Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Sex-specific inbreeding depression: A meta-analysis
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Department of Zoology, Ethology. University of Oxford, UK.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4349-8163
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Department of Zoology, Ethology.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6064-6562
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Department of Zoology, Ethology.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2834-4409
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Department of Zoology, Ethology. Wageningen University & Research, The Netherlands.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3473-1402
Number of Authors: 42022 (English)In: Ecology Letters, ISSN 1461-023X, E-ISSN 1461-0248, Vol. 25, no 4, p. 1009-1026Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Inbreeding depression, the reduced fitness of the offspring of related individuals, can affect males and females differently. Although a comprehensive theoretical framework describing the causes of sex-specific inbreeding depression is lacking, empirical evidence suggests that often one sex tends to be more vulnerable than the other. However, the generality, direction, and degree of sex-specific difference in inbreeding depression remains enigmatic as studies on this topic have reported conflicting results. Here, we conduct a meta-analysis to test for sex-specific differences in the magnitude of inbreeding depression. We synthetised 321 effect sizes of experimental studies across 47 species and found a small difference in inbreeding depression between the sexes: females suffered slightly higher inbreeding depression than males. Furthermore, a higher inbreeding coefficient was correlated with higher inbreeding depression. However, there was a large amount of heterogeneity that remained unexplained, even when considering different factors that could affect inbreeding between the sexes, such as sexual size dimorphism, heterogamety, the type of trait measured and whether animals were tested in a stressful environment. As such, we highlight the need to further explore inbreeding depression across different species to determine the occurrence and causes of sex differences to increase our understanding of the evolutionary consequences of sex-specific inbreeding depression.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2022. Vol. 25, no 4, p. 1009-1026
Keywords [en]
heterogamous, homozygosity, incest, sexual conflict, sexual selection
National Category
Biological Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-202032DOI: 10.1111/ele.13961ISI: 000745122600001PubMedID: 35064612Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85123313542OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-202032DiVA, id: diva2:1636667
Available from: 2022-02-10 Created: 2022-02-10 Last updated: 2022-06-03Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Vega-Trejo, Reginade Boer, Raïssa A.Fitzpatrick, JohnKotrschal, Alexander

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Vega-Trejo, Reginade Boer, Raïssa A.Fitzpatrick, JohnKotrschal, Alexander
By organisation
Ethology
In the same journal
Ecology Letters
Biological Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 57 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf