Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Cancer risk after breast proton therapy considering physiological and radiobiological uncertainties
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Department of Physics. RaySearch Laboratories AB, Sweden.
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Department of Physics.
Show others and affiliations
2020 (English)In: Physica medica (Testo stampato), ISSN 1120-1797, E-ISSN 1724-191X, Vol. 76, p. 1-6Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: The reduced normal tissue dose burden from protons can reduce the risk of second cancer for breast cancer patients. Breathing motion and the impact of variable relative biological effectiveness (RBE) are however concerns for proton dose distributions. This study aimed to quantify the impact of these factors on risk predictions from proton and photon therapy.

Materials and methods: Twelve patients were planned in free breathing with protons and photons to deliver 50 Gy (RBE) in 25 fractions (assuming RBE = 1.1 for protons) to the left breast. Second cancer risk was evaluated with several models for the lungs, contralateral breast, heart and esophagus as organs at risk (OARs). Plans were recalculated on CT-datasets acquired in extreme phases to account for breathing motion. Proton plans were also recalculated assuming variable RBE for a range of radiobiological parameters.

Results: The OARs received substantially lower doses from protons compared to photons. The highest risks were for the lungs (average second cancer risks of 0.31% and 0.12% from photon and proton plans, respectively). The reduced risk with protons was maintained, even when breathing and/or RBE variation were taken into account. Furthermore, while the total risks from the photon plans were seen to increase with the integral dose, no such correlation was observed for the proton plans.

Conclusions: Protons have an advantage over the photons with respect to the induction of cancer. Uncertainties in physiological movements and radiobiological parameters affected the absolute risk estimates, but not the general trend of lower risk associated with proton therapy.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2020. Vol. 76, p. 1-6
Keywords [en]
Risk of second cancer, Proton therapy, Breast cancer
National Category
Cancer and Oncology Physical Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-182437DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.06.012ISI: 000567550000001PubMedID: 32563956Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85086562945OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-182437DiVA, id: diva2:1438728
Available from: 2020-06-11 Created: 2020-06-11 Last updated: 2022-11-07Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Ödén, JakobArdenfors, OscarFlejmer, Anna M.Toma-Dasu, IulianaDasu, Alexandru

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Ödén, JakobArdenfors, OscarFlejmer, Anna M.Toma-Dasu, IulianaDasu, Alexandru
By organisation
Department of Physics
In the same journal
Physica medica (Testo stampato)
Cancer and OncologyPhysical Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 166 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf