Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The Tail does not Determine the Size of the Giant
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Department of Mathematics.
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Department of Mathematics.
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Department of Mathematics.
Number of Authors: 32018 (English)In: Journal of statistical physics, ISSN 0022-4715, E-ISSN 1572-9613, Vol. 173, no 3-4, p. 736-745Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The size of the giant component in the configuration model, measured by the asymptotic fraction of vertices in the component, is given by a well-known expression involving the generating function of the degree distribution. In this note, we argue that the distribution over small degrees is more important for the size of the giant component than the precise distribution over very large degrees. In particular, the tail behavior of the degree distribution does not play the same crucial role for the size of the giant as it does for many other properties of the graph. Upper and lower bounds for the component size are derived for an arbitrary given distribution over small degrees d <= L and given expected degree, and numerical implementations show that these bounds are close already for small values of L. On the other hand, examples illustrate that, for a fixed degree tail, the component size can vary substantially depending on the distribution over small degrees.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2018. Vol. 173, no 3-4, p. 736-745
Keywords [en]
Configuration model, Component size, Degree distribution
National Category
Mathematics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-162885DOI: 10.1007/s10955-018-2071-4ISI: 000450490500010OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-162885DiVA, id: diva2:1273604
Available from: 2018-12-21 Created: 2018-12-21 Last updated: 2022-03-23Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Random Graph and Growth Models
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Random Graph and Growth Models
2020 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Random graphs is a well-studied field of probability theory, and have proven very useful in a range of applications — modeling social networks, epidemics, and structures on the Internet to name a few. However, most random graphs are static in the sense that the network structure does not change over time. Furthermore, standard models also tend to consist of single-type objects. This puts restrictions on possible applications. The first part of this thesis concerns random graphs with a focus on dynamic and multi-type extensions of standard models. The second part of the thesis deals with random growth models. Random growth models are important objects in probability theory and, as the name suggests, models the random growth of some entity. Typical examples include infectious disease spread; how a liquid flows through a random medium; and tumor growth. The growth of these models, properly scaled by time, tends to be deterministic. The second theme of the thesis concerns the final shape of the growing entity for two standard random growth models.

In Paper I, we study a dynamic version of the famous Erdős-Rényi graph. The graph changes dynamically over time but still has the static Erdős-Rényi graph as its stationary distribution. In studying the dynamic graph we present two results. The first result concerns the time to stationarity, and the second concerns the time it takes for the graph to reach a certain number of edges. We also study the time until a large component emerges, as well as how it emerges.

In Paper II, we introduce and study an extension of the preferential attachment tree. The standard version is already dynamic, but its vertices are only allowed to be of one type. We introduce a multi-type analog of the preferential attachment tree and study its asymptotic degree distributions as well as its asymptotic composition.

Paper III concerns the configuration model — a random graph neither dynamic nor multi-type — and we break with the first theme of the thesis since no extensions are made to the model. Instead, we argue that the size of the largest component in the model does not depend on the tail of the degree distribution, but rather on the distribution over small degrees. This is quantified in some detail.

In Paper IV, we consider the frog model on Zd and a two-type extension of it. For the one-type model, we show that the asymptotic shape does not depend on the initial set and the particle configuration there. For the two-type model, we show that the possibility of both types to coexist also does not depend on the initial sets and the particle configurations there.

Paper V is concerned with the predictability of the set of discovered sites generated by the first passage percolation model. First passage percolation has the property that the set of discovered sites, scaled properly by time, converges to some deterministic set as time grows. Typically, not much is known about this set, and to get an impression of it simulations are needed. Using simulated data we show that it is possible to use a neural network to adequately predict the shape, on this dataset, from some easily calculable properties of the passage times. The purpose of the paper is to give researchers a proof of concept of this method as wells as a new tool for quickly getting an impression of the shape.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Stockholm: Department of Mathematics, Stockholm University, 2020. p. 31
National Category
Probability Theory and Statistics
Research subject
Mathematical Statistics
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:su:diva-184028 (URN)978-91-7911-256-1 (ISBN)978-91-7911-257-8 (ISBN)
Public defence
2020-09-25, sal 15, hus 5, Kräftriket, Roslagsvägen 101, Stockholm, 13:00 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Note

At the time of the doctoral defense paper 3 had the following status: manuscript

Available from: 2020-09-02 Created: 2020-08-12 Last updated: 2022-02-26Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records

Deijfen, MariaRosengren, SebastianTrapman, Pieter

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Deijfen, MariaRosengren, SebastianTrapman, Pieter
By organisation
Department of Mathematics
In the same journal
Journal of statistical physics
Mathematics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 118 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf