Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Marine nature conservation and fisheries - management of interacting and conflicting interests - a road map for the future
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Department of Ecology, Environment and Plant Sciences.
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Department of Ecology, Environment and Plant Sciences.
(English)In: Marine Policy, ISSN 0308-597X, E-ISSN 1872-9460Article in journal (Refereed) Submitted
Abstract [en]

The establishment of Marine Protected Areas lags far behind the establishment of Terrestrial Protected Areas. In many countries a lack of consensus between nature conservation and fishery interests has complicated and inhibited progress and delayed the establishment of Marine Protected Areas for both conservation and fishery purposes. 

To achieve a more balanced weighing of fishery and nature conservation interests in the future, there is a need to improve and enforce the coordination and harmonization of conservation and fishery objectives. An appropriate instrument for this coordination is a Marine Spatial Planning process that involves all relevant stakeholders in the planning and decision-making process.   

Strategic Environmental Assessment for plans and programmes, and Environmental Impact Assessment for projects are commonly used tools for environmental management but have not, so far, been used for capture fisheries. The diversity of fisheries and the drastic effects of certain fisheries on the environment are strong arguments for introducing these procedures as complements to existing fisheries management and assessment tools. This would improve information on the environmental effects of fisheries relevant to the planning and decision-making process pertaining to conflicts between fishery and marine protected areas.  

In the future, legal management of Marine Protected Areas should differ depending on whether they were designated for nature conservation purposes, under conservation law or for fishery purposes, under fishery law. When these two interests conflict in a Marine Protected Area established for nature conservation purposes, the fishery should be managed under the conservation law, as other environmentally relevant activities.   

National Category
Biological Sciences
Research subject
Marine Ecology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-155532OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-155532DiVA, id: diva2:1200465
Available from: 2018-04-24 Created: 2018-04-24 Last updated: 2022-02-26Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Marine environmental governance and management in Sweden from the 1960s until today: Did the actions suit the needs?
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Marine environmental governance and management in Sweden from the 1960s until today: Did the actions suit the needs?
2018 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

This thesis investigates how governance and management relevant to the use and protection of the marine environment has emerged in Sweden from the 1960s until today. Focus is on how the modern environmental and nature conservation administration in Sweden developed the legal and organizational frameworks needed for proper management. More specifically – did the available tools suit the needs?

The Swedish National Physical Planning system, initiated in the mid-1960s, pioneered the concept of ecology as basis for physical planning in Sweden. This introduced environmental considerations in societal planning, inter alia, through special national guidelines (geographical and for certain activities) for local authority planning. The National Physical Planning system strengthened the cooperation between local and regional (county) authorities and with central governmental bodies. With some delay, marine spatial planning became the instrument for coordinating and balancing competing demands on coastal and marine environments.

Marine environmental governance and management are commonly linked to intergovernmental agreements, usually in the form of international conventions. Measures against pollution and other threats to the marine environment, as well as conservation of its natural resources and biodiversity, become more efficient when countries work together through global or regional organizations, rather than each country is acting on its own (Article I). However, it should be noted that in practice many intergovernmental agreements are less binding than first appears.

While marine pollution began to be addressed and remedied in the 1980s, it was only in the 2000s that marine nature conservation and the establishment of marine protected areas began to receive increased attention and effective action (Article II).

Marine nature conservation and fisheries often conflict, as the establishment of a marine protected area commonly involves a restriction on some ongoing fishing. Usually, such conflicts are related to differences in the objectives between marine protected areas established for environmental and fishery purposes, which often leads to strongly conflicting opinions on how to manage them (Articles II–III).

Initial environmental and nature conservation efforts focused on measures against land, air and freshwater pollution, and the conservation of terrestrial environments. Excepting inner coastal areas, the open marine environment was not a focus of Swedish marine research although ecosystem research began early in the Baltic Sea. However, by the mid-1980s large-scale effects of pollution also on the open seas along the Swedish west coast, had become apparent and required environmental management actions (Article IV).

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Stockholm: Department of Ecology, Environment and Plant Sciences, Stockholm University, 2018. p. 50
Keywords
International programmes on ocean and seas, Baltic Sea, Kattegat-Skagerrak, Marine spatial planning and management
National Category
Ecology
Research subject
Marine Ecology
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:su:diva-155538 (URN)978-91-7797-322-5 (ISBN)978-91-7797-323-2 (ISBN)
Public defence
2018-06-15, Vivi Täckholmsalen (Q-salen), NPQ-huset, Svante Arrhenius väg 20, Stockholm, 09:15 (Swedish)
Opponent
Supervisors
Note

At the time of the doctoral defense, the following paper was unpublished and had a status as follows: Paper 3: Submitted.

Available from: 2018-05-23 Created: 2018-04-24 Last updated: 2022-02-26Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(127 kB)214 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 127 kBChecksum SHA-512
73dd17284db134457ea859c72fb630412d3b32b561f2b24a003b1d8a354d95fb17b2aa74a003b0d91f48af3d9b174c23bdc48e3d43fba9264f6821a9ba8c0c29
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Authority records

Grip, KjellBlomqvist, Sven

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Grip, KjellBlomqvist, Sven
By organisation
Department of Ecology, Environment and Plant Sciences
In the same journal
Marine Policy
Biological Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 215 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 254 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf