Ändra sökning
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Stewardship as a boundary object for sustainability research: Linking care, knowledge and agency
Stockholms universitet, Naturvetenskapliga fakulteten, Stockholm Resilience Centre.ORCID-id: 0000-0002-9738-0593
Stockholms universitet, Naturvetenskapliga fakulteten, Stockholm Resilience Centre.ORCID-id: 0000-0002-5379-9309
Stockholms universitet, Naturvetenskapliga fakulteten, Stockholm Resilience Centre.ORCID-id: 0000-0002-0265-5356
Visa övriga samt affilieringar
Antal upphovsmän: 62018 (Engelska)Ingår i: Landscape and Urban Planning, ISSN 0169-2046, E-ISSN 1872-6062, Vol. 179, s. 17-37Artikel, forskningsöversikt (Refereegranskat) Published
Abstract [en]

Current sustainability challenges - including biodiversity loss, pollution and land-use change require new ways of understanding, acting in and caring for the landscapes we live in. The concept of stewardship is increasingly used in research, policy and practice to articulate and describe responses to these challenges. However, there are multiple meanings and framings of stewardship across this wide user base that reflect different disciplinary purposes, assumptions and expertise, as well as a long history of use in both academic and lay contexts. Stewardship may therefore be considered a 'boundary object'; that is, a conceptual tool that enables collaboration and dialogue between different actors whilst allowing for differences in use and perception. This paper seeks to map out the multiple meanings of stewardship in the literature and help researchers and practitioners to navigate the challenges and opportunities that come with using the term. We provide the first qualitative systematic review of stewardship, and identify four distinct meanings of the concept in the literature: Ethic, Motivation, Action and Outcome. We then develop a novel framework for thinking through and connecting these multiple meanings, centered around three dimensions: care, knowledge and agency. This framework is used to identify the care dimension and relational approaches as important areas for future stewardship research. In these efforts - and for scholars engaging with the stewardship concept more broadly - this paper can act as a helpful 'centering device', connecting practitioners, policy-makers and researchers from multiple disciplines in pursuit of sustainability.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
2018. Vol. 179, s. 17-37
Nyckelord [en]
Anthropocene, Environmental ethics, Human-nature relations, Literature review, Natural resource management
Nationell ämneskategori
Biologiska vetenskaper Social och ekonomisk geografi Geovetenskap och relaterad miljövetenskap
Forskningsämne
vetenskap om hållbar utveckling
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-160999DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.07.005ISI: 000444927200002OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-160999DiVA, id: diva2:1256006
Tillgänglig från: 2018-10-15 Skapad: 2018-10-15 Senast uppdaterad: 2025-01-31Bibliografiskt granskad
Ingår i avhandling
1. Stewardship in an urban world: Civic engagement and human–nature relations in the Anthropocene
Öppna denna publikation i ny flik eller fönster >>Stewardship in an urban world: Civic engagement and human–nature relations in the Anthropocene
2017 (Engelska)Doktorsavhandling, sammanläggning (Övrigt vetenskapligt)
Abstract [en]

Never before have humans wielded a greater ability to alter and disrupt planetary processes. Our impact is becoming so noticeable that a new geological epoch has been proposed – the Anthropocene – in which Earth systems might no longer maintain the stable and predictable conditions of the past 12 millennia. This is particularly evident in the rapid expansion of urban areas, where a majority of humans now live and where environmental changes such as rising temperatures and habitat loss are happening faster than elsewhere.  In light of this, questions have been raised about what a more responsible relationship between humans and the rest of the planet might look like. Scholars in sustainability science employ the concept of ‘stewardship’ in searching for an answer; however, with multiple different applications and definitions, there is a need to better understand what stewardship is or what novelty it might add to sustainability research. This thesis investigates stewardship empirically through two case studies of civic engagement for protecting nature in cities – Bengaluru, India and New York City, USA. Further, the thesis also proposes a conceptual framework for how to understand stewardship as a relation between humans and the rest of nature, based on three dimensions: care, knowledge and agency. This investigation into stewardship in the urban context uses a social–ecological systems approach to guide the use of mixed theory and methods from social and natural sciences. The thesis is organized in five papers. Paper I reviews defining challenges in managing urban social–ecological systems and proposes that these can more effectively be addressed by collaborative networks where public, civic, other actors contribute unique skills and abilities. Paper II and Paper III study water resource governance in Bengaluru, a city that has become dependent on external sources while its own water bodies become degraded and depleted.Paper II analyzes how locally based ‘lake groups’ are able to affect change through co-management arrangements, reversing decades of centralization and neglect of lakes’ role in Bengaluru’s water supply.Paper III uses social–ecological network analysis to analyze how patterns in lake groups’ engagements and collaborations show better fit with ecological connectivity of lakes.Paper IV employs sense of place methods to explore how personal bonds to a site shapes motivation and goals in waterfront stewardship in New York City. Finally,Paper V reviews literature on stewardship and proposes a conceptual framework to understand and relate different uses and underlying epistemological approaches in the field. In summary, this thesis presents an empirically grounded contribution to how stewardship can be understood as a human–nature relation emergent from a deep sense ofcare and responsibility, knowledge and learning about how to understand social–ecological dynamics, and theagency and skills needed to influence these dynamics in a way that benefits a greater community of humans as others. Here, the care dimension is particularly important as an underappreciated aspect of social–ecological relations, and asset for addressing spatial and temporal misalignment between management institutions and ecosystem. This thesis shows that care for nature does not erode just because green spaces are degraded by human activities – which may be crucial for promoting stewardship in the Anthropocene.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
Stockholm: Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, 2017
Nyckelord
agency, Bengaluru, boundary object, care, civil society, community, environmental ethics, knowledge, natural resource management, New York City, problem of fit, rigidity trap, sense of place, social–ecological system, urbanization, water governance
Nationell ämneskategori
Annan geovetenskap Oceanografi, hydrologi och vattenresurser Freds- och konfliktforskning Övrig annan samhällsvetenskap
Forskningsämne
vetenskap om hållbar utveckling
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:su:diva-146193 (URN)978-91-7649-933-7 (ISBN)978-91-7649-934-4 (ISBN)
Disputation
2017-10-13, Vivi Täckholmssalen (Q-salen), NPQ-huset, Svante Arrhenius väg 20, Stockholm, 09:00 (Engelska)
Opponent
Handledare
Forskningsfinansiär
Mistra - Stiftelsen för miljöstrategisk forskningSida - Styrelsen för internationellt utvecklingssamarbete, AKT-2010-046
Anmärkning

At the time of the doctoral defense, the following papers were unpublished and had a status as follows: Paper 3: Manuscript. Paper 4: Manuscript. Paper 5: Manuscript.

Tillgänglig från: 2017-09-20 Skapad: 2017-08-30 Senast uppdaterad: 2025-02-20Bibliografiskt granskad

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltext saknas i DiVA

Övriga länkar

Förlagets fulltext

Person

West, SimonMasterson, Vanessa A.Haider, L. JamilaSvedin, UnoTengö, Maria

Sök vidare i DiVA

Av författaren/redaktören
West, SimonMasterson, Vanessa A.Haider, L. JamilaSvedin, UnoTengö, Maria
Av organisationen
Stockholm Resilience Centre
I samma tidskrift
Landscape and Urban Planning
Biologiska vetenskaperSocial och ekonomisk geografiGeovetenskap och relaterad miljövetenskap

Sök vidare utanför DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetricpoäng

doi
urn-nbn
Totalt: 230 träffar
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf