Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The bii4africa dataset of faunal and floral population intactness estimates across Africa's major land uses
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Stockholm Resilience Centre. Stellenbosch University, South Africa.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0300-4149
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Department of Zoology. University of Pretoria, South Africa; Biodiversity Research Institute (CSIC-UO-PA), Spain.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9737-8242
Number of Authors: 2092024 (English)In: Scientific data, ISSN 2052-4463, Vol. 11, no 1, article id 191Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Sub-Saharan Africa is under-represented in global biodiversity datasets, particularly regarding the impact of land use on species' population abundances. Drawing on recent advances in expert elicitation to ensure data consistency, 200 experts were convened using a modified-Delphi process to estimate 'intactness scores': the remaining proportion of an 'intact' reference population of a species group in a particular land use, on a scale from 0 (no remaining individuals) to 1 (same abundance as the reference) and, in rare cases, to 2 (populations that thrive in human-modified landscapes). The resulting bii4africa dataset contains intactness scores representing terrestrial vertebrates (tetrapods: ±5,400 amphibians, reptiles, birds, mammals) and vascular plants (±45,000 forbs, graminoids, trees, shrubs) in sub-Saharan Africa across the region's major land uses (urban, cropland, rangeland, plantation, protected, etc.) and intensities (e.g., large-scale vs smallholder cropland). This dataset was co-produced as part of the Biodiversity Intactness Index for Africa Project. Additional uses include assessing ecosystem condition; rectifying geographic/taxonomic biases in global biodiversity indicators and maps; and informing the Red List of Ecosystems.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2024. Vol. 11, no 1, article id 191
National Category
Ecology Oceanography, Hydrology and Water Resources
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-227975DOI: 10.1038/s41597-023-02832-6ISI: 001163242800001PubMedID: 38346970Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85185102759OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-227975DiVA, id: diva2:1849088
Available from: 2024-04-05 Created: 2024-04-05 Last updated: 2024-04-05Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Biggs, ReinetteDalerum, Fredrik

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Biggs, ReinetteDalerum, Fredrik
By organisation
Stockholm Resilience CentreDepartment of Zoology
EcologyOceanography, Hydrology and Water Resources

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 135 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf