id: diva2:748985
Merknad

AuthorCount:3;

Tilgjengelig fra: 2014-09-22 Laget: 2014-09-22 Sist oppdatert: 2022-10-10bibliografisk kontrollert
Inngår i avhandling
1. Out-of-field doses from proton therapy and doses from CBCT imaging: Risk of radiation-induced second cancer from modern radiotherapy
Åpne denne publikasjonen i ny fane eller vindu >>Out-of-field doses from proton therapy and doses from CBCT imaging: Risk of radiation-induced second cancer from modern radiotherapy
2018 (engelsk)Doktoravhandling, med artikler (Annet vitenskapelig)
Abstract [en]

The use of ionizing radiation for treatment of cancer diseases is continuously increasing as patient survival is improving and new treatment techniques are emerging. While this development is beneficial for curing primary tumors, concerns have been raised regarding the unwanted dose contribution to healthy tissues of patients and the associated risk of radiation-induced second cancer (RISC). This is especially important for younger patients receiving radiotherapy more often than before and for whom the risk of developing RISC is elevated in comparison to the typical adult radiotherapy patient. In order to estimate the risk of RISC associated with modern radiotherapy and imaging, the associated radiation doses must be determined.

Patients undergoing radiotherapy receive in-field doses from the primary beam but also out-of-field doses originating from secondary radiation produced in the beamline and within the patient. Over the last years, the use of proton pencil beam scanning (PBS) therapy has rapidly increased due to its potential to reduce the in-field doses to healthy tissues in comparison to photon therapy. One of the drawbacks with proton therapy is the production of neutrons capable of travelling large distances and depositing out-of-field doses to organs located far from the primary treatment field. The dose reduction associated with proton PBS therapy could consequently be affected by the out-of-field doses originating from secondary radiation.

The sharp dose gradients associated with modern treatment techniques, such as photon intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and proton PBS therapy require more frequent and accurate patient imaging in comparison to conventional treatment techniques such as three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (CRT). Setup verification images could be acquired with cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) producing three-dimensional patient images at the cost of an increased patient dose in comparison to planar x-ray imaging. Concerns have been raised regarding the cumulative patient doses from repeated CBCT imaging versus the dose-saving benefits associated with modern radiotherapy techniques like IMRT and proton PBS.

In this thesis, a study on the in-field and out-of-field doses to healthy tissues from photon IMRT and CRT treatments of head and neck tumors showed that the risk of RISC was unaffected by the employed treatment technique and indicated that the lifetime risk of cancer induction was of the order of 1-2%.

Results from measurements and Monte Carlo simulations showed that the out-of-field absorbed doses and equivalent doses associated with proton PBS treatments of brain tumors were up to 60 µGy/Gy and 150 µSv/Gy, respectively. The risk of RISC associated with these out-of-field doses was in the range of approximately one induced cancer in ten thousand treated patients. A simulation study on the doses from a proton gantry-mounted CBCT system showed that repeated CBCT imaging could result in cumulative organ doses of almost 2 Gy. The conclusion from these studies is that the dose-sparing effects of proton PBS therapy are not overshadowed by the out-of-field doses originating from secondary radiation for brain tumor treatments, but that the cumulative doses from repeated CBCT imaging could have a relevant impact on the overall dose reduction.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
Stockholm: Department of Physics, Stockholm University, 2018. s. 55
HSV kategori
Forskningsprogram
medicinsk strålningsfysik
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:su:diva-161044 (URN)978-91-7797-470-3 (ISBN)978-91-7797-471-0 (ISBN)
Disputas
2018-11-30, Rehabsalen, Norrbacka, S2 plan 01, Karolinska Universitetssjukhuset, Solna, Stockholm, 09:00 (engelsk)
Opponent
Veileder
Tilgjengelig fra: 2018-11-07 Laget: 2018-10-16 Sist oppdatert: 2022-02-26bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler i DiVA

Andre lenker

Forlagets fulltekstPubMedScopus

Person

Ardenfors, Oscar

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Ardenfors, Oscar
Av organisasjonen
I samme tidsskrift
Acta Oncologica

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Totalt: 345 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf