Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Teachers’ use of augmented input and responsive strategies in schools for students with intellectual disability: A multiple case study of a communication partner intervention
Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Special Education. DART centre for AAC and AT, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2222-4569
DART centre for AAC and AT, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Sweden; Speech and Language Pathology Unit, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, University of Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9582-7814
Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Special Education.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1281-6392
Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Special Education. Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Education. Department of Special Education, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9273-2203
2024 (English)In: Autism and Developmental Language Impairments, ISSN 2396-9415, Vol. 9, p. 1-18Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background and aims: Teachers serve as critical communication partners for students with intellectual disability (ID) who face communication difficulties. However, teachers may lack sufficient training in using communication partner strategies and augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) in the classroom. This study aimed to explore teacher application of a communication partner intervention (AKKtiv ComPal) in schools for students with ID.

Methods: Video observations were conducted at four schools during a teacher-led group activity at pre- and postintervention, with follow-up 7 months later, focusing on communication partner strategies and AAC use applied as a universal approach in the classroom. Differences and similarities in intervention application and contextual factors that may influence teacher application were investigated using a multiple case study approach, in which the four teachers and their contexts served as the four examined cases.

Results: All cases increased the access to communication boards in the classroom and used more augmented input and responsive strategies following intervention. Follow-up measures revealed variability in augmented input and sustained or more use of responsive strategies. Despite increased strategy use, access to communication boards remained inconsistent, and augmented input was used with variability across observation minutes. Influencing factors to teacher application seemed to be classroom setups (such as having a table), previous AAC skills, student characteristics, and postintervention efforts such as repeating the intervention or participating in follow-up sessions.

Conclusions: This study demonstrates that classroom teachers for students with ID can use augmented input and responsive strategies as a universal design approach in the classroom following the AKKtiv ComPal intervention. However, teachers may utilize the strategies somewhat differently, partly influenced by their contextual factors.

Implications: The findings suggest that while teachers for students with ID can successfully use communication partner strategies in the classroom, their use of augmented input should be nurtured over time to ensure sustained use and possibly improve consistency. Additionally, adapting to the physical environment of the classroom is crucial to optimize the application of these strategies.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2024. Vol. 9, p. 1-18
Keywords [en]
Augmentative and alternative communication, teachers, intervention/therapy, interaction
National Category
Educational Sciences
Research subject
Special Education
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-235441DOI: 10.1177/23969415241290419OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-235441DiVA, id: diva2:1912832
Funder
Swedish Research Council, 2017-03683Available from: 2024-11-13 Created: 2024-11-13 Last updated: 2025-02-18
In thesis
1. Supporting Communication in Schools for Students with Intellectual Disability: Augmentative and Alternative Communication and Partner Strategies
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Supporting Communication in Schools for Students with Intellectual Disability: Augmentative and Alternative Communication and Partner Strategies
2024 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Communication is essential for social closeness, educational success, and quality of life. For students with intellectual disability (ID), communication is often challenging due to limitations in intellectual functioning and adaptive behavior. This thesis explores turn-taking and the use of augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) in schools for students with ID. It also examines a communication partner intervention, the AKKtiv ComPal. 

The participants included 33 students with ID and 30 school staff members from seven schools. Data were collected through video observations of structured (circle time) and unstructured (leisure time) group activities at three time points: pre-intervention, post-intervention, and follow-up. Data were also collected to assess students’ communicative skills and limitations. 

A cross-sectional design was used to examine classroom communication, and multiple case studies examined intervention applications and changes over time. Turn-taking and communication modes of students and staff were analyzed using a coding scheme developed for this thesis. Teachers’ use of responsive strategies was analyzed using the Responsive Augmentative and Alternative Communication Style (RAACS) scale. The frequency of their augmented input and the number of communication boards were also measured. Non-parametric statistical tests, descriptive statistics, and visual representations were used to analyze and present the findings. 

Pre-intervention, staff dominated the classroom interactions, and AAC was used less during unstructured activities than in structured and pre-planned activities. Students used AAC more frequently when school staff also did so. Following the intervention, teachers (N = 4) used responsive strategies and augmented input more extensively. Students (N = 10) increased both their number of turns and their use of picture-based communication. 

Consistent use of communication partner strategies by school staff is critical for enhancing student communication. Regular staff training and support may be necessary to address high turnover rates among support staff and to ensure these strategies are applied consistently over time. Improved access to personalized communication systems and better integration of AAC into daily activities are recommended to support students with ID effectively.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Stockholm: Department of Special Education, Stockholm University, 2024. p. 83
Keywords
augmentative and alternative communication, communication partner strategies, augmented input, responsive strategies, intellectual disability, group interaction
National Category
Educational Sciences
Research subject
Special Education
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:su:diva-235687 (URN)978-91-8107-030-9 (ISBN)978-91-8107-031-6 (ISBN)
Public defence
2025-01-20, Lärosal 16, Hus 2, vån 2, Albano, Albanovägen 18, and online via Zoom. Please contact forskaradministration@specped.su.se to receive the link, Stockholm, 13:00 (Swedish)
Opponent
Supervisors
Funder
Swedish Research Council, 2017-03683
Available from: 2024-12-19 Created: 2024-11-18 Last updated: 2025-02-18Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(2917 kB)118 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 2917 kBChecksum SHA-512
922b0a2106d38e46a03193faef67b7f7944103bb93dc39f3683160b9c2d163f20665b855c9da04d18e48fa02c6f8a8b30eb1c3dbff949f2accaa165fc3471f53
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records

Wallin, SofiaThunberg, GunillaHemmingsson, HelenaWilder, Jenny

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Wallin, SofiaThunberg, GunillaHemmingsson, HelenaWilder, Jenny
By organisation
Department of Special EducationDepartment of Education
Educational Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 119 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 358 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf