Ändra sökning
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
A Modeling Comparison of Groundwater Potential Mapping in a Mountain Bedrock Aquifer: QUEST, GARP, and RF Models
Stockholms universitet, Naturvetenskapliga fakulteten, Institutionen för naturgeografi.
Antal upphovsmän: 42020 (Engelska)Ingår i: Water, E-ISSN 2073-4441, Vol. 12, nr 3Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat) Published
Abstract [en]

In some arid regions, groundwater is the only source of water for human needs, so understanding groundwater potential is essential to ensure its sustainable use. In this study, three machine learning models (Genetic Algorithm for Rule-Set Production (GARP), Quick Unbiased Efficient Statistical Tree (QUEST), and Random Forest (RF)) were applied and verified for spatial prediction of groundwater in a mountain bedrock aquifer in Piranshahr Watershed, Iran. A spring location dataset consisting of 141 springs was prepared by field surveys, and from this three different sample datasets (S1-S3) were randomly generated (70% for training and 30% for validation). A total of 10 groundwater conditioning factors were prepared for modeling, namely slope percent, relative slope position (RSP), plan curvature, altitude, drainage density, slope aspect, topographic wetness index (TWI), terrain ruggedness index (TRI), land use, and lithology. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and true skill statistic (TSS) were used to evaluate the accuracy of models. The results indicated that all models had excellent goodness-of-fit and predictive performance, but that RF (AUC(mean) = 0.995, TSSmean = 0.89) and GARP (AUC(mean) = 0.957, TSSmean = 0.82) outperformed QUEST (AUC(mean) = 0.949, TSSmean = 0.74). In robustness analysis, RF was slightly more sensitive than GARP and QUEST, making it necessary to consider several random partitioning options for preparing training and validation groups. The outcomes of this study can be useful in sustainable management of groundwater resources in the study region.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
2020. Vol. 12, nr 3
Nyckelord [en]
spatial modeling, machine-learning, algorithms, distribution models
Nationell ämneskategori
Geovetenskap och relaterad miljövetenskap
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-181771DOI: 10.3390/w12030679ISI: 000529249500064OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-181771DiVA, id: diva2:1432384
Tillgänglig från: 2020-05-27 Skapad: 2020-05-27 Senast uppdaterad: 2025-02-07Bibliografiskt granskad

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltext saknas i DiVA

Övriga länkar

Förlagets fulltext

Person

Kalantari, Zahra

Sök vidare i DiVA

Av författaren/redaktören
Kalantari, Zahra
Av organisationen
Institutionen för naturgeografi
I samma tidskrift
Water
Geovetenskap och relaterad miljövetenskap

Sök vidare utanför DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetricpoäng

doi
urn-nbn
Totalt: 106 träffar
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf