Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Predation impacts brain allometry in female guppies (Poecilia reticulata)
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Department of Zoology. University of Oxford, UK.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4349-8163
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Department of Zoology. Wageningen University & Research, Netherlands.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6956-5198
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Department of Zoology.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6008-2672
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Department of Zoology. Wageningen University & Research, Netherlands.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3473-1402
Number of Authors: 42022 (English)In: Evolutionary Ecology, ISSN 0269-7653, E-ISSN 1573-8477, Vol. 36, no 6, p. 1045-1059Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Cognitive and sensory abilities are vital in affecting survival under predation risk, leading to selection on brain anatomy. However, how exactly predation and brain evolution are linked has not yet been resolved, as current empirical evidence is inconclusive. This may be due to predation pressure having different effects across life stages and/or due to confounding factors in ecological comparisons of predation pressure. Here, we used adult guppies (Poecilia reticulata) to experimentally test how direct predation during adulthood would impact the relative brain size and brain anatomy of surviving individuals to examine if predators selectively remove individuals with specific brain morphology. To this end, we compared fish surviving predation to control fish, which were exposed to visual and olfactory predator cues but could not be predated on. We found that predation impacted the relative size of female brains. However, this effect was dependent on body size, as larger female survivors showed relatively larger brains, while smaller survivors showed relatively smaller brains when compared to control females. We found no differences in male relative brain size between survivors and controls, nor for any specific relative brain region sizes for either sex. Our results corroborate the important, yet complex, role of predation as an important driver of variation in brain size. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2022. Vol. 36, no 6, p. 1045-1059
Keywords [en]
Survival, Guppy, Natural selection, Phenotypic plasticity, Brain size evolution
National Category
Biological Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-207599DOI: 10.1007/s10682-022-10191-8ISI: 000814061000002Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85132334156OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-207599DiVA, id: diva2:1685408
Available from: 2022-08-02 Created: 2022-08-02 Last updated: 2022-12-30Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Vega-Trejo, ReginaVila-Pouca, CatarinaMitchell, David J.Kotrschal, Alexander

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Vega-Trejo, ReginaVila-Pouca, CatarinaMitchell, David J.Kotrschal, Alexander
By organisation
Department of Zoology
In the same journal
Evolutionary Ecology
Biological Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 40 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf