Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Exploring intentionality in lexical transfer
Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Education.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4322-121X
Stockholm University, Faculty of Humanities, Department of English.
2020 (English)In: International Journal of Multilingualism, ISSN 1479-0718, E-ISSN 1747-7530, Vol. 17, no 4, p. 516-534Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Traditionally, transfer is described as interference and consequently as an unintentional mechanism. More recently, however, the perception of control in transfer has changed and it is now commonly accepted that transfer can occur both automatically and strategically. Studies have previously employed think-aloud protocols during writing tasks to establish the degree of intentionality in transfer. However, this method does not let us distinguish between instances of transfer that are truly unintentional and instances that were simply not commented on due to the constraints imposed by the think-aloud protocol. The present study, therefore, conducted a stimulated recall interview in direct succession of the think-aloud protocol in order to categorise also those instances of transfer that were not commented on initially. With data from highly multilingual adult learners of Catalan, the study examines the proportion of unintentional and intentional transfer in relation to (1) different types of transfer, (2) different source languages of transfer and (3) different word classes in transfer. The data indicates that some of these aspects of transfer tend to occur unintentionally, whereas others are more prone to be used intentionally. The theoretical implications of the results, as well as their limitations, are discussed.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2020. Vol. 17, no 4, p. 516-534
Keywords [en]
Intentionality, awareness, transfer, crosslinguistic influence, think-aloud protocol, stimulated recall
National Category
General Language Studies and Linguistics
Research subject
Linguistics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-164115DOI: 10.1080/14790718.2018.1559845ISI: 000570134100007OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-164115DiVA, id: diva2:1278187
Available from: 2019-01-13 Created: 2019-01-13 Last updated: 2021-11-28Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1697 kB)183 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1697 kBChecksum SHA-512
81d9e06c1cdbd7e67f4457ea789862e80fca475062518d9762059139d535f065b9dae4683bdceeea92450cc3c360e39b6f2f3b028f29f2711fcb32815222c421
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records

Fuster, CarlesNeuser, Hannah

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Fuster, CarlesNeuser, Hannah
By organisation
Department of EducationDepartment of English
In the same journal
International Journal of Multilingualism
General Language Studies and Linguistics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 183 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 292 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf