Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Guest Editorial: The inner immune voice: Can we explicitly sense antibody response to Covid-19 vaccination?
Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Psychology, Stress Research Institute. Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Psychology, Biological psychology. Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8323-0714
Number of Authors: 22023 (English)In: Biological Psychology, ISSN 0301-0511, E-ISSN 1873-6246, Vol. 182, article id 108638Article in journal, Editorial material (Other academic) Published
Abstract [en]

Interoception refers to the sensing, interpreting, and integration of signals coming from the body (i.e., interoceptive signals) by the nervous system (Allen, 2020, Khalsa et al., 2018). Alterations in the processing of interoceptive signals is believed to significantly play a role in the development of mental health conditions (Barrett, 2017, Khalsa et al., 2018), and the methodology for human interoception research is expanding (Garfinkel et al., 2022). Investigations in the field have mostly been restricted to the domain of cardiovascular signals, as well as to the respiratory and gastrointestinal axes (Benson et al., 2012, Garfinkel et al., 2016, Khalsa and Lapidus, 2016). The reason is most likely that humans' appraisal of the status of these signals are commonly explicit and frequently occurring, and due to the fact that the assessment of perceptual alterations in interoceptive awareness (i.e., interoceptive attention, accuracy, intensity, sensibility, and insight) of these signals is convenient. There is less consensus regarding whether other types of bodily signals, such as the status of other organs or various hormonal levels, are reachable in an explicit manner. The study by Dimitroff et al. (2023) suggests, for the first time, that we humans can perhaps explicitly estimate our actual immune response.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2023. Vol. 182, article id 108638
Keywords [en]
interoception, immune response, editorial
National Category
Psychology
Research subject
Psychology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-225035DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2023.108638PubMedID: 37482460Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85165651716OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-225035DiVA, id: diva2:1824477
Available from: 2024-01-05 Created: 2024-01-05 Last updated: 2024-01-12Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Lasselin, Julie

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Lasselin, Julie
By organisation
Stress Research InstituteBiological psychology
In the same journal
Biological Psychology
Psychology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 105 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf