Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Can MRI predict olfactory loss and improvement in posttraumatic olfactory dysfunction?
Show others and affiliations
Number of Authors: 102024 (English)In: Rhinology, ISSN 0300-0729, E-ISSN 1996-8604, Vol. 62, no 2, p. 172-182Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

BACKGROUND: Although most patients with post-traumatic olfactory dysfunction (PTOD) undergo MRI, there is no consensus about its diagnostic or prognostic value.The aims were: 1) to classify the extent of post-traumatic neurodegeneration; 2) todetermine its relationship with chemosensory dysfunction (smell, taste, trigeminal); and 3) to establish whether MRI can predict olfactory improvement. METHODOLOGY: We conducted a retrospective cohort study based on a series of 56 patients with PTOD. All patients underwent validated psychophysical tests of their smell, taste, and trigeminal functions, otorhinolaryngologic evaluation, and MRI. An experiencedradiologist blinded to patient data evaluated 40 chemosensory-relevant brain regions according to a four-point scale (0=no lesion to 3=large lesion). Follow up data after 4 years (on average) were available in 46 patients. RESULTS:The cluster analysis showed 4 brain lesion patterns that differed in lesion localization and severity. They are associatedwith diagnostic categories: anosmia, hyposmia and normosmia. Two clusters were highly specific for anosmia (100% specificity)and could accurately predict this condition (100% positive predictive value). No clusters were associated with trigeminal or tastedysfunction. Regarding improvement, 72.7% of patients in the cluster with mild lesions experienced subjective and measurable olfactory improvement whereas this was only the case in 21.7-37.5% of patients with larger lesions. The odds of subjective smellimprovement were 5.9 times higher in patients within the milder cluster compared to larger ones. CONCLUSIONS: The analysis of brain lesions in PTOD allows corroboration of smell test results and prediction of subjective and measurable improvement.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2024. Vol. 62, no 2, p. 172-182
Keywords [en]
olfaction, taste, trigeminal, head trauma, MRI
National Category
Otorhinolaryngology Neurology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-228702DOI: 10.4193/Rhin23.246ISI: 001197035900011PubMedID: 37955246Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85189719895OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-228702DiVA, id: diva2:1854895
Available from: 2024-04-29 Created: 2024-04-29 Last updated: 2024-04-29Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Lundström, Johan N.

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Lundström, Johan N.
By organisation
SUBIC - Stockholm University Brain Imaging Centre
In the same journal
Rhinology
OtorhinolaryngologyNeurology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 24 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf