Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Dependence on seagrass fisheries governed by household income and adaptive capacity
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Department of Ecology, Environment and Plant Sciences. Project Seagrass, UK.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6058-9692
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Department of Ecology, Environment and Plant Sciences.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6936-0926
Show others and affiliations
Number of Authors: 102022 (English)In: Ocean and Coastal Management, ISSN 0964-5691, E-ISSN 1873-524X, Vol. 225, article id 106247Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Seagrass meadows, like other tropical coastal ecosystems, are highly productive and sustain millions of people worldwide. However, the factors that govern the use of seagrass as a fishing habitat over other habitats are largely unknown, especially at the household scale. Using socioeconomic factors from 147 villages across four countries within the Indo-Pacific, we examined the drivers of household dependence on seagrass. We revealed that seagrass was the most common habitat used for fishing across villages in all the countries studied, being preferred over other habitats for reliability. Using structural equation modelling, we exposed how household income and adaptive capacity appears to govern dependence on seagrass. Poorer households were less likely to own motorboats and dependent on seagrass as they were unable to fish elsewhere, whereas wealthier households were more likely to invest in certain fishing gears that incentivised them to use seagrass habitats due to high rewards and low effort requirements. Our findings accentuate the complexity of seagrass social-ecological systems and the need for empirical household scale data for effective management. Safeguarding seagrass is vital to ensure that vulnerable households have equitable and equal access to the resource, addressing ocean recovery and ensuring sustainable coastal communities.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2022. Vol. 225, article id 106247
Keywords [en]
Seagrass meadows, Small-scale fisheries, Adaptive capacity, Livelihoods, Socioeconomics, Social-ecological systems, Household interviews
National Category
Earth and Related Environmental Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-207218DOI: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2022.106247ISI: 000808375900006OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-207218DiVA, id: diva2:1682805
Available from: 2022-07-12 Created: 2022-07-12 Last updated: 2025-02-07Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Of seagrass and society: Exploring contributions of tropical seagrass meadows to food security
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Of seagrass and society: Exploring contributions of tropical seagrass meadows to food security
2022 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Conserving biodiversity while simultaneously feeding a growing population is one of the grand challenges of the Anthropocene. Recently, global assessments have shone a light on the importance of the marine environment for the supply of food (often termed blue food), as well as the diverse and many livelihood opportunities associated to it. Small-scale fisheries (SSF) are essential to this, in which the pursuit of fish and invertebrates are central. If we are to look to blue foods to tackle food insecurity, we need deeper understanding of how coastal habitats function at the nexus of biodiversity, people, and food. Simply put, we need to know how habitats contribute to the supply of food, both in terms of ecological functions and social-economic drivers. Seagrass meadows, diverse and abundant across the Indo-Pacific region, are one of numerous coastal ecosystems that provide food and livelihoods opportunities. Using these systems as a setting, this thesis aims to explore how seagrass meadows and their associated SSF contribute to food security. Comprised of five papers, this thesis relies on a mixed-methods approach to understand seagrass social-ecological systems. The papers range in their dependence on empirical data, their scale as well as the methods employed. Paper I used biodiversity ecosystem function theories to assess the influence of seagrass biota on the production of associated fish in the context of SSF in Tanzania. It highlighted that structural seagrass traits, rather than species richness, are key for driving the abundance and richness of species that are key for food. Paper II investigated the socio-economic drivers that influence seagrass use at the household level. It revealed that household use of seagrass meadows for food and income was higher than all other habitats, and that people use seagrass meadows because they are reliable. It also revealed that household income was key in shaping why people use seagrass meadows as fishing grounds, where both low- and high-income households were dependent on the habitat; low income as a safety-net and high income for high rewards. Paper III examined two key elements of food security, food quantity and quality, and revealed how seagrass meadows contribute to both in the context of micronutrients that are vital for human health. Data from across East Africa showed that seagrass meadows played a more important role than other habitats in providing micronutrient-rich fish species. Paper IV used local ecological knowledge to reveal perceived temporal change in fish and invertebrate abundance and size, but simultaneously identified potential contrasting cognitions that place human communities at risk. Finally, Paper V provided a synthesis of past studies that explored how certain sustainable development initiative result in unintended consequences that influence the supply of blue food. It revealed a number of unintended effects which place the people that use seagrass meadows at risk while at the same time lessening the positive effects of the sustainable development initiative itself. This thesis describes the dynamic interactions between biodiversity, people and food, and place seagrass meadows – habitats that exist globally – at the forefront of the blue food agenda. It highlights how seagrass meadows represent many of the qualities we hope for in a food system – a system that provides sufficient, safe, and nutritious food for multiple and diverse individuals across society.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Stockholm: Department of Ecology, Environment and Plant Sciences, Stockholm University, 2022. p. 84
Keywords
Biodiversity, Blue food, Food security, Social-ecological systems, Small-scale fisheries, Seagrass meadows
National Category
Ecology Environmental Sciences Peace and Conflict Studies Other Social Sciences not elsewhere specified
Research subject
Marine Biology
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:su:diva-209538 (URN)978-91-8014-020-1 (ISBN)978-91-8014-021-8 (ISBN)
Public defence
2022-12-02, Vivi Täckholmsalen (Q-salen), NPQ-huset, Svante Arrhenius väg 20, Stockholm, 09:30 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2022-11-09 Created: 2022-09-20 Last updated: 2025-02-20Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records

Jones, Benjamin L. H.Eklöf, Johan S.

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Jones, Benjamin L. H.Eklöf, Johan S.
By organisation
Department of Ecology, Environment and Plant Sciences
In the same journal
Ocean and Coastal Management
Earth and Related Environmental Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 83 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf