Neural correlates of individual differences in multimodal emotion recognition abilityShow others and affiliations
Number of Authors: 72024 (English)In: Cortex, ISSN 0010-9452, E-ISSN 1973-8102, Vol. 175, p. 1-11Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]
Studies have reported substantial variability in emotion recognition ability (ERA) – an important social skill – but possible neural underpinnings for such individual differences are not well understood. This functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study investigated neural responses during emotion recognition in young adults (N=49) who were selected for inclusion based on their performance (high or low) during previous testing of ERA. Participants were asked to judge brief video recordings in a forced-choice emotion recognition task, wherein stimuli were presented in visual, auditory and multimodal (audiovisual) blocks. Emotion recognition rates during brain scanning confirmed that individuals with high (vs. low) ERA received higher accuracy for all presentation blocks. fMRI-analyses focused on key regions of interest (ROIs) involved in the processing of multimodal emotion expressions, based on previous meta-analyses. In neural response to emotional stimuli contrasted with neutral stimuli, individuals with high (vs. low) ERA showed higher activation in the following ROIs during the multimodal condition: right middle superior temporal gyrus (mSTG), right posterior superior temporal sulcus (PSTS), and right inferior frontal cortex (IFC). Overall, results suggest that individual variability in ERA may be reflected across several stages of decisional processing, including extraction (mSTG), integration (PSTS) and evaluation (IFC) of emotional information.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2024. Vol. 175, p. 1-11
Keywords [en]
emotion recognition, facial expression, fMRI, individual differences, vocal expression
National Category
Psychology
Research subject
Psychology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-228739DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2024.03.009ISI: 001236628700001PubMedID: 38691922Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85191491399OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-228739DiVA, id: diva2:1854178
Note
This work was supported by the Swedish Research Council (2012-00801 to P.L and 2013-00854 to H.F.) and the Marianne and Marcus Wallenberg Foundation (MMW 2018.0059 to P.L). Open access funding was provided by Stockholm University.
2024-04-242024-04-242024-07-01Bibliographically approved