Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Transforming sustainable aquaculture by applying circularity principles
Show others and affiliations
Number of Authors: 112024 (English)In: Reviews in Aquaculture, ISSN 1753-5123, E-ISSN 1753-5131, Vol. 16, no 2, p. 656-673Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

A circular economy is considered one way to reduce environmental impacts of human activities, by more efficient use of resources and recovery, resulting in less waste and emissions compared to linear take-make-dispose systems. Muscat et al. developed five ecological principles to guide biomass use towards a circular economy. A few studies have demonstrated environmental benefits of applying these principles to land-based food systems, but to date, these principles have not been explored in aquaculture. The current study expands on these principles and provides a narrative review to (i) translate them to aquaculture, while identifying implications for the main species and production systems, and (ii) identify the main pathways to make aquaculture more circular. We show that the underlying concepts of the ‘safeguard’, ‘entropy’, and ‘recycle’ principles have been well researched and sometimes well implemented. In contrast, the ‘avoid’ and ‘prioritise’ principles have been explored much less; doing so would provide an opportunity to decrease environmental impacts of aquaculture at the food-system level. One example is prioritising the production of species that contribute to food and nutrition security, have low environmental impacts and thinking at wider food system scale to avoid feed-food competition in aquaculture. We identified six priorities that could make aquaculture more circular: (i) increase production and demand for the most essential species, (ii) decrease food loss and waste at farm and post-harvest stages, (iii) support nutrient recycling practices at multiple scales, (iv) adapt aquafeed formulations, (v) inform consumers about benefits of species of low trophic levels and other environmentally friendly aquatic foods, and (vi) address urgent research gaps.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2024. Vol. 16, no 2, p. 656-673
Keywords [en]
aquatic foods and byproducts, ecological intensification, environmental sustainability, food and nutrition security, integrated aquaculture
National Category
Ecology Environmental Sciences Fish and Aquacultural Science
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-222224DOI: 10.1111/raq.12860ISI: 001065424900001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85170851977OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-222224DiVA, id: diva2:1804217
Available from: 2023-10-11 Created: 2023-10-11 Last updated: 2024-04-22Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Troell, MaxHenriksson, Patrik J. G.

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Troell, MaxHenriksson, Patrik J. G.
By organisation
Stockholm Resilience Centre
In the same journal
Reviews in Aquaculture
EcologyEnvironmental SciencesFish and Aquacultural Science

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 47 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf