Ändra sökning
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Does practice make perfect? The effects of an eight-week manualized deliberate practice course with peer feedback on patient-rated working alliance in adults: A pilot randomized controlled trial
Stockholms universitet, Samhällsvetenskapliga fakulteten, Psykologiska institutionen.ORCID-id: 0000-0003-0720-8130
Visa övriga samt affilieringar
Antal upphovsmän: 52024 (Engelska)Ingår i: Clinical Psychology in Europe, E-ISSN 2625-3410, Vol. 6, nr 3, artikel-id e12353Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: Deliberate Practice (DP), which underscores the importance of expert mentorship, personalized learning objectives, feedback, and repetition, has been suggested as a method to enhance the effectiveness of therapists.

Method: The study tested the efficacy of an eight-week, structured, group-based online course, enriched with peer feedback, for 37 Cognitive Behavioral Therapists. The goal was to assess whether this intervention could boost the quality of therapist-patient alliances, as compared to a control group. To measure this, therapists had their patients anonymously fill out the Session Alliance Inventory both before and after the course. The trial encompassed 120 patient alliance ratings at baseline and 64 at the post-course measurement. The DP course was comprised of a 75-minute remote video workshop each week for eight weeks, supplemented by related study materials. Each workshop focused on a specific skill, such as responding to client resistance, and included 55 minutes of concentrated role-play activities, providing ample opportunities for repetition and feedback.

Results: Using a linear mixed model we did not find an effect on patient alliance ratings. However, we observed a trend (p = .054) indicating that the DP group decreased their alliance ratings (Cohen’s d = -0.40), while the control group demonstrated an increase in their scores (d = 0.49).

Conclusion: This pilot study did not find support for DP leading to better patient-rated alliance compared to a waitlist control. However, the study had several methodological limitations. Further and more rigorous investigation of the effects of DP on patient outcomes is recommended.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
2024. Vol. 6, nr 3, artikel-id e12353
Nyckelord [en]
deliberate practice, working alliance, cognitive behavioural therapy, professional development, psychotherapy outcomes, therapist effects
Nationell ämneskategori
Psykologi
Forskningsämne
psykologi
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-234023DOI: 10.32872/cpe.12353ISI: 001336358900002Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85206175444OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-234023DiVA, id: diva2:1903221
Tillgänglig från: 2024-10-03 Skapad: 2024-10-03 Senast uppdaterad: 2024-11-12Bibliografiskt granskad

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltext saknas i DiVA

Övriga länkar

Förlagets fulltextScopus

Person

Carlbring, Per

Sök vidare i DiVA

Av författaren/redaktören
Lagerberg, HåkanBoswell, James F.Constantino, Michael J.Andersson, GerhardCarlbring, Per
Av organisationen
Psykologiska institutionenKlinisk psykologi
I samma tidskrift
Clinical Psychology in Europe
Psykologi

Sök vidare utanför DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetricpoäng

doi
urn-nbn
Totalt: 50 träffar
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf