Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Social complexity affects cognitive abilities but not brain structure in a Poeciliid fish
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Department of Zoology. University of Bern, Switzerland.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5592-8963
Stockholm University, Faculty of Humanities, Department of Linguistics, SUBIC - Stockholm University Brain Imaging Centre.
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Department of Zoology.
Show others and affiliations
Number of Authors: 62024 (English)In: Behavioral Ecology, ISSN 1045-2249, E-ISSN 1465-7279, Vol. 35, no 3, article id arae026Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Some cognitive abilities are suggested to be the result of a complex social life, allowing individuals to achieve higher fitness through advanced strategies. However, most evidence is correlative. Here, we provide an experimental investigation of how group size and composition affect brain and cognitive development in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata). For 6 months, we reared sexually mature females in one of 3 social treatments: a small conspecific group of 3 guppies, a large heterospecific group of 3 guppies and 3 splash tetras (Copella arnoldi)—a species that co-occurs with the guppy in the wild, and a large conspecific group of 6 guppies. We then tested the guppies’ performance in self-control (inhibitory control), operant conditioning (associative learning), and cognitive flexibility (reversal learning) tasks. Using X-ray imaging, we measured their brain size and major brain regions. Larger groups of 6 individuals, both conspecific and heterospecific groups, showed better cognitive flexibility than smaller groups but no difference in self-control and operant conditioning tests. Interestingly, while social manipulation had no significant effect on brain morphology, relatively larger telencephalons were associated with better cognitive flexibility. This suggests alternative mechanisms beyond brain region size enabled greater cognitive flexibility in individuals from larger groups. Although there is no clear evidence for the impact on brain morphology, our research shows that living in larger social groups can enhance cognitive flexibility. This indicates that the social environment plays a role in the cognitive development of guppies.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2024. Vol. 35, no 3, article id arae026
Keywords [en]
associative learning, brain morphology, executive functions, group size, group composition, inhibitory control, reversal learning, X-ray
National Category
Zoology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-232243DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arae026ISI: 001222845800008PubMedID: 38638166Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85191014162OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-232243DiVA, id: diva2:1888164
Available from: 2024-08-12 Created: 2024-08-12 Last updated: 2024-08-12Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Triki, ZegniZhou, TunheKolm, Niclas

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Triki, ZegniZhou, TunheKolm, Niclas
By organisation
Department of ZoologySUBIC - Stockholm University Brain Imaging Centre
In the same journal
Behavioral Ecology
Zoology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 9 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf