Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Collective teacher efficacy and its relationship to attitudes to inclusion of students with special educational needs in Sweden
Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Special Education.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9315-2972
Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Special Education.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2396-4710
Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Special Education.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4598-5718
Number of Authors: 32025 (English)In: European Journal of Special Needs Education, ISSN 0885-6257, E-ISSN 1469-591X, Vol. 40, no 3, p. 457-472Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

This study aimed to investigate the perceived collective teacher efficacy, teacher attitudes to inclusion of students with special educational needs, and the relationship between the constructs in a sample of Swedish teachers. The participants were 930 teachers involved in the Inclusive Behavioural Support in Schools implementation programme. The teachers answered the two questionnaires: The Teacher Attitudes to Inclusion Scale Swedish version (TAIS-Sw) and the Collective Teacher Efficacy Scale (CTES). The questionnaires were analysed and adapted to fit the sample adequately. This exploration identified a three-factor model for TAIS-Sw that is suitable for the data. The three latent variables related to classroom management, perception of the positive effects of inclusion for all students, and objections towards segregated special education. For CTES, a two-factor model showed a good fit for the data. The latent variables were related to aspects of teachers’ competence, including belief in competency and skills to teach all students. The questionnaires identified positive expressions of collective teacher efficacy but more hesitant attitudes to inclusion. Structural equation modelling was used to investigate the relationship between the constructs of collective teacher efficacy and attitudes to inclusion, revealing a small positive relationship. Further investigations could help identify factors supporting successful inclusive practices.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2025. Vol. 40, no 3, p. 457-472
Keywords [en]
Collective teacher efficacy, attitudes to inclusion, special educational needs
National Category
Pedagogy
Research subject
Special Education
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-232114DOI: 10.1080/08856257.2024.2380592ISI: 001274819800001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85199298762OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-232114DiVA, id: diva2:1885841
Funder
Swedish Research Council Formas, 2017-03683Available from: 2024-07-26 Created: 2024-07-26 Last updated: 2025-09-08Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Teachers’ perceptions of barriers and facilitators in implementing innovations for inclusive education
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Teachers’ perceptions of barriers and facilitators in implementing innovations for inclusive education
2025 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Implementation of evidence-based innovations in school bridges the gap between research and practice. During implementation, barriers and facilitators for progression and sustainability may arise. When teachers are consulted about their perceptions during the process, various factors can be identified that influence the initiation, execution, and sustainability of innovation implementation.

This thesis investigated teachers’ perceptions of the barriers and facilitators in implementing innovations for inclusive education in Swedish schools. Using implementation frameworks and questionnaires, teachers’ perceptions of implementation factors were captured at different stages of implementation in three distinct projects.

Study I used group interviews at three time points over a six month period to investigate six preschool class teachers’ perceptions of the implementation of cooperative learning. The Theoretical Domains Framework was used for deductive thematic analysis. Both barriers and facilitators were identified at each time point. However, an overall positive progression was observed, with initial barriers being overcome as the implementation progressed.

Study II investigated the perceptions of 127 teachers and school staff after the implementation of the Inclusive Behavioural Support in Schools programme. The Determinants of Implementation Behaviour Questionnaire for School settings was used to assess teachers’ perceived barriers and facilitators regarding this innovation and its implementation. The questionnaire was also tested for theoretical and internal fit. Facilitators included the absence of negative emotions, intentions to continue using the innovation, and the fit between the innovation and the teacher’s professional identity. Barriers included using the innovation under sub-optimal conditions, a lack of positive reinforcement, and an unsupportive socio-political context. Additionally, the study found significant differences in perceptions between teachers in earlier and later school years, as well as between implementation group members and non-members.

Study III surveyed 930 teachers at the start of the implementation of the programme Inclusive Behavioural Support in Schools, concerning two constructs: collective teacher efficacy and teacher attitudes toward the inclusion of students with special educational needs. These constructs were measured using the Collective Teacher Efficacy Scale and the Teacher Attitudes to Inclusion Scale. The scales were evaluated for sample fit and a small but significant positive relationship between the constructs was found.

The thesis demonstrated how the Theoretical Domains Framework and the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation – Behaviour (COM-B) system could be used to identify important factors affecting implementation, both as an analytical framework and as framework for a questionnaire for the school setting.

Overall, the thesis identified perceptions and attitudes related to the importance of providing structural and social implementation support, ensuring a practical and philosophical fit between innovation and teacher perceptions, and providing opportunities for teachers to build individual and collegial confidence and efficacy in using innovations for inclusive education. Taking teachers’ perceptions into account during preparation and progression can promote an implementation that is perceived as relevant, effective, enjoyable, and useful for all teachers.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Stockholm: Department of Special Education, Stockholm University, 2025. p. 111
Keywords
implementation, inclusive education, teacher perceptions, school development, universal intervention, special education, compulsory school, implementering, skolutveckling, lärares perspektiv, specialpedagogik, inkludering
National Category
Pedagogy
Research subject
Special Education
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:su:diva-235456 (URN)978-91-8107-044-6 (ISBN)978-91-8107-045-3 (ISBN)
Public defence
2025-01-31, Lecture room 7, house 1, Albano., Albanovägen 32 and online via Zoom, public link is available through the department website, Stockholm, 13:00 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Funder
Swedish Research Council, 2017-03683
Available from: 2025-01-08 Created: 2024-12-03 Last updated: 2024-12-18Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Fohlin, LisaWestling Allodi, MaraSedem, Mina

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Fohlin, LisaWestling Allodi, MaraSedem, Mina
By organisation
Department of Special Education
In the same journal
European Journal of Special Needs Education
Pedagogy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 261 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf