Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Co-productive agility and four collaborative pathways to sustainability transformations
Show others and affiliations
Number of Authors: 422022 (English)In: Global Environmental Change, ISSN 0959-3780, E-ISSN 1872-9495, Vol. 72, article id 102422Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Co-production, the collaborative weaving of research and practice by diverse societal actors, is argued to play an important role in sustainability transformations. Yet, there is still poor understanding of how to navigate the tensions that emerge in these processes. Through analyzing 32 initiatives worldwide that co-produced knowledge and action to foster sustainable social-ecological relations, we conceptualize 'co-productive agility' as an emergent feature vital for turning tensions into transformations. Co-productive agility refers to the willingness and ability of diverse actors to iteratively engage in reflexive dialogues to grow shared ideas and actions that would not have been possible from the outset. It relies on embedding knowledge production within processes of change to constantly recognize, reposition, and navigate tensions and opportunities. Co-productive agility opens up multiple pathways to transformation through: (1) elevating marginalized agendas in ways that maintain their integrity and broaden struggles for justice; (2) questioning dominant agendas by engaging with power in ways that challenge assumptions, (3) navigating conflicting agendas to actively transform interlinked paradigms, practices, and structures; (4) exploring diverse agendas to foster learning and mutual respect for a plurality of perspectives. We explore six process considerations that vary by these four pathways and provide a framework to enable agility in sustainability transformations. We argue that research and practice spend too much time closing down debate over different agendas for change - thereby avoiding, suppressing, or polarizing tensions, and call for more efforts to facilitate better interactions among different agendas.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2022. Vol. 72, article id 102422
Keywords [en]
Co-production, Transformative processes, Social-ecological relations, Power relations
National Category
Other Social Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-201326DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102422ISI: 000738910700006OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-201326DiVA, id: diva2:1632616
Available from: 2022-01-27 Created: 2022-01-27 Last updated: 2022-02-25Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records

Fernández-Giménez, María E.Österblom, HenrikSpierenburg, MarjaTengö, MariaGuerrero, Angela M.

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Fernández-Giménez, María E.Österblom, HenrikSpierenburg, MarjaTengö, MariaGuerrero, Angela M.
By organisation
Stockholm Resilience Centre
In the same journal
Global Environmental Change
Other Social Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 97 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf